Cadillac SRX as good as Q5?

jmlee0695 · 06-17-2009, 03:59 PM

"Cadillac has upped its game in interior fitment, and the SRX stands as their best effort yet, EASILY RIVALING the Q5..."
Look at page 135

'Vette Dude · 06-17-2009, 04:01 PM

lol.

How do you jump to the right page?

Edit: Nevermind. Just type it in.

Quixote88 · 06-17-2009, 04:40 PM

The SRX looks better and better... It's funny they mentioned it may get upstaged by the CTS Wagon... It won't. The SRX should outsell the Wagon 3 to 1...

megeebee · 06-17-2009, 04:50 PM

Can someone copy and post it? All I get is a big, empty grey screen.

.

Canuck · 06-17-2009, 05:47 PM

Great review of the new SRX. Very high praise of the interior.

Taglane · 06-17-2009, 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by megeebee

Can someone copy and post it? All I get is a big, empty grey screen.

.

whew. just got finished screen-capping. I gather no one wants to see the Volvo XC-whatever it was, because it lost lol. Just click on each thumbnail.

GMusa · 06-17-2009, 06:20 PM

Great review! Hopfully its a hit!

FenwickHockey65 · 06-17-2009, 06:22 PM

I think it'll sell decently. Rivals a lot of good-selling luxury crossovers.

mgescuro · 06-17-2009, 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmlee0695

Oh, and a message for mgescuro from his good friend-
Cmicasa the Great

And once again that perpetual loudmouth focuses on performance instead of refinement.
Not surprised as he lacks any refinement whatsoever.
He's deserving of a Cadillac because Cadillacs certainly aren't luxury cars anymore and have lost all sophistication it once had.

SRX is still a big fat FAIL.
And I will continue to stand by that. Performance is NOT the only measure of a car. If Americans and twits like him just understood that, perhaps our automotive industry wouldn't be on the trash heap.

jmlee0695 · 06-17-2009, 06:37 PM

Hmmm. A Car that hasn't gone on sale yet has failed? I'm curious as to how that happened. Please, enlighten me.

GMFAN85 · 06-17-2009, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgescuro

And once again that perpetual loudmouth focuses on performance instead of refinement.
Not surprised as he lacks any refinement whatsoever.
He's deserving of a Cadillac because Cadillacs certainly aren't luxury cars anymore and have lost all sophistication it once had.

SRX is still a big fat FAIL.
And I will continue to stand by that. Performance is NOT the only measure of a car. If Americans and twits like him just understood that, perhaps our automotive industry wouldn't be on the trash heap.

HA! Because the "ultra-refined" Cadillacs of the 80s and 90s were the cream of the crop and were really bringing people into the showrooms. You have zero credibility as an automotive expert and now you're making up excuses for your lack of understanding of where the luxury segment is going.

Oh.. and you say that Performance is not the only measure of a car yet you were upset when GM moved this to a FWD set-up, were you not? Why are you so concerned about a RWD setup if performance is clearly not "the only measure of a car"

You sir, are a FAIL.

Taglane · 06-17-2009, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mgescuro

And once again that perpetual loudmouth focuses on performance instead of refinement.
Not surprised as he lacks any refinement whatsoever.
He's deserving of a Cadillac because Cadillacs certainly aren't luxury cars anymore and have lost all sophistication it once had.

SRX is still a big fat FAIL.
And I will continue to stand by that. Performance is NOT the only measure of a car. If Americans and twits like him just understood that, perhaps our automotive industry wouldn't be on the trash heap.

Did you even read the review? My God I have never seen such a blindly loyal person in my life.

You're either stupid, simple or slow. pick one.

'Vette Dude · 06-17-2009, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmlee0695

Hmmm. A Car that hasn't gone on sale yet has failed? I'm curious as to how that happened. Please, enlighten me.

Exactly. Mgescuro, you have no clue how the rest of the US feels about it. Your opinion hates the car, but the review from professionals didn't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taglane

Did you even read the review? My God I have never seen such a blindly loyal person in my life.

+1.

jmlee0695 · 06-17-2009, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taglane

Did you even read the review? My God I have never seen such a blindly loyal person in my life.

