GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Chevy Trucks/GMC/Hummer News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-21-2006, 07:27 AM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Rex Raider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Drives: 2009 Camry Hybrid (company car)
Posts: 11,787
GMT900 Inside Info

From an un-named but reliable source:

Last night I had a chance to check out two GMT-900 frames for the up-comming light duty GM Ext/Crew Cab pick-ups. One (a 2WD frame) was built up to an engine, drive train, suspension and exhaust and the other was a 4WD or AWD (the front differential had the letters "AWD" markered on it). The frame rails on these 900 proto-types had the inside face closed, the 800's now have an open face on the inside frame rails. With the 900's being closed on the inside I imagine it makes it more beefier, the width of the rails did seem more larger than the 800's. Both frames had a strut type of suspension on the front, leafs on the back. Rear drums were 11.67" and front rotors looked 14" but the fronts were just an observation measurement. The exhaust on the 2WD came out right behind the rear tire. The exhaust on the 4WD (AWD?) came out straight below the back bumper and that exhaust had 3 units (resonator,muffler and a smaller one near the back. The downpipe and Cat wasn't on that system yet. Gone were the torsion bar set-up and replaced with a large rack-and-pinion unit on the 4WD. The upper control arms on the 4WD were large, tubular and made of aluminum. That made them alot beefier and lighter than the ones on the 800's. The tranny on the 2WD unit may have been a 6 speed auto but there was nothing but the words DEX-6 written on it so don't quote me on that, does GM have a 6-speed auto for trucks available now?
__________________
Sure, I drive a Toyota, but at least I don't have to pay for it.

Rex Raider is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 03-21-2006, 07:49 AM   #2 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
tosil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Drives: 2001 Saturn SC2 (yellow)
Posts: 271
Smile Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Good news indeed... this sounds like a very robust setup... and we also know rear drums are back. And just to clear something up, did you mean to say the front torsion bars has been replaces by coil springs, and recircular ball has been replaced by rack- and-pinion steering? If so... this almost sound too good to be true.
And having AWD, that would be similar to the SS setup?
__________________
tosil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 08:03 AM   #3 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 326
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

The DEX-6 means Dexron 6 ATF fluid.

And just for confirmation, did you say that it had rear DRUM brakes?
XCR440SP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 08:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
RamJet502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 3,128
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

I'm a little scared by this. Sounds like GM is sacrificing rear disc brakes and the proven selectable 4WD. I doubt they would only offer fulltime AWD on a fullsize truck.
RamJet502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 08:44 AM   #5 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
 
Ghrankenstein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Springfield, MO
Drives: 2004 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport 5-speed.
Posts: 3,168
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

The drum brakes are an old issue, and they're no big deal. If they were, 18-wheelers wouldn't use them.
__________________
NEW RIDE: 2008 Carp Poseidon (for fish-head delivery)


Ghrankenstein is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 08:45 AM   #6 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Drives: 1996 Cavalier Z24, 2000 Blazer LT
Posts: 1,428
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamJet502
I'm a little scared by this. Sounds like GM is sacrificing rear disc brakes and the proven selectable 4WD. I doubt they would only offer fulltime AWD on a fullsize truck.
Could be an SS model, that wouldn't have the need for 4WD.
jfnz24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 08:49 AM   #7 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,095
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamJet502
I'm a little scared by this. Sounds like GM is sacrificing rear disc brakes and the proven selectable 4WD. I doubt they would only offer fulltime AWD on a fullsize truck.
It could have been testing an AWD system for the GMC Sierra Denali, though that is normally the same as the SUVs AWD system.
__________________

My Musings
91z4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 08:53 AM   #8 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
member12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Atlanta
Drives: pickup truck
Posts: 5,379
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

DEX-6 means Dextron transmission fluid.

I heard the six speed take up the same space as the 4 speeds, so maybe you did see a six speed and didn't recognize it.

How high off the ground was the frame? Was it as low as the 800s? Did you see the engine?

