![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Daytona Beach, FL and Upstate NY
Drives: 2008 Saturn Vue Redline
Posts: 2,629
|
LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
http://www.freep.com/money/business/...e_20050611.htm
Should not be a surprise, but a lot of people don't realize this: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate Autos No doubt about it. Hybrid cars and trucks are hot. Going farther on a gallon of gas not only seems like a smart financial move in an era of $2-a-gallon gas, but you feel like you're doing your part to save the environment, too. But will that popularity endure as the financial reality of hybrids becomes more clear: Lower fuel bills don't offset the extra cost of a gas-electric powertrain. A new study by Edmunds.com, a California-based research company, shows that hybrids typically cost thousands more to buy, fix and run over a five-year period than comparable, conventionally powered vehicles. The Ford Escape Hybrid, for example, costs $3,429 more to buy and run than an all-wheel-drive Ford Escape XLT. Gas would have to cost $5.60 a gallon, or you'd have to drive that hybrid 37,000 miles a year, to break even with the conventionally powered Escape. The Toyota Prius costs $5,283 more than a Toyota Corolla LE. Gas would have to cost $10.10 a gallon or you'd have to drive the Prius more than 66,500 miles a year to break even with the Corolla. Looking for a break-even proposition? Edmunds.com puts the total cost of a Prius at about that of a Toyota Camry LE. But are those truly comparable cars? Not in LI's opinion. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 994
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Praise GOD, the truth is told! Now let's see how long it takes for this to make the mainstream press.
__________________
Blah blah blah....green green green....global warning....blah blah....carbon footprint....green green....blah blah....catch phrase...talking head...blah blah blah |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Central Florida
Drives: 2004 Chevy Trailblazer
2002 Acura TL 3.2
2006 N
Posts: 1,033
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Oh No!
News that is not bashing GM!!! I bet you won't here any of this on CNN or Newsweek or better yet Business Week.
__________________
Don't forget CRACK IS WHACK!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: America
Posts: 2,256
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
__________________
Member of the "dark side". Oh well, black is my favorite color. Sorry, I prefer McDonalds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,497
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Hybrids are emotionally hot, but there's never been a personal finance case for one. GM does this a lot though - they overcrunch the numbers. Vehicle purchases don't have to make sense to just engineers and accountants, they have to make sense to a wide swath of society, and there are plenty that will pay more than they need to for a not so logical reason. American purchasing habits seem to be based on that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MO & FL
Posts: 1,932
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
Looking at trends, many of them sweep from California eastward. The SUV trend started there in the early 1990's, and the hybrid trend started there in 2002/2003. Regardless of the merits of the techonology, it will continue to gain market share, mainly at the expense of large SUVs. Never underestimate the willpower of the American consumer to buy the newest "gotta have" gadget. (I.E. flat panel TV, apple Ipod, Toyota Prius) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 24,405
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
But that's not the point, is it???
It was considerably obvious to many people that a Hybrid was going to cost more to maintain. Unlike most Americans, I ran projected numbers. (I sort of had to for my Product Marketing class.) And my numbers were relatively similar to those indicated in teh article. However... that isn't the point. THe Hybrid touches on people's "Emotional" button. People irrationally go buy something without really knowing what's behind it because they think it's better for them. THe trick is... to maintain that momentum. THat's why Toyota sells so many of those ugly things. Why in the world does the iPod have 82% of the world's marketshare for MP3 players?? It's not the cheapest one. It doesn't have the longest battery life. It is not the most feature packed. It's the emotional button. It is the easiest to use. it is also the lightest. But those alone aren't enough to sell the iPod.
__________________
![]() 2000 Saab 9-5 Aero 1995 Mercedes C280 1994 Jaguar XJ6 ...when all hope is gone, you know sad songs say so much...My Vision of Cadillac My Vision of Cadillac (REDUX) ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Just right here
Drives: 1980 'Vette
Posts: 4,972
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Just maybe, GM is smarter than we give the General credit for. What about the GM hybrid buses? I'll wager that the numbers crunch on those puppies. Perhaps GM is holding back with BAS and two motor technology for the right moment? To stage the greatest automotive comeback in history?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: America
Posts: 2,256
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
__________________
Member of the "dark side". Oh well, black is my favorite color. Sorry, I prefer McDonalds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 4,079
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 4,079
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,497
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
Just think how many vehicles could be full hybrids if they did the 4T40s and 4T60s, let alone the truck transmissions... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MO & FL
Posts: 1,932
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 4,079
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ
Drives: 2006 Chevrolet Trailblazer SS LT AWD
Posts: 850
|
Re: LEADING INDICATORS: Hybrids cost more to buy, operate
Quote:
__________________
One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man. —Elbert Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|