![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#436 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Just right here
Drives: 1980 'Vette
Posts: 4,971
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
Wow, for a supposedly "crappy" truck that no-one wants or cares about, this thread sure has generated a great deal of interest.
Hopefully GM will not add the V-8 because it might get better gas mileage than the 5 banger and spur sales. We wouldn't want that.
__________________
Of all the properties which belong to honorable men, not one is so highly prized as that of character. Henry Clay |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#437 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 13,430
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
Nice, maybe we'll see more orders with gas prices where they are, though I'd opt for the 4-cyl. crew cab for maximum utility and best fuel mileage.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#439 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Drives: 2008 Chevy Colorado LS Z85 2WD, Vortec 2900, 185hp
Posts: 152
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
The only time I would even consider the V8 was if I was going with a CC 4x4. The added weight would hender the performance of the 4 or 5, so the extra power of the v8 would come in handy.
__________________
Grumman A-6F Intruder II ![]() 2 General Electric F404-GE-400D 10,800 lb of thrust each 33,654 lbs payload of weapons and fuel AMRAAM/Sidewinder Defense Now thats the Intruder done right
|
|
|
|
|
|
#442 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 52
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
I know there has to be some one who works at the Colorado / Canyon plant that visits this web sight. To that employee. Please notify us when the V8 production starts. Can't wait to own one
Thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
#446 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arkansas
Drives: 03 GMC Sierra ECSB
07 Chevy Impala LT
Posts: 109
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
Almost GOT to test drive one (2009 Chevy Colorado Ext. Cab 5.3L V8 - Z71/2WD), but didn't have the time.
__________________
2003 GMC Sierra ECSB 2WD/SLT |
|
|
|
|
|
#448 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 52
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
Any one see the V8 with the 3.73 rear end gear ratio yet? I keep hearing of people seeing them but they all have the 4.10. I would think that the 3.73 would do better on the highway millage.I do mostly highway driving. Have not heard of any in south east FL. yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
#449 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Arkansas
Drives: 03 GMC Sierra ECSB
07 Chevy Impala LT
Posts: 109
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
I have. That truck I almost test drive, it has 3.73.
__________________
2003 GMC Sierra ECSB 2WD/SLT Last edited by RB35SLT : 08-12-2008 at 07:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#450 (permalink) |
|
2.5L Iron Duke
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Western Atlanta 'Burbs
Drives: '01 Sonoma ZQ8 and '88 Fiero V8 fastback
Posts: 23
|
Re: No V8 For Colorado/Canyon Until 2009
Went by one of the local dealers on the way home tonight.
Only V8 they had was a white Z71 4wd. Hardly a ZQ8. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|