GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2008, 06:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
 
jameskz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scumter, SC
Drives: 1995 Ford Escort LX, 1999 GMC Safari SLT
Posts: 48
LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cuts

Quote:
The carmaker will offer 0% financing for loans as long as six years on most of its 2008 models.

Citibank will help GM assess possible offers to purchase HUMMER...will also help GM assess other options...including a possible revamp of the brand's model line-up

For the 2009 model year, GM said almost all car and truck models will have higher sticker prices.

LaNeve would not comment on the future of the Hummer brand...No other brand cuts are being considered, he said.
Article continued at link:

http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/auto...sale/index.htm
__________________
CHECK THIS OUT!!!
Person to person lending on Prosper.com
http://www.prosper.com/join/sumguyonhear

Current:
-95 Ford Escort LX
-99 GMC Safari Van SLT

Yes, I sold my H2 and GTO for an Escort and a minivan. Why? Because I'm waiting for the Camaro SS or the G8 GXP...or both
jameskz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 06-24-2008, 06:38 AM   #2 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
Buickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flint MI
Drives: 08 Enclave
Posts: 1,902
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Quote:
Originally Posted by jameskz28 View Post

LaNeve and Co claim this sale is to build momentum while in fact it will serve to destroy momentum. when it's all said and done, July will tank and our image will be further damaged by the distress merchandising. furthermore, we will not make any money giving vehicles away and blowing untold millions on a disastrous marketing campaign.

next, why do we always need banks to assist us in the never ending asset sales? don't we know what our stuff is worth and don't we have enough lawyers and accountants on board to handle such transactions? is it any surprise we pay so much in investment banking fees when the Board is stocked iwth banking representatives?

it's one mistake after another under Red Ink Rick, Fiat...accounting scandals, Olds run into the ground and gone, GMAC making bad loans then spun, Buick starved of product, Delphi spun while we're still under obligation, on and on and on.

WHY IS WAGONER STILL HERE?????????? the stock is sure telling us he has to go.
__________________
Buickman
Founder
www.GeneralWatch.com

It's not sunk, but's its definitely sinking.

We don't need a Volt, we need a Revolt!

Aristotle "A is A"

Wagoner "BK is OK"
Buickman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 07:58 AM   #3 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
dindak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto area
Posts: 2,185
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Cutting brands is an error. Good man!
dindak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 08:27 AM   #4 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
paul38469's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Drives: 1998 GMC Yukon SLT
Posts: 171
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

I am relieved that he said no other brands will be cut. Then again they often say one thing and do another.

I guess they are trying to bump up June's disasterous numbers a little. Results will still be brutal, I think. Fuel hysteria will still be with us for a few more months before people settle down and stop trading in their vehicles for tiny econoboxes. The GMT-900s are never going to sell in the volumes that they did, though, so it is good to hear that they are trying to keep inventories under control.
paul38469 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 09:37 AM   #5 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston,Texas
Drives: Oldsmobile Toronado and Oldsmobile Ninety Eight
Posts: 414
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

I will the be first to admit I recently said cut a brand in another thread. I was wrong. I do still feel something that will not be popular though.

Years ago, I remember either GM wrote me or some outlet printed something to this effect:

The introduction of the suv's and trucks in the market has shifted the market away from luxury cars, personal luxury coupes in favor of truck and suv production. This was around the time the plant here in Texas shifted from fullsized cars to trucks and suv's.

Now they should shift back to more efficient cars and more luxury cars. Luxury cars and medium priced cars can make a profit where small cars cannot. The medium prices cars and luxury cars profit margin would offset the small cars. It would not be a full line brand of course. That was one of the reasons I called for Oldsmobiles return.


Oldsmobile would consist of three to four solid vehicles:

98- fullsized traditional luxury car( people are living longer and getting older)
Toronado- personal luxury coupe- ( GM does not have one)
Custom Cruiser- a true station wagon/ crossover
Cutlass Supreme- GM has no midsized coupes front wheel drive or rear drive.


Before you start bashing me:

Saturn is staying and it is full line Opel North America. I still say drop Outlook.....
You cannot keep adding cars to Chevrolet.
If Saturn was the green division, they would have given to VOLT to them. They did not.
Cadillac is not for everyone in price and structure. It is the higher standard.
Pontiac cannot be everything to everyone sitting in the same showroom as Buick.
Buick is becoming more like Buick China. That is a different type of luxury.

No, the Oldsmobiles would not be in a stand alone showroom either. Sell that at Saturn showrooms to draw people in or Chevrolet showrooms like they did for years anyway..
NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 12:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
FierySolstice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Drives: 2007 Saturn Aura
Posts: 737
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Quote:
Originally Posted by NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY View Post
I will the be first to admit I recently said cut a brand in another thread. I was wrong. I do still feel something that will not be popular though.

Years ago, I remember either GM wrote me or some outlet printed something to this effect:

The introduction of the suv's and trucks in the market has shifted the market away from luxury cars, personal luxury coupes in favor of truck and suv production. This was around the time the plant here in Texas shifted from fullsized cars to trucks and suv's.

