Malibu has some angles at which the car looks absolutely fantastic. Just have to photograph the right ones.
|
|
Malibu has some angles at which the car looks absolutely fantastic. Just have to photograph the right ones.
Proud to drive American. Proud to drive GM.
Current Cars:
2013 GMC Terrain SLE: 2.4L ECOTEC I-4
2003 GMC Envoy SLE: 4.2L Vortec 4200 I-6
1998 GMC Sonoma SLS Ext. Cab: 4.3L Vortec 4300 V6
Former Cars:
2007 Chevrolet Malibu LS (2006-2012)
1993 Saturn SW2 (1993-2006)
1989 GMC Safari SLT (1989-2003)
My Ion would get 16 mpg avg. when I had a 7 mile (one way) commute that only lasted about 8 mins. It was 5 stops and 65 mph speed limits. It was fun at times, but horrible for mileage.
When I lived in Colorado Springs it would get me about 26-28 mpg avg. (all city with stop and go traffic after work). That commute was about 15 miles and took about 1/2 hr.
But on long road trips it would routinely top 38 mpg. And I've gotten as high as 42 mpg when driving from Colorado Springs to OKC to visit the in-laws. The return trip would get me about 38 mpg.
These new vehicles are amazing for gas mileage. GM finally figured it out. It's about maximizing BSFC at given speeds. The EPA has it's routines, but most people I know drive 70-90 mph on the highway (depending on which one; like the 101 and 202 is about 70-75, while I-10 is 80-90). So on the EPA cycle the Malibu may turn in 37 mpg (as rated) but in the real world at higher speed it could actually get better!
Like this video from Top Gear. Skip to 1:25.
Good Luck is when hard work meets opportunity.
Fuel economy estimates can be readily attained with judicious driving habits. We experienced mileage numbers of 8.3L/100km (28 mpg) in the city and 5.7L/100 km (41 mpg) on the highway.
How many miles/tank-fulls did you amass to establish your MPG numbers? (what you are claiming would result in mid-30's mixed driving)...
I believe these seats are standard on the ECO and 1LT's (at least in the US).The (optional) premium cloth seat fabric is a certifiable butt grater: it's like riding with an S.O.S pad inserted into your posterior.
Also these are the seats that the consumers report video reviewer said was "scratchy" (and everyone jumped all over him).![]()
Past: 11 Ram 13-11; 10 Commander 13-10; 08 Sierra 11-08; 07 Rendezvous 10-07; 05 Ram 08-05; 04 Grand Cherokee 07-04; 03 F-150 05-03; 01 Silverado 03-01; 00 Jimmy 04-00; 99 Sierra 01-99; 96 Mustang GT 01-98;97 Ram 99-96; 96 Jimmy 00-96; 90 Escort GT 96-92; 89 Ranger 96-91; 84 Omni 92-89; 76 Malibu 90-89; 78 LeMans 94-88; 85 Escort 88-87; 82 Lynx 93-86; 75 Sierra 87-85
Eh, I'm a smidgen over 6 feet tall and I find backseats of mid-size cars pretty good, for the most part... as long as they don't have that coupe-like C-pillar which has become all the rage these days. Compact cars are a tighter fit though...except the Honda Fit, surprised at how much room I have in the back of my friend's Fit.
The only thing I like about these seats is that the side vinyl bolsters are easier to clean than the fake synthetic garbage cloth that most companies are using today so that is a plus for me. The black cloth in my 2008 Impala is far better than the harsh fake cloth IMO and still looks like new, cleans with but a single swipe of a damp cloth and stays clean looking for a long while.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|