You're either stupid, simple or slow. pick one.

Don't you mean blindly un-loyal?

FenwickHockey65 · 06-17-2009, 06:45 PM

Unfortunately, mgescuro, your opinion of the car isn't what the rest of America thinks...and unfortunately, the rest of America determines whether or not this car fails.

06-17-2009, 03:59 PM	#1 (permalink)
jmlee0695 6.0 Liter L76 V8 Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baton Rouge,la Drives: 08' Silverado 5.3;08' CTS 3.6 DI, 08' Saturn Vue X Posts: 2,422	Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? "Cadillac has upped its game in interior fitment, and the SRX stands as their best effort yet, EASILY RIVALING the Q5..." Look at page 135

06-17-2009, 04:01 PM	#2 (permalink)
'Vette Dude 4.6 Liter Northstar V8 Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Concord, Ohio Posts: 1,852	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? lol. How do you jump to the right page? Edit: Nevermind. Just type it in. __________________ GMI Folding@Home

06-17-2009, 04:40 PM	#3 (permalink)
Quixote88 3.0 Liter SIDI V6 Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 625	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? The SRX looks better and better... It's funny they mentioned it may get upstaged by the CTS Wagon... It won't. The SRX should outsell the Wagon 3 to 1...

06-17-2009, 04:50 PM	#4 (permalink)
megeebee 6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8 Join Date: Feb 2005 Drives: 2005 Cadillac STS 3.6L Posts: 5,218	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? Can someone copy and post it? All I get is a big, empty grey screen. . __________________ *Protect The Sanctity Of Marraige Once And For All.......Criminalize Divorce!*

06-17-2009, 05:47 PM	#5 (permalink)
Canuck 6.0 Liter L76 V8 Join Date: May 2003 Location: Vancouver Drives: 2009 CTS 3.6 DI, AWD, Nav 2005 Envoy Posts: 2,361	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? Great review of the new SRX. Very high praise of the interior.

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
GM Inside News Forum Advertisement

06-17-2009, 06:20 PM	#7 (permalink)
GMusa 6.2 Liter LS3 V8 Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Toledo, Ohio. U.S.A! Posts: 3,073	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? Great review! Hopfully its a hit! __________________ -JD My Ride: 2005 Ford Mustang GT Coupe (Getting ready to trade up!) Project Car: 1969 Javelin SST 290 Family's Cars: -2010 Ford Fusion SE (Sport Blue) -2007 Chevy Cobalt Sedan LT -2007 Pontiac Grand Prix GT -1997 Chevy Camaro V6 30th Anniversary Edition -1998 Ford Taurus SE -1997 Oldsmobile Acheiva Sedan

06-17-2009, 06:22 PM	#8 (permalink)
FenwickHockey65 News Contributor Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: West Chester, OH Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS Posts: 9,122	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? I think it'll sell decently. Rivals a lot of good-selling luxury crossovers. __________________ Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM. Current Cars: 2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4 2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6 1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6 Former Cars: 1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles) 1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles) Future Car: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6

06-17-2009, 06:37 PM	#10 (permalink)
jmlee0695 6.0 Liter L76 V8 Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Baton Rouge,la Drives: 08' Silverado 5.3;08' CTS 3.6 DI, 08' Saturn Vue X Posts: 2,422	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? Hmmm. A Car that hasn't gone on sale yet has failed? I'm curious as to how that happened. Please, enlighten me.

06-17-2009, 06:45 PM	#15 (permalink)
FenwickHockey65 News Contributor Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: West Chester, OH Drives: Chevrolet Malibu LS, GMC Envoy SLE, GMC Sonoma SLS Posts: 9,122	Re: Cadillac SRX as good as Q5? Unfortunately, mgescuro, your opinion of the car isn't what the rest of America thinks...and unfortunately, the rest of America determines whether or not this car fails. __________________ Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM. Current Cars: 2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS: 2.2L ECOTEC I-4 2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6 1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6 Former Cars: 1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006, 243,000 miles) 1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003, 293,000 miles) Future Car: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2LT RS: 3.6L SIDI High-Feature V6

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode