GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Chevy Trucks/GMC/Hummer News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2008, 03:22 AM   #46 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
redimpss5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,631
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

Wont they cost a bunch more? To ship something that heavy, that many miles a $4.25 a gallon, hmmm, looks like MSRP just went up!
redimpss5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-10-2008, 08:08 AM   #47 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
CaptainDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Drives: '05 GTO
Posts: 1,011
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOOMY View Post
Welcome to the hooray for me screw you mentality of our society today. We are all for a cause or helping someone unless it comes out of our pocket, then we'll put people in the streets to save ourselves a dollar.
Now wait a minute. All of us outside the American Axle facility are NOT looking to screw them. The main people screwing the American Axle/ UAW members is themselves. If they are looking to be paid well more than their jobs merit, (meaning that job can, and is, being done elsewhere for significantly less) my not supporting their strike (a strike which screws a LOT more people than just them) isn't a reflection of a bad society, or un-American, or any other such thing. Even if the strikers "win", they lose. If they price American Axle out of the market, they have no job. No wage.

We applaud GM finding another axle source, so all the OTHER employees who are NOT on strike can stop getting screwed by this, and get back to work. We would certainly prefer to see this work coming from a US plant ,but that's where it WAS coming from until "somebody" stopped it.

I fail to see why people support (demand) non-competitive wages/ benefits, when you've GOT to be able to see your company going out of business under such conditions.

I too would like to have a much larger paycheck. Do you think I should tell my boss that I demand more than others in my field because I want it? Because that will somehow improve the country's economy? And if you don't support my quest than you must be un-American, and looking to screw me.
__________________
'05 GTO
6.0 Liter LS2
400 horsepower
Anything less is just a hamster on a wheel.
CaptainDan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 12:46 AM   #48 (permalink)
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 105
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

What needs to happen at GM is the switching of jobs between the fat cats in the ivory tower and the actual line workers. Let these arrogant head honchos actually work a days pay. Then at least a $3K cash rebate on ALL GM vehicles for GM is losing big bucks in N. American operations remember? And gas is $3.50 remember? And the 125 days supply of trucks/SUV's is twice the norm remember? HELLLLLOOOOOOO
TOMHONE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 01:49 PM   #49 (permalink)
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: General Motors, Oshawa
Posts: 64
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

Update. Oshawa Truck is only running on 1 shift starting Monday the 21st.

As of now we are only working for 2 weeks. Day shift only.
gm world is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 06:42 PM   #50 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
jarsworldcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 256
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

Quote:
Originally Posted by gm world View Post
Update. Oshawa Truck is only running on 1 shift starting Monday the 21st.

As of now we are only working for 2 weeks. Day shift only.
Lucky.
jarsworldcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 03:10 PM   #51 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 156
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

The Janesville plant is shutting DOWN the 2nd shift due to SLOWER sales. 1200 to be LAID OFF. The high and almighty large SUV's/pickup world is DYING. And so is GM. Sorry to break the news to you all but GM is screwed big time. Now they're selling small units in Europe. Hardly an accomplishment making peanuts off these sales. NO MORE $10K profit margins on these gas guzzling tanks.
ARTSBEST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 09:09 AM   #52 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 156
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

GM CLOSING 4 more truck/SUV plants for GOOD. Each employ OVER 2500 men/women. WOW, what a slap in the face to these hard working people. And you think it can't get any worst? Read this folks. And then weep.



Race Is On to Rescue ResCap

Cerberus and GMAC Look to Shore Up
Finances of Struggling Mortgage Lender
By KEVIN KINGSBURY
June 3, 2008 8:47 a.m.

GMAC LLC and Cerberus are scrambling to keep Residential Capital LLC afloat, after the beleaguered mortgage lender discovered it will need to raise $1.4 billion more than expected in just four weeks to meet its own needs and satisfy commitments to lenders.

