2007 Chevrolet Tahoe REVEALED!

[MelvinJ]

Originally Posted by goblue

I disagree, James spoke of 385hp and 435hp uplevel 5.3/6L, a 4.8 with more power than whats here - I don't think he got anything right, exept the 400 - which I could have guessed, and the 355hp number. There was no mention of 320, or 6.2s or anything. He was way off.

I guess you're right. I hadn't committed all his numbers to memory because a lot of them just seemed way off. I remembered 355 was there for the 5.3L, which ended up on the 6.0L.

[genjy]

The interior looks pretty good, but there are two things that got to me:

1) The steering wheel could have looked better. It looks sort of on the econo-car design side.

2) The HVAC should have designed to be more integrated with the rest of the center console. The black retangular box look is exactly what the LaCrosse messed up on too.

[kenman923]

Originally Posted by cpacheco

hey my friend, i dont have permission to access to the link page

whats up ?

Neither do I. What's the issue?

[USA1Fan]

I've been looking for information on the "hybrid" powertrains supposedly going to be offered in these 900's, but haven't seen anything yet. Have I just been looking in the wrong places?

[TaHoE]

The Issue has been fixed, thanks for your patience!

[onstar]

Originally Posted by goblue

Engine offerings for the new SUVs include:

4.8L iron block (RPO LY2), rated at 290 horsepower (216 kw)*
5.3L iron block (RPO LY5) with Displacement On Demand technology, rated at 320 horsepower (238 kw)* (including E85-capable version – RPO LMG)
5.3L aluminum block (RPO LC9) with Displacement On Demand technology and E85 capability, rated at 320 horsepower (238 kw)*
6.0L iron block (LY6) heavy-duty engine with variable valve timing, rated at 350 horsepower (260 kw)*
6.0L aluminum block (L76) with Displacement On Demand technology and variable valve timing, rated at 355 horsepower (264 kw)*
6.2L aluminum block (L92) with variable valve timing, capable of 380 and 400 horsepower (283 kw to 298 kw)*

A new Hydra-Matic 6L80 six-speed automatic transmission is matched with the 6.2L engine.

This means same old 4 speeds with the rest. Big dissapointment. GM's bean counters left the interior alone and swarmed over powertrain. I was really hoping for 6 speeds on everything except the 4.8L The media will not overlook GM's obsession with 4 speeds. GM needed to knock this out of the park - the interior looks like a homerun, powertrain is a double at best.

James - you suck.

whats with the iron/alumimum choices?

[TaHoE]

Originally Posted by onstar

whats with the iron/alumimum choices?

Well one would assume that the Cast-Iron choices are for HD versions. Maybe not of the Tahoe, but for the Sierra/Silverado twins.

[mystikranger]

I love the new interior, good job GM!

[Mr. Burns]

looks alot like the last one but more modern. i love it. the dash not so much though, but overall it looks quite elegant and high quality. these are truely competitive vehicles!





looks alot better and im sure GM will sell alot of these

[84jeepjohn]

Originally Posted by Mr. Burns

looks alot like the last one but more modern. i love it. the dash not so much though, but overall it looks quite elegant and high quality. these are truely competitive vehicles!





looks alot better and im sure GM will sell alot of these

now, now and I remember a certian person who was bad mouthing these things

Guys weather James had the right info or not it did get everyone REALLY INTERESTED. The HD may not get the SFA, oh well I'll still get one.
I DO NOT like the exterior that much (I hope it'll grow on me) and that HVAC thig is just silly IMO.

[Mr. Burns]

Originally Posted by 84jeepjohn

now, now and I remember a certian person who was bad mouthing these things

Guys weather James had the right info or not it did get everyone REALLY INTERESTED. The HD may not get the SFA, oh well I'll still get one.
I DO NOT like the exterior that much (I hope it'll grow on me) and that HVAC thig is just silly IMO.

hey, i still dont like SUVs

[84jeepjohn]

Originally Posted by Mr. Burns

hey, i still dont like SUVs

LOL well I guess that's true. BUT you did say you liked the way it looked

[Mr. Burns]

Originally Posted by 84jeepjohn

LOL well I guess that's true. BUT you did say you liked the way it looked

true

[327]

Originally Posted by Mr. Burns

looks alot like the last one but more modern. i love it. the dash not so much though, but overall it looks quite elegant and high quality. these are truely competitive vehicles!







looks alot better and im sure GM will sell alot of these

its the C pillar that make it look somewhat like the old ones, They look awesome though!!!

[80ssportlover]

Why isnt anyone stating the obvious? This thing is going to be thirsty, and with gas prices as high as they are today, whos gonna want that thing? I now have 3 friends who have sold their SUV's for more efficient, and actually faster vehicles. Yea i hate SUV's in the first place but am I wrong here?