![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,456
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Heart of Europe
Posts: 2,208
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
'The CTS's satellite navigation system is a work of genius but it won't work in Australia'
if that's true, who will buy a luxury car equipped with w navi that doesn't work???
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pacific Paradise, Australia
Drives: VZ Wagon and JSII sedan
Posts: 8,025
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
I'm hoping that comparisons with the 300C are ill founded. I thought the interior of the Chrysler to be one of its weak points so hopefully CTS is good enough to warrant a 60K price tag. Still, once you get over a certain cost, you can get away with being porky, but remain in the cheaper bracket and your prospective purchasers start getting concerned with consumption of natural resources etc. Isn't the CTS as heavy or heavier than the Commondore [sic] ?
__________________
You start a conversation you cant even finish it. You're talkin a lot, but you're not sayin anything. When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed. Say something once, why say it again? |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pacific Paradise, Australia
Drives: VZ Wagon and JSII sedan
Posts: 8,025
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
CTS Base model: 1751kgs
Holden Calais V V6: 1780kgs How does that work out? I thought the CTS would have a better weight advantage than this^^^
__________________
You start a conversation you cant even finish it. You're talkin a lot, but you're not sayin anything. When I have nothing to say, my lips are sealed. Say something once, why say it again? |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | ||
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne (no, not that one!)
Drives: Monaro Barbados 6M
Posts: 1,444
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
Quote:
Insiders are saying later this year the VEII-VF Calais/SV6 Commodores are getting DI (226Kw/308hp) and the six-speed auto, while the Omega/Berlina get the 195/5-speed. Given the CTS is BMW/Merc 5-series sized - smaller than a VE Calais and almost as heavy but with a smaller cabin, boot and fuel tank - it's going to hurt it in the inevitable comparos. Earlier articles were saying $70-80K. It's uncomfortably dearer than the Calais-V, Caprice and Statesman. That's HSV GTS territory - Magnaride, 317Kw/425 hp and sooner or later likely the LS9. Many US-ers on this board are saying selling the G8 without Nav is suicide. Selling the Cadillac with non-functioing nav in that market segment will be it's own punchline. Seriously, this car needs to be prepped better if they're serious. Quote:
__________________
Last edited by BBDOS CV8 : 01-27-2008 at 07:43 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | ||
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 612
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
Quote:
Quote:
In a market sector where genuine luxury contenders distinguish their brand-credentials from pretenders through providing a depth of engineering that is traditionally above the ordinary, this invites the question: Does Mercedes/BMW/Audi etc see fit to downspec their luxury US-bound vehicles with a dedicated set of downgraded brakes especially for that market? If these reputable marques don't stoop to it, why does GM-Cadillac? ![]() (GMNA did similar by de-contenting Monaro brakes & tyres for Pontiac GTO ) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,335
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
I don't understand why Cadillac is setting themselves up for failure in Australia. The CTS market is already more than adequately covered by Holden. I can't imagine how much this is going to cost G.M. in terms of monery and reputation.
__________________
1966 Corvair Corsa |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Drives: '07 Corvette Z51
Posts: 1,472
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
I have, I used to own an IS250. Believe me, it's much smaller!!
__________________
GM better hope the Volt is a runaway success, because all the eggs are in that basket!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Oct 2005
Drives: 2005 Cobalt SS
Posts: 5,917
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
this is quite possibly one of the three worst CTS reviews I've ever read. First its 5series sized in every dimension, not 3 series.
Who cares about the 300C???? Honestly, I highly doubt people will be crosshopping a Chrysler...with a Cadillac. Thats like me crossshopping a Turbo Cobalt with a Camaro SS, IE: not going to happen. It's similar to shopping a G8 with a 5 series...not going to happen! I hate it when people say 'well holden has this price range covered and its a larger size for the same price, ka durk a durk'...well duh, Holden is the chevrolet equivalent in Oz not a Cadillac eqivalent. OF COURSE, people would never QUESTION the PRICE of Audi/BMW/MB entry level vehicles like this because 'deyre german, yah stuttgart mOn'...yet Cadillac CTS gets compared to some calais holden or a 300? Bull S***! A holden V6???? Funny, huh, NEVER HEARD OF ONE! Those boneheads don't know what they're talking about, ALL HFV6 TESTING ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT occurred in NA specifically in the USA! Ka durk a durk! It was all centralized here in MI and in Ontario, sheesh, way to be ignorant. Maybe it was adapted to the local market and underwent certification down under for that market, but its a GMNA design for the world. get a clue lou. Lacking of lateral and front support? Talking about the upteenth airbag lacking for rear passengers? Because someone is a clutz hitting their temp gauges? Spongy brakes?!?!?!? ...what are you smoking? The ONLY legit beef's I can gather are (and I didn't know this till now) the car being LHD not RHD which doesn't seem right to me, isn't it RHD in EU? and Sate. Navigation not working in Oz, yet how is that? Doesn't HSV have navi? Use the same system, duh? CobaltSScrazy
__________________
2005 Cobalt SS I'm done with GMI, some posters type inexcusable and unacceptable replys that are not moderated with enough intensity. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,666
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
Quote:
The CTS is longer than a 528i and the CTS wheelbase is within 0.3" of the 528i. Comparing the CTS to a 4 cylinder C class or 3 series is off mark. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Marion, South Australia
Posts: 601
|
Re: Cadillac CTS: An Aussie Review
Quote:
The Calais interior dimensions are generally greater than the Cadillac The GM Power-train DOHC HFV6 is indeed wholly made in Port Melbourne using Australian programmed Engine Management systems. So all in all, the Cadillac will need to be considerably better than the Calais to be a success. If there is any suggestion that it has any 'in-built use-by-date aspects' for any of its features and equipment, it will be pilloried. Mike Last edited by mmciau : 01-27-2008 at 04:49 PM. Reason: grammar |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|