ResCap, a unit of GMAC, the former financing arm of General Motors Corp., said in a securities filing that it originally thought it would only need to raise $600 million beyond its normal needs by June 30. But an inability to close asset sales and losses on some hedges boosted the figure to $2 billion.
The development is the latest setback for the lender, which has been pounded by the credit crisis and recorded 2007 losses of $4.3 billion. To help close the gap, GMAC and Cerberus agreed to lend more money to ResCap and buy some of the unit's assets. Cerberus, a distressed-debt specialist, bought a controlling interest in GMAC in 2006.

ResCap needs the funds to cover its own operating expenses and to maintain the cash reserves lenders are demanding as a condition of future borrowings. The total could rise further, ResCap said, indicating that it's getting near the end of its rope.

"If liquidity needs are greater, ResCap may be unable to independently satisfy its near-term liquidity requirements," the company said in the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Complicating matters, Tuesday's filing indicates that some of the assets ResCap may sell or pledge as collateral against the new borrowings from GMAC may also have been pledged to back notes that will be issued under a bond swap aimed at restructuring $14 billion in debt that was agreed to just two weeks ago.

The cash-raising efforts are proceeding on many fronts. GMAC boosted the size of a loan to ResCap to $1.2 billion from $750 million, and ResCap plans to draw about $450 million of that amount Tuesday.

GMAC also agreed to buy ResCap's resort-finance business, which currently has a net book value of about $340 million after its debt load is subtracted. And GMAC will buy some mortgage servicing receivables from ResCap under a factoring facility.
ARTSBEST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 07:32 AM   #53 (permalink)
2.5L Iron Duke
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: the desert
Drives: 02 ProCharged WS6, [this spot pending]
Posts: 22
Re: GM reopening two plants thanks to axle shipments from Mexico

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDan View Post
Now wait a minute. All of us outside the American Axle facility are NOT looking to screw them. The main people screwing the American Axle/ UAW members is themselves. If they are looking to be paid well more than their jobs merit, (meaning that job can, and is, being done elsewhere for significantly less) my not supporting their strike (a strike which screws a LOT more people than just them) isn't a reflection of a bad society, or un-American, or any other such thing. Even if the strikers "win", they lose. If they price American Axle out of the market, they have no job. No wage.

We applaud GM finding another axle source, so all the OTHER employees who are NOT on strike can stop getting screwed by this, and get back to work. We would certainly prefer to see this work coming from a US plant ,but that's where it WAS coming from until "somebody" stopped it.

I fail to see why people support (demand) non-competitive wages/ benefits, when you've GOT to be able to see your company going out of business under such conditions.

I too would like to have a much larger paycheck. Do you think I should tell my boss that I demand more than others in my field because I want it? Because that will somehow improve the country's economy? And if you don't support my quest than you must be un-American, and looking to screw me.

Quite well stated. If GM (and the UAW) want to survive they need to STOP looking at things from a employee/employer relationship and look at things in the ONLY way that will keep GM from tanking: a producer/consumer standpoint.

The American consumer has an odd habit. When given the option of buying a tshirt for $18 USD and an identical one with the same quality for $12 USD, what do they do? Why, they shock everyone and buy the $12 one. The same thing applies to vehicles folks. If the UAW saddles GM with costs such that they must charge a hefty premium for a vehicle with little to no perceived benefit for that premium compared with, say a comparable HonToySan, GM is the loser. So is everyone working for them.

To use my example again, it is folly to say that I am unpatriotic when I buy the $12 tshirt instead of the $18 tshirt. Your union-led company may not have as good of sales and your job security may be in jeopardy...but more people benefit from me buying the $12 tshirt. First, I have $6 extra to spend. Second, the worker who made the $12 tshirt benefits. Third, I can now go buy a pair of underwear to go with that shirt. Forth, the worker who made the underwear benefits.

The argument of the playing field not being level is valid in regards to human rights, patents, copyrights, and trademarks...only slightly valid in regards to environmental regulations. Environmental and osha regulations...well...we can debate that one until the cows come home but in the end we all elected the retards who restricted us with insane levels of regulations then set up these trade agreements without said regulations.
Tornado346 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Chevy Trucks/GMC/Hummer News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.