![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
News Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,413
|
China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
Quote:
__________________
2007 Yukon XL Denali 2006 Chevrolet Corvette |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wellington FL
Drives: '04 GTO
Posts: 157
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
Hate to say it's just as well.
Plus if the Chinese had Hummer, they'll find a way to put toxic seat covers or something similar in the vehicles. Hummer's a turkey. Good luck finding a taker. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 142
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
Quote:
![]() I or on am actually happy about this. I see no need to allow another competitor in this country, and I damn sure don't wanna see an American brand go to the Chinese. But I agree with you, GM should close Hummer as a brand and move it over to GMC as a Trim. It's profitable and still sells to people who want something in the premium of-road category. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fairfax VA
Drives: Chevy S-10 1985
Saab 9-3 2006
Posts: 481
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
take whats profitable sell it under GMC ditch everything else Hummer.
__________________
USA: 1985 2.8L Chevy S-10 New! 2006 2.0T Saab 9-3 Europe: 1987 Trabant 36 cu in Engine -I must not walk to save a child, thats how it works- |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 142
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 613
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
GM should keep Hummer. All they need to do is kill the H2 which does not sell well. Then release the Wrangler clone they were working on. Then you have the Jeep brand which does not have the negative stigma that Hummer has.
I'd like to know who the idiot was that thought Hummers needed to be sold under their own dealer network. They should have been sold at GMC dealerships from day one, like what Toyota does with Scion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
2.5L Iron Duke
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Maine
Drives: 07 Solstice
07 Vue
97 Saturn SC2
Posts: 16
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
I'm refering to the possibility of China nixing the sale, not the taskforce. My point was, if a private enterprise wants to buy Hummer it should be their call, not Chairman Mao
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 117
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
The H2 product cycle is already 7 years old. Yeah they had that "refresh" in 2008, but there's a dire need for a redesign, which GM cancelled a few years back. The redesign could have been a great way to work on clean diesel tech that it now touted by VW / Audi, etc. on TV right now, as well as use innovative materials to keep a stiff frame without all of the weight. As of now Hummer in the US only sells 150+- a month. 85% of all sales are H3 / H3T so the 9MPG argument just doesn't fly as well anymore.
A future inside of GM would rely on possibly a H3 /H3T / H4 lineup in the GMC dealership as mentioned above. A good way to play this if they want to keep the business open (doubtful) is to use the Hummer dealer network and turn it into a GMC dealer. This would work because in recent years these Hummer Dealers were being awarded Caddilac dealerships in conjunction with them, thus providing an upscale car brand and an upscale truck brand. The rugged / purpose built look would go well, although they would have to remove the HUMMER painted on the aluminum roof and possibly alter the side entrance where the big H is. Again that's all pie in the sky thinking if a) China says "no, we already have our own Hummer knockoff brand (which they do), we don't need the real thing", b) all of a sudden GM wants to still own / sell the H3 / H3T. They had other offers on the table, so I'm sure the bondholders would be quite fine with allowing one of those other parties to take the company as well, since the whole point of BadGM is to get as much money back to the bondholders as possible. Just another wrinkle in the GM restructuring, I'm sure they'll be a few more before it's all done.
__________________
Current Vehicles: 2008 Hummer H3 Alpha 2004 Acura TSX 1989 Jeep Cherokee |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 437
|
Re: China likely to reject Hummer acquisition
Man, every time Hummer is mentioned, there is always the "9-10 mpg" CLAIM! This is getting annoying! The Hummer H2 gets that kind of mileage if the driver floors the gas pedal. Based on real-world testing, I've seen mileage claims of 12-14 for the H2 which is pretty darn good considering my mom's old 4Runner got 13 average with only 80 hp! And I DOUBT any Hummers even have a guzzler label by the EPA as well!
Would Raser Technologies still be interested in Hummer?
__________________
My DeviantArt Page: http://seawolfpaul.deviantart.com/ GMC - God's Mighty Creation |
|
|
|