GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-10-2008, 02:21 PM   #31 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,041
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by fp115 View Post
Wagoner has nothing to do with the name or the engine selection. IF anything it would be Bob Lutz. But for the most part the name comes from marketing and the companies they hire to provide the census.
The buck stops at the CEO's desk. I have a hard time believeing that Lutz would approve of a car named Cruze.
At Ford, Mullaly makes the decisions on what cars to bring over from Europe and what to call them.
Wagoner is the problem at GM.
steve333 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-10-2008, 03:33 PM   #32 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
fp115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,045
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve333 View Post
The buck stops at the CEO's desk. I have a hard time believeing that Lutz would approve of a car named Cruze.
At Ford, Mullaly makes the decisions on what cars to bring over from Europe and what to call them.
Wagoner is the problem at GM.
Lutz doesn't decide on car names, LaNeve does. Lutz can have a say in it but in the end its LaNeve and the census results. Census results hold higher weight than anything else. If you want to complain about the name, complain to the people who do not work for the company who were given a list of names to pick out.

The Cobalt name is by far too tarnished for people to want to buy the car. Changing the name to Cruze will also increase resale value and allow GM to give it a premium equal to the Civic.
fp115 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 03:34 PM   #33 (permalink)
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
 
96_impala_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Drives: 96 Chevy Cavalier 96 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Posts: 1,677
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by neshapop View Post
Was the info on GMI somewhere that new Buick Regal supposed to be built in Oshawa as Insignia knockoff for Canada and China? That would I guess kill Aura/Insignia for Saturn?

Will LaCrosse be available in Canada then or just Regal? How ironic with the names for Canadian vs. US markets...

Or I got it all wrong above?

And will GM live long enough to see those production launches?
LaCrosse is Allure because its supposedly French/Quebecois slang for jacking off. The word Crosse is slang for being screwed over. Technically the slang word for masturbation in normal French is SeCrosse. I guess things arent always expected. The Regal is the Insignia though. Nothing more than a rebadge. Its not a knock off. Im not sure if GMNA will want to bring back the Regal name though. It might end up with a name like Branler or SeCrosser. (more slang for masturbation )
__________________


Follow me on Twitter
Check out my other artwork here!

The price of having hope is sometimes disappointment, but the price of having no hope is always failure… - Immortal Technique
96_impala_ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 03:57 PM   #34 (permalink)
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
 
exmechanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Drives: '10 White Equinox LTZ
Posts: 47
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsap View Post
The Coupe has been pushed back a year as of last week.
We got our revised production schedule today for 2009's and 2010's and the CTS coupe is still on there.
exmechanic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 04:41 PM   #35 (permalink)
GMI Design Contest Official
 
A.J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Drives: 2007 Buick Lucerne CXL, 2005 Ford Freestyle SEL
Posts: 1,210
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Having read the story again, I can understand the reasoning for delaying the new Saturn Aura.

First, GM sells the Insignia as an Opel/Buick over in Europe and China.
Second, GM works out any potential problems that the Insignia might have.
Third, GM sells the Insignia as a Saturn over here in the States.

It's common sense, really. Why would you want to get a product over here early when it might be plagued with problems?
__________________


A note to all design contest participants - if I pound you with penalties or point out that you can't enter one of your designs, please do not think that this is a personal bash on you as a designer. I am merely enforcing the rules that I have set down.
A.J. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 04:41 PM   #36 (permalink)
Editor-in-Chief
Premium Member
 
nsap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT
Posts: 17,730
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaz_23 View Post
What about the Volt?

I bet GM is going to screw Epsilon II up, the way they did Zeta. For decades only Buick will get it, which means it'll get some good reviews here and there and very few sales. It should have been an Aura first and then a Buick. Higher prices for the Buick are not going to make up for the dismal sales that it'll have.

And what are the plans for NA Zeta? Camaro, that's it? All that retooling for one niche car?
I can tell you that the LaCrosse will have the content/features to compete very well. I'm crossing my fingers that we have another Enclave on our hands....

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve333 View Post
The buck stops at the CEO's desk. I have a hard time believeing that Lutz would approve of a car named Cruze.
At Ford, Mullaly makes the decisions on what cars to bring over from Europe and what to call them.
Wagoner is the problem at GM.
The "Cruze" name was fully picked by marketing. Few others were involved in the decision. Same goes for SRX and LaCrosse for the new ones.