I hope the full time selectable 4wd is still there. A full time automatic system will drive cost up considerably....at least we know it has fully boxed frame rails. I am glad they used drum brakes. The Disc brakes on the 99-02 sucked- they kept screwing up..probably why GM changed back in 2005. They still suck on the 800 Tahoes and Suburbans.

The aluminum control arms are to help in the offset crash. They bend so the front tire doesn't intrude on the passeger compartment. compare the F150 crash test to the Trailblazer (steel control arms). Both compartments held up well, but the F150's wheel tucked in when the Trailblazers wasn't, and it came in a little on the passenger footwell.
__________________
Answer Toyota's FJ and 4Runner...BRING BACK A ZR2 BLAZER!!!!
member12 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 09:03 AM   #9 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Supernoma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO
Posts: 165
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghrankenstein
The drum brakes are an old issue, and they're no big deal. If they were, 18-wheelers wouldn't use them.
It's more of a perceived quality/cost cutting issue- drum bakes are not cutting edge technology, so why would a company use them on a vehicle that will make or brake them?

I should hope these don't make it to the new Caddy EXT/Avalanche
Supernoma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 09:34 AM   #10 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Virginia
Drives: 2008 GMC Acadia 2006 Chevy Colorado
Posts: 539
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

I would rather have rear drums. They wear less and I feel like the stop is more firm.
Steel4ring is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 10:16 AM   #11 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Roseville, CA
Drives: 2003 Chrysler Town & Country 2005 Chevy Malibu
Posts: 837
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Biggest problem with drums is that they don't dissipate heat as fast as discs. That is why Big Rigs have things like Jake Brakes so they don't have to rely on their brakes when going down hills. The positives are they are cheaper to produce for a given amount of stopping power and produce more friction for a given size wheel. They are also harder to moderate the pressure on during a panic stop but with ABS, that is probably not as much of a negative.
__________________
Erik
psece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 10:31 AM   #12 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.
Drives: 88 Fiero, 06 Malibu
Posts: 235
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

The Denali pickup is AWD. That is more than likely what you saw. Our Half tons have had rear drums since 05. The 3/4's get the rear disc. The front suspension sounds like the one on the new Yukons. They have a coil over on the 4X4's. The exhaust system you saw may be for the January '07 diesel which gets the particulate filter.
88Fiero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 10:49 AM   #13 (permalink)
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2009 Acura TSX
Posts: 2,632
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Rear drum brakes? Now they are really going retro.
__________________
Current: 2009 Acura TSX

Gone but not forgotten:
2001 Saturn L300
1993 Saturn SL2
1986 Nissan Sentra
kenman923 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 11:32 AM   #14 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
88montess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 135
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghrankenstein
The drum brakes are an old issue, and they're no big deal. If they were, 18-wheelers wouldn't use them.
Besides if you've driven an 05-06 with drum brakes they feel much better and stop better then then 99-04. also how many have had to work on there e-brake with the drum in hat set up. not fun.
88montess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2006, 11:36 AM   #15 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
Highlander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW Wisconsin
Posts: 407
Re: GMT900 Inside Info

Quote:
Originally Posted by 88Fiero
T...Our Half tons have had rear drums since 05. The 3/4's get the rear disc. ....

Really?! I didn't know they had reverted to drums on the 1/2 tons back in 05. Thanks for the info. I'm hoping at least the HD's stick with discs on all corners. I've never even owned a vehicle with drums as even my old 89 GP is discs all the way around.

The heat generated stopping a loaded truck can be rather extreme... I was hoping for the opposite approach and have vented discs on all corners for the 900's (at least on the HD's)... Although I'll admit that that's probably overkill!
I'm really hoping pedal feel is better regardless of the setup... My only gripe about my 2500HD is the spongy brake pedal feel. Although I'm sure it'll be better once I redo the brakes. It seems very bad compared to my Comp G and even my 89 GP (although those pads and rotors only have a few thousand miles on them)
__________________

my rides: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP Comp G, 1989 Pontiac Grand Prix SE, 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD LT Crew Cab (now pulling a 2008 Jayco Jayflight G2 31BHDS)
Highlander is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Chevy Trucks/GMC/Hummer News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.