![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2003
Location: *Pontiac~Avenue*
Drives: 1987 Pontiac Fiero
1988 Pontiac Fiero GT
Posts: 1,508
|
DETROIT — Some of the auto industry’s money wagons — high-profit full-size pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles — are starting to fall out of favor as consumers migrate to other types of vehicles, analysts say.
Hardest hit is General Motors Corp., which saw sales of several full-size pickups and SUVs nosedive in June compared with a year ago. While sales of the GMC Sierra pickup inched up, its twin, the Chevrolet Silverado, suffered an 8.1 percent drop in sales last month. Sales of the Chevrolet Tahoe SUV fell 23.5 percent last month while demand dropped 13 percent for the GMC Yukon and 23.9 percent for the Yukon XL. The June decline in GM’s full-size truck sales was shared by its domestic rivals, but to a lesser degree. Sales of Ford Motor Co.’s F-series pickups rose 1.3 percent last month, but demand for the Expedition SUV dipped 0.7 percent and the giant Excursion SUV saw its sales drop 10.7 percent. At DaimlerChrysler AG’s Chrysler Group, Dodge Ram pickup sales slipped 3.7 percent in June. Among foreign manufacturers, Toyota Motor Co. reported sales of its Sequoia full-size SUV fell 16.6 percent. For the year, demand for many large SUVs and pickups is flat or down, while overall light vehicle sales are up 2.3 percent. Lincoln Navigator sales, for instance, are off 8 percent this year. Full Story HERE
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2000 Chev Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 5,170
|
I think the pickup market was so successful over the past few years because a lot of people wanted a RWD V8 powered vehicle. I'm not talking about the people who actually need trucks, but the many who bought trucks for personal every day use, i.e. drive to the office, take the kids to school etc etc. Being that as of now there aren't any stylish, versatile RWD drive vehicles out there, pickups became a popular alternative. Caddy CTS comes to mind but it's more of a luxury car, although sporty at the same time. Ford has the Crown Vic and Grand Marq's but they're grandpa's cars. Chrysler now has the 300 back to RWD and it's a hit, the Magnum is on it's way to the market. I don't believe that this so called RWD craze is a fad, people like RWD vehicles and I think that has a lot to do with why people bought pickups. Yes, there are other reasons too, you sit higher, added safety is arguable, and the come with a V8. As for people saying RWD vehciles are not as good in the winter, I disagree. If you drive cautious and slow enough in icy conditions, there's no reason why you can't handle one in the winter months. For me, driving a steady 60km/h in an 80km/h zone on a straight road a year and a half ago, I almost lost control of the FWD Taurus I was driving. On a straight road. It doesn't matter what you drive, if you hit a lot of ice, there isn't a vehicle out there that going to save you. (By a lot of ice, I mean under all four wheels. It's not good when none of your wheels have traction with pavement.)
__________________
![]() 2000 Chevy Monte Carlo SS. Black, 3800 Series II V6, 4 speed automatic - 138,900km. The Official GMI 2007-2008 NHL Season |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: N.W.Ontario
Posts: 4,793
|
Trucks have been on a slide here since the mid 90's. When I started selling in 1990 75% of our business was trucks now it is less than 50%. Gas prices disposable income and insurance rates are all playing a factor in the numbers I feel. So much of our hobbies here require a truck as well,hunting,fishing, snowmobiling and just going to the cabin.
That is a pretty hard hit for 1 month though but I do know the whole industery is off here in Canada. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 819
|
I can definately see the effects of the gas prices around here. Just looking on the highway, probably 75% of the vehicles are cars compared to what seemed like 50% last year. It was inevitable that the high gas prices would catch up to the truck sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 90
|
I live surrounded by the corn and bean fields of Indiana and if I took a drive and saw more cars than trucks I would be shocked. If you count large SUVs as trucks it would be a blowout.
