![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Drives: 2009 Camry Hybrid (company car)
Posts: 11,787
|
GMT900 Inside Info
From an un-named but reliable source:
Last night I had a chance to check out two GMT-900 frames for the up-comming light duty GM Ext/Crew Cab pick-ups. One (a 2WD frame) was built up to an engine, drive train, suspension and exhaust and the other was a 4WD or AWD (the front differential had the letters "AWD" markered on it). The frame rails on these 900 proto-types had the inside face closed, the 800's now have an open face on the inside frame rails. With the 900's being closed on the inside I imagine it makes it more beefier, the width of the rails did seem more larger than the 800's. Both frames had a strut type of suspension on the front, leafs on the back. Rear drums were 11.67" and front rotors looked 14" but the fronts were just an observation measurement. The exhaust on the 2WD came out right behind the rear tire. The exhaust on the 4WD (AWD?) came out straight below the back bumper and that exhaust had 3 units (resonator,muffler and a smaller one near the back. The downpipe and Cat wasn't on that system yet. Gone were the torsion bar set-up and replaced with a large rack-and-pinion unit on the 4WD. The upper control arms on the 4WD were large, tubular and made of aluminum. That made them alot beefier and lighter than the ones on the 800's. The tranny on the 2WD unit may have been a 6 speed auto but there was nothing but the words DEX-6 written on it so don't quote me on that, does GM have a 6-speed auto for trucks available now?
__________________
Sure, I drive a Toyota, but at least I don't have to pay for it.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Drives: 2001 Saturn SC2 (yellow)
Posts: 271
|
Good news indeed... this sounds like a very robust setup... and we also know rear drums are back. And just to clear something up, did you mean to say the front torsion bars has been replaces by coil springs, and recircular ball has been replaced by rack- and-pinion steering? If so... this almost sound too good to be true.
And having AWD, that would be similar to the SS setup?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 3,128
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
I'm a little scared by this. Sounds like GM is sacrificing rear disc brakes and the proven selectable 4WD. I doubt they would only offer fulltime AWD on a fullsize truck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Springfield, MO
Drives: 2004 Chevy Cavalier LS Sport 5-speed.
Posts: 3,168
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
The drum brakes are an old issue, and they're no big deal. If they were, 18-wheelers wouldn't use them.
__________________
NEW RIDE: 2008 Carp Poseidon (for fish-head delivery)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Drives: 1996 Cavalier Z24, 2000 Blazer LT
Posts: 1,428
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,095
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Atlanta
Drives: pickup truck
Posts: 5,379
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
DEX-6 means Dextron transmission fluid.
I heard the six speed take up the same space as the 4 speeds, so maybe you did see a six speed and didn't recognize it. How high off the ground was the frame? Was it as low as the 800s? Did you see the engine? I hope the full time selectable 4wd is still there. A full time automatic system will drive cost up considerably....at least we know it has fully boxed frame rails. I am glad they used drum brakes. The Disc brakes on the 99-02 sucked- they kept screwing up..probably why GM changed back in 2005. They still suck on the 800 Tahoes and Suburbans. The aluminum control arms are to help in the offset crash. They bend so the front tire doesn't intrude on the passeger compartment. compare the F150 crash test to the Trailblazer (steel control arms). Both compartments held up well, but the F150's wheel tucked in when the Trailblazers wasn't, and it came in a little on the passenger footwell. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2005
Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO
Posts: 165
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
Quote:
I should hope these don't make it to the new Caddy EXT/Avalanche |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Roseville, CA
Drives: 2003 Chrysler Town & Country
2005 Chevy Malibu
Posts: 837
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
Biggest problem with drums is that they don't dissipate heat as fast as discs. That is why Big Rigs have things like Jake Brakes so they don't have to rely on their brakes when going down hills. The positives are they are cheaper to produce for a given amount of stopping power and produce more friction for a given size wheel. They are also harder to moderate the pressure on during a panic stop but with ABS, that is probably not as much of a negative.
__________________
Erik |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI.
Drives: 88 Fiero, 06 Malibu
Posts: 235
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
The Denali pickup is AWD. That is more than likely what you saw. Our Half tons have had rear drums since 05. The 3/4's get the rear disc. The front suspension sounds like the one on the new Yukons. They have a coil over on the 4X4's. The exhaust system you saw may be for the January '07 diesel which gets the particulate filter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2009 Acura TSX
Posts: 2,632
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
Rear drum brakes? Now they are really going retro.
__________________
Current: 2009 Acura TSX Gone but not forgotten: 2001 Saturn L300 1993 Saturn SL2 1986 Nissan Sentra |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 135
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SW Wisconsin
Posts: 407
|
Re: GMT900 Inside Info
Quote:
Really?! I didn't know they had reverted to drums on the 1/2 tons back in 05. Thanks for the info. I'm hoping at least the HD's stick with discs on all corners. I've never even owned a vehicle with drums as even my old 89 GP is discs all the way around. The heat generated stopping a loaded truck can be rather extreme... I was hoping for the opposite approach and have vented discs on all corners for the 900's (at least on the HD's)... Although I'll admit that that's probably overkill! ![]() I'm really hoping pedal feel is better regardless of the setup... My only gripe about my 2500HD is the spongy brake pedal feel. Although I'm sure it'll be better once I redo the brakes. It seems very bad compared to my Comp G and even my 89 GP (although those pads and rotors only have a few thousand miles on them)
__________________
![]() my rides: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP Comp G, 1989 Pontiac Grand Prix SE, 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 2500HD LT Crew Cab (now pulling a 2008 Jayco Jayflight G2 31BHDS) |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|