Quote:
Originally Posted by exmechanic View Post
We got our revised production schedule today for 2009's and 2010's and the CTS coupe is still on there.
All of GM's press releases clearly state its pushed back a year. These changes are so new its possible they haven't made it through the channels yet. I'm told things are nuts right now (not a surprise).
__________________

Get the latest news from GMI...Join the "GMInsidenews.com Facebook Page!!
Follow me on TWITTER
E-Mail Me
nsap is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 05:36 PM   #37 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
The Law's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ulster County NY
Drives: VW Golf 1.8T Saab 900 SE 2.0T(5spd) Honda Civic
Posts: 455
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

What about:

Saab 9.3 and Saturn Corsa?
__________________
Iraq War Vet 2003-2004

Wanted: (GM Euro )([Buick[/size]) 3dr/5dr. hatchback,Bio-Diesel or gas: 1.8-2.0 turbo, computer assisted -AWD, Blue tooth interface,sport micro fiber seatstrimmed in leather, projector lights, Led tails.

Waiting for 2010 Buick Astra/Corsa

The Law is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 05:43 PM   #38 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS3 V8
 
stevecmh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Muskego, WI
Drives: 04' Grand Prix GT 08' Pierce Impel Ladder Truck
Posts: 3,867
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by WishIhadatruck View Post
If the Aura isn't an almost exact clone of the Insignia I really don't understand. It is such a waste of resources if the Insignia doesn't come to the US at one of the brands.

Glad to see an MPV/Orlando vehicle is still coming to the US. I think this would be my ideal family vehicle. If it can seat 5 easily and 7 in a pinch and still get as good or better mileage than current mid-size cars it will be perfect for me. I assume it will use the same 1.4L turbo that the Cruze will use?
agreed.. very happy to see the MPV coming.

also very happy to see the Camaro on time.

Most are very close which is good.. to bad bout the CTS coupe
stevecmh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 05:47 PM   #39 (permalink)
Editor-in-Chief
Premium Member
 
nsap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT
Posts: 17,730
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Law View Post
What about:

Saab 9.3 and Saturn Corsa?
Neither are even close to launching, so I didn't bother to include them.

Oh, I should add that the Delta II Astra has been pushed back as well. Not that it's a surprise...
__________________

Get the latest news from GMI...Join the "GMInsidenews.com Facebook Page!!
Follow me on TWITTER
E-Mail Me
nsap is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 07:47 PM   #40 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
gmhashope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 4,199
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by steve333 View Post
All the Astra needed was the 2.2L Ecotec Powertrain and the Sedan version. How freaking hard is that for GM to understand?

As for the Cobalt/Cruze 2010 is ridiculous. GM could just put in the 2.2L Ecotec for now and offer the 1.4 Turbo when it is ready. Keep the name Cobalt and it would sell very well, IMO. There is NO reason to wait and NO reason to change the name to Cruze. Wagoner is an amazing imbecile.

The Insignia should be built here as the new Buick Regal. LaCrosse is a dumb name and doesnt sell.

Saturn needs to be axed yesterday. Small dealer network, low sales. How much money is GM dumping into this brand and for what reason? Just use Opel designs for Buicks and Pontiacs.

Rick Wagoner has got to go, NOW.
Right I forgot you had 30 years of experience running multi-billion dollar companies.

GM makes NO MONEY on small cars. Gas is $1.99 by me so yea great idea lets rush forward something GM will make no money on when they have serious money issues.

The Astras price is too high and it is not advertised enough, actually barely at all. Ideally, I'd love to have a lot of things.

The problem with GM is they keep changing their plan. They waste some money doing something then a month change their mind and waste more money. Couple this with the rising costs of material and labor, legacy costs, and a declining economy and things will be bad no matter who's in charge.
gmhashope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 08:13 PM   #41 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Drives: 2008 Cadillac SRX 1992 GMC Safari 1941 Packard 1
Posts: 121
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

What about the Saturn 2 mode hybrid, when will that get here?
Hoboken Tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 08:17 PM   #42 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
fp115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,045
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoboken Tim View Post
What about the Saturn 2 mode hybrid, when will that get here?
The Vue PHEV? That is set for 2009.
fp115 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 08:52 PM   #43 (permalink)
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
 
hotrod1949's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 625
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

Quote:
Originally Posted by Canyonaro View Post
This helps a little bit since it seems like daily all this changes. Thanks for the info, it is much appriciated.

I myself am waiting for the GMC Terrain, my wife wants an Acadia but we don't need anything that big and I am a little cheap so thie will fit us quite well.
I think the chart is a little off, from what I understand, the Terrain SOP is August/09.
hotrod1949 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 09:13 PM   #44 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2009 Acura TSX
Posts: 2,880
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

I think that the Government should only give GM a loan if they promise to do some serious restructuring. If GM is not willing to do that, they deserve to go under.
kenman923 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2008, 09:23 PM   #45 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
1931Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,870
Re: Product Mix-ups Explained; 2009 Launch Time Line

will there be a GM for this cars
__________________
Quote:
“We are masters of our own destiny,” he said. “We make our own decisions. And we intend to keep it that way.” Bill Ford May/09
Quote:
By Mark Fields
"Perform or the bank will own us"
Buying GM cars since 1931
Hungry ,eat your import
1931Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.