FWD vehicles are much safer in winter weather than RWD. But RWD is much more fun when the road is clear and dry. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,193
|
Quote:
AWD is the most fun in the snow, but RWD is definately a lot of fun, too. Of course, tomorrow I'm buying a 2000 Buick Regal GS (S/C 3.8 4-speed auto FWD) if all goes well. That's going to be replacing my 1989 Audi 100 Quattro, which simply has too many electrical gremlins for me to deal with anymore. The engine and drivetrain in it are as strong as ever, and truly amazing for a vehicle with more than 184,000 miles on it. I'll miss the ability to drive right through 10-12" of snow, pull super-tight 360's in parking lots, and drift around turns effortlessly in snow and ice. But you know, having leather, good air conditioning that doesn't suck the power from the car, and a much more powerful engine are worth the trade-offs. Not to mention the warranty and Buick's great reliability. I agree that trucks were probably experiencing a lot of growth because of the desire for RWD's more natural handling, and the bigger engines available. But I'll be glad when the majority of those vehicles are being driven by people who really do need those capabilities, and thus there are fewer on the road. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Cobourg, Ontario
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
Is that Thunder Bay , lived there from '79 to '85. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
Take away any one of the conditions you're listing and your statement is FALSE. For example, you need to be "properly trained." Of course, if it's your first time driving in snow on RWD, you don't have the proper training and will have to learn. Hope your car, or better yet you, survives the "training experience." Oh yeah, you need snow tires with a RWD car in winter. Sounds fun to spend $ on an extra set of tires and put them on in the winter. Wonder if they'll fit the next RWD car I buy? :rudolph: Wonder what happens when the snow melts in December but I still have to keep snow tires on due to possibility of more snow later? Gee, the ride really sucks when there's no snow, doesn't it? <_< Yes, those FWD drivers with "crappy" all-seasons sure are fools. No tire changes, scan still drive in snow, not having to spend $ on extra tires, still having a good ride when the snow melts in winter . . . all terrible reasons. :woot2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
2.2 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PA, rural area
Drives: 2006 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 60
|
I live in an area where if a new model comes out, you don't see it around here for a couple of months. This is a Ford Truck town and I didn't see anybody with a new F150 until about 3 weeks after appeared at dealers.( It's a Ford town because there is only a Ford dealer in the middle of town. But it seems the GM Trucks are getting more and more around here)
Anyways when the 300 came out I saw 2 in my town the same week they hit the dealers. So I can only guess that it is a HIT! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,651
|
First off, I really doubt anybody is switching from cars to pickups because of handling ability, regardless of what wheels are driven. There are a lot of other reasons, but I just don't see handling as one of them.
Second, I wouldn't necessarily say FWD is safer than RWD in snow, but having owned both, I would say that FWD just makes it a lot easier to get around. Trying to pull out into traffic when there is snow at the intersection is agonizing in a RWD, unless you carry around a lot of weight in the back. Just taking off from a stop light, you can get moving much easier with FWD than RWD. It's a convenience thing, not so much safety. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Walking
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
and a 4x4 is that much better.
__________________
"If you don't like our wings, We'll give you the Bird" "All your base are belong to us" Current Vehicles: 2002 Chevy K3500 reg cab long box LS 6.6 Duramax/6 speed 4x4 3.73 gears. stock except for k&n filter element, a high idle controller, and a 5th wheel / gooseneck hitch, rhino liner 2002 Chevy C1500 ex cab short box LS 5.3/4L60E 2wd 4.10 gears Trans-go shift kit, LT 255/85R16E in front LT285/75R16E in the rear complete gm 1 ton suspension, HD hood, factory clearance lights, rhino liner, uws toolbox, cobra 29nw-wx-st cb radio w/102" whip, 2500 series guage cluster (adds trans temp gauge), all door handles painted to match, plastic parts of grille painted to match, amber drls, old style tailgate applique -- Sold 2000 Chevy C3500 Crew Cab LWB dually LS 454/4l80E 4.56 gears dual flowmaster 40 series exhaust, mudflaps, sprayed in bedliner, billet grille inserts, clear corner lenses, 3" P.A. body lift, fabtech 4.5" spindle lift 5" blocks. 255/70R22.5 H Bridgestone R294. Custom LED amber "Chicken Lights" 2000 Ford 350 Powerstroke/6spd CC/LWB SRW 4x4, Ford high idle controller with pto provisions, custom amber LED chicken lights. 1996 Chevy Cheyenne C1500 reg cab shortbox Base Plus 4.3/4L60E 3.73 gears Rhino Liner, shift kit, LS am/fm/cd/tape unit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Drives: 2001 S-10
Posts: 366
|
during heavy rain, snow, and ice it sure is nice to pull a lever or push a button. I feel much safer in a 4x4 pickup rather than a front wheel drive sedan. where i'm from almost all pickups are 4 wheel drive so there is no issue with rwd and fwd.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|