![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 5,065
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
It will still have a range of over 350 miles which is plenty. If I had a Volt I would probably never keep more than a gallon or two in the tank unless I was going on vacation. Maybe more in the winter to keep condensation at bay but that's about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra
'02 Regal GS
"05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,543
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
It makes sense to make the tank smaller and 360 miles is about average for cars today, the EPA does MPG tests with a full tank of gas so some weight saved there could help ratings in addition to the added space mentioned by many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Banned
Posts: 5,185
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
What's not being stated is that the batteries are so good and the series efficiency so good, the range loss isn't quite as significant as calculations might indicate.
400+ mile range?
__________________
A successful man is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at him. David Brinkley |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Posts: 2,110
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
I hope you're right Plane. I get the feeling too, rightly or wrongly, I have no evidence, just a feeling that the batteries are going to be better than GM originally thought. If that's the case, maybe they can advertise an all electric car that uses no gas until it hits 50 miles! That would be awesome!
__________________
Hotness
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 809
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
Exactly, for a large number of Volt owners a tank of gas will probably last over 1 month. An 8 gallon tank would also give the Volt some barging rights at fill up. 50% less expensive to fill the tank for the same mileage as a Cobalt/Focus/Civic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Drives: 2007 Silverado 4x4
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
Not sure about that.
Drive all day for work on battery power, but at the end of the day your car is spent and you only have a 7 gallons of gas (7x35mpg....245 miles), and not enough range to make it all the way to a weekend getaway. I don't know about this, but then again, I have no idea how the car works. It seems like it would be miserable to drive on long trips..having to stop so often for fuel. It does have re-generative braking, therefore works like a Prius when the "plug in" charge is depleted? That means that 40 miles on pure electricity and then 45-50 mpg average after that. Not bad at all.
__________________
Get your geek on in 2012! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
Drives: 2002 GTP
Posts: 992
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
If anything it might be an indication the ICE efficiency is increasing... that would be good news as well. I think it's a good decision even at face value... 350 - 400mi range is enough.
__________________
2007 Avalanche, Black LTZ 4x4 2002 Grand Prix Black GTP, Intercooled |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Baton Rouge
Drives: 2007 Silverado 4x4
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
BTW, this might save them 85 lbs...tops.
It's not for weight savings. It must be for space.
__________________
Get your geek on in 2012! |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
Drives: 2002 GTP
Posts: 992
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
IIRC the mileage with the gen set running all the time is closer to 50mpg.
__________________
2007 Avalanche, Black LTZ 4x4 2002 Grand Prix Black GTP, Intercooled |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra
'02 Regal GS
"05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,543
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
Quote:
I might be wrong about that but that is the explanation I got when I questioned the crazy gas tank size differences on some late 80's GM products that were nearly identical otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto
Drives: 2002 GTP
Posts: 992
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
Quote:
Actually, I think it's encouraging to hear this... it likely means they are serious about reducing the weight.
__________________
2007 Avalanche, Black LTZ 4x4 2002 Grand Prix Black GTP, Intercooled Last edited by tholland : 07-08-2008 at 09:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Drives: '01 Grand Prix GT
'96 Roadmaster Wagon
Posts: 1,789
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
Every pound counts. There was an article on CNN/Money not long ago about all the weight that was saved on different parts of the Ford Focus. A pound here, a few pounds there, it all starts to add up. They were able to offset all the extra structure and safety equipment, etc. and the car didn't end up gaining weight overall. I'm sure the volume savings is important as well. It will still offer excellent range. 600 miles really was overkill. I have heard that when the battery is new it will likely give you more than 50 miles of range. After 150k miles of use it will still be good for 40+ miles.
__________________
![]() 1996 Buick Roadmaster Wagon 2001 Pontiac Grand Prix |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 5,852
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
Sounds fine to me. If the Volt will work as advertised, then the smaller tank won't be a problem for most people.
__________________
2008 5-cylinder turbo hatchback w/ 6sp manual 2006 4-cylinder minivan w/ 5sp manual |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,408
|
Re: GM To Reduce Gas Tank Size for Volt
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|