![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 13,430
|
Shorter-bed full-size pickup to be built at GM plant
May 15, 2004 Fort Wayne -- General Motors Corp. intends to make a shorter-bed full-size pickup truck as an optional model in 2005 at its assembly plant near Fort Wayne, GM spokesman Dan Flores said Friday. The new version of the extended-cab Chevrolet Silverado and GMC Sierra would be about 18 inches shorter than the 227.6-inch length of the present short-box, extended-cab pickup, which will remain in production. GM has requested $30 million in tax breaks from Allen County to pay for body shop and general assembly equipment necessary for the new version, Flores said. Article Here
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Between the puck and the mesh
Posts: 1,902
|
Well atleast they aren't getting rid of the other one. The short box we have now is useless enough, cut 18 inches off it and then what the hell are you going to put in there. It will probably be similar to the Ford Spotrac I assume. Just what we need, useless trucks. Whats the point?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kansas City
Drives: 2002 C5 coupe
2003 Pontiac Vibe
Posts: 194
|
The purpose I believe is to offer choices to consumers who want one, and if the new short-short bed doesn't sell well, GM probably will stop making them. It is very simple folks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 819
|
Well the idea goes that some people buy pickups just to say they're proud to be Americans and just incase they might someday actually use them. This idea created the Lincoln Blackwood (and we all know how well that worked) But it is true that some people would prefer a very short box and a large cab in kind of a mini-SUV. Whether they'll actually sell any, who knows. You gotta give em credit for giving it a shot tho.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 169
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,028
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Drives: 2007 Sierra RCSB
Posts: 786
|
Shortboxes are useless?? I have a 97 reg cab shortbox (which has been a great truck BTW), and I am hauling all kinds of car parts and home construction material. Sure an 8 foot sheet of plywood won't fit with the tailgate up, but it will fit with it down. In the last month I have moved 3 rear diffs for the car I am restoring (parts), fenders, a hood, doors, two rad supports, a trip to the dumps with 600 pounds of scrap, my freinds new TV, and a loveseat.
Nothing useless about a shortbox, and although the new one will be shorter yet, I am sure people will find uses for it. Its funny too, before this truck I had a reg cab longbox, and it was a pain to drive aorund town (parking mostly), this one is excellent, so I can see that people who need an extended cab might appreciate the shorter truck. Just my thoughts. Later Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
2.5L Iron Duke
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 16
|
why all the hate? I just started working that the GM Fort Wayne Assembly plant and we've built a few test models recently. They displayed a green extended cab, with the short bed and 20 in rims last week. Its a sweet looking truck, the overall shape kind of reminds of the Ford Explorer Sportrac.
You can still haul and tow stuff, you just gotta make sure it isnt very long. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
GMI Mod/Camaro Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,543
|
Wow, its like GM is gunna stop making pick ups all together here?
So this is only for the crew cab? You cant get this new short bed on a standard cab truck? 18inches is quite a large amount of weight. Now if they only offerd the 6.0 with this new short bed, and standard cab. I think this is a cool deal.
__________________
![]() Any Inside Info? Questions or Coments? Ideas? Email me at BigAl@GMInsidenews.com 1993 Caprice 9C1 1987 Camaro Z28 1972 Camaro RS |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 650
|
I think it sounds like a good Idea. ext cab trucks are too long for many people, and reg cab short bed can't hold as many people, so it will solve both problems.
I imagine it will look just like the 2000 SS concept ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 525
|
This is kind of like the new crewcabs, they have a shorter box than a normal short box.
Same idea right? Basically it's an extended cab on a regular cab/short box wheelbase.
__________________
-T 87 Buick Lesabre T-type (supercharged) 88 Buick Lesabre T-type (daily driver) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 650
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|