![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#106 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Oct 2006
Drives: 2007 GMC Canyon CrewCab 4x4 Z71
Posts: 572
|
Re: GM Responds To Jeep Wrangler Success; Hummer H4 Gets Green Light
Quote:
No one is saying that you mom's Jeep won't flex well just that it isn't the SFA that gives the vehicle it's flex. Take your pics if you must but don't forget to ask your mom's permisson first.
__________________
The fastest way to kill a thread is a direct injection of verifiable facts. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#107 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Drives: 1982 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4x4 Diesel W/ 4" Lift kit
Posts: 6,893
|
Re: GM Responds To Jeep Wrangler Success; Hummer H4 Gets Green Light
Quote:
![]() I don't think so DuSpinnst. I have nothing against the H1 at all. Its built for a different purpose than any Jeep. The H2 and H3 is the ones which do compete against Jeeps. A Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon with every option costs as much as an H3.
__________________
![]() 1982 GMC Sierra 2500 4x4, 6.2L Detroit Diesel. Dana 44 Front end, GM 14B Semi Floater Rear, Lifted 4", 33" BFG Mud Terrains It Eats Tundras, Titans and Ridgelines for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner. Formerly Known As: FordRules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Drives: 1982 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4x4 Diesel W/ 4" Lift kit
Posts: 6,893
|
Re: GM Responds To Jeep Wrangler Success; Hummer H4 Gets Green Light
Quote:
Because with IFS, Only 1 side of the suspension will flex over something, with a Solid axle, the suspension can only bend 1 way, helping it flex over stuff. http://detr6oit.50megs.com/ifs1.html Read that and tell me that IFS helps articulation... So many people build up the old GM 73-87 trucks because they already have a SFA in 4x4 apps. You always see more newer (1999+) Dodge and Ford HD trucks compared to the 1999+ GM's because of the IFS. It costs more to lift, and is harder to work on if you break something. For 1/2 ton 2WD trucks IFS would be fine, although with pulling a huge trailer, I would rather have the durability of solid axles. BTW, Heres another good page on IFS vs Solid axles: http://skidplate4x4.tripod.com/FAQ.html#anchor306198
__________________
![]() 1982 GMC Sierra 2500 4x4, 6.2L Detroit Diesel. Dana 44 Front end, GM 14B Semi Floater Rear, Lifted 4", 33" BFG Mud Terrains It Eats Tundras, Titans and Ridgelines for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner. Formerly Known As: FordRules Last edited by Strapping.Young.Lad : 08-01-2007 at 06:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 (permalink) | |
|
Starship Enterpise
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 17,211
|
Re: GM Responds To Jeep Wrangler Success; Hummer H4 Gets Green Light
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeep_CJ
__________________
The moderation here gets an F for FAILURE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canada
Drives: 1982 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4x4 Diesel W/ 4" Lift kit
Posts: 6,893
|
Re: GM Responds To Jeep Wrangler Success; Hummer H4 Gets Green Light
Quote:
__________________
![]() 1982 GMC Sierra 2500 4x4, 6.2L Detroit Diesel. Dana 44 Front end, GM 14B Semi Floater Rear, Lifted 4", 33" BFG Mud Terrains It Eats Tundras, Titans and Ridgelines for Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner. Formerly Known As: FordRules |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|