Now they should shift back to more efficient cars and more luxury cars. Luxury cars and medium priced cars can make a profit where small cars cannot. The medium prices cars and luxury cars profit margin would offset the small cars. It would not be a full line brand of course. That was one of the reasons I called for Oldsmobiles return.


Oldsmobile would consist of three to four solid vehicles:

98- fullsized traditional luxury car( people are living longer and getting older)
Toronado- personal luxury coupe- ( GM does not have one)
Custom Cruiser- a true station wagon/ crossover
Cutlass Supreme- GM has no midsized coupes front wheel drive or rear drive.


Before you start bashing me:

Saturn is staying and it is full line Opel North America. I still say drop Outlook.....
You cannot keep adding cars to Chevrolet.
If Saturn was the green division, they would have given to VOLT to them. They did not.
Cadillac is not for everyone in price and structure. It is the higher standard.
Pontiac cannot be everything to everyone sitting in the same showroom as Buick.
Buick is becoming more like Buick China. That is a different type of luxury.

No, the Oldsmobiles would not be in a stand alone showroom either. Sell that at Saturn showrooms to draw people in or Chevrolet showrooms like they did for years anyway..
Where would Oldsmobile be positioned? How does Saab factor into this? You say that GM has no midsized coupes, what about the G6 coupe/convertible? The upcoming Camaro? As long as GM has Saab, Saturn and Buick, there is no chance to bring Oldsmobile back.
__________________
Past Rides:
1991 Saturn SC 2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse
2005 Pontiac G6 2000 Pontiac Grand Am
2007 Saturn Aura
Future Rides:
Saturn Sky/Chevy Camaro/Pontiac G8/Cadillac CTS Coupe
FierySolstice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 12:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,666
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Quote:
Originally Posted by NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY View Post
Oldsmobile would consist of three to four solid vehicles:

98- fullsized traditional luxury car( people are living longer and getting older)
Toronado- personal luxury coupe- ( GM does not have one)
Custom Cruiser- a true station wagon/ crossover
Cutlass Supreme- GM has no midsized coupes front wheel drive or rear drive.

Fullsized traditional luxury car


Personal luxury coupe


Station wagon crossover


Mid-sized coupe



Now you know why Oldsmobile is gone: Pontiac to the left of me, Buick to the right, stuck in the middle with you.
HoosierRon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:03 PM   #8 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,791
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

"Citibank will also help GM assess other options for Hummer, including a possible revamp of the brand's model line-up."

If GM needs bankers to assess brand model line-ups, they're more desperate and incompetent than I thought.
Chaz_23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Ambalanche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Drives: '07 Corvette Z51
Posts: 1,472
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

LaNeve is a PR hack! I don't take anything he says as gospel.
__________________
GM better hope the Volt is a runaway success, because all the eggs are in that basket!
Ambalanche is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
AMERICA 123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Drives: The bailout pkg
Posts: 2,397
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Good - no Great!!!

Exactly how they should play it.

I thank God that everyone from the professional Toyota Spin Doctors to the misguided GM supporters have nothing to do with the decision making process and plan making at GM's HQs.


Most of you don't realize how bad the Toyota people are leading you around by the nose.
__________________
" 123"
" 1-2-3, oh, that's how elementary it's gonna be -"

"There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning." --Warren Buffet, June 2008

Last edited by AMERICA 123 : 06-24-2008 at 07:49 PM.
AMERICA 123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
RamJet502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 3,128
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Isn't Citibank about to go out of business, why are they reviewing Hummer?
__________________
RamJet502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:30 PM   #12 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Drives: '98 H1 Open-top HMVEE! '67 Rolls Silver Shadow '
Posts: 1,040
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

I hope they pay laneve 2 cents/year, he really grates on me- BTW- no 0%, 72 month on the enclave or I would have gone and got one this weekend.
ghughes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 533
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghughes View Post
I hope they pay laneve 2 cents/year, he really grates on me- BTW- no 0%, 72 month on the enclave or I would have gone and got one this weekend.
That would be a sweet deal but you must agree that GM has to make a profit on SOMETHING that will actually sell.
goatgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:50 PM   #14 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
 
nadepalma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,646
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Dont know how much faith I put in this.

If the market is going the way it is - and they are NOT considering what to do with some of their other brands - then they are not good corporate officers.

I'm not saying "Cut this or that" but every option should be on the table if they are seeking to right the ship.

I didn't like the idea of cutting Olds - I hated it in fact - but looking back I recognize that it was arguably the right thing to do. I dont like the idea of killing any other brands - but moving forward, if it means killing Hummer, GMC, or any other brand to keep the ship afloat, then they should examine it closely.

Just my two cents - and don't know if I take LaNeve at his word.
__________________
Email: nadepalma@gminsidenews.com

"La vita è come un albero di Natale..c'è sempre qualcuno che ti rompe le palle!"

"You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves"
-Abraham Lincoln

"Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried"
-Winston Churchill

"In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a Congress"
-John Adams
nadepalma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2008, 01:53 PM   #15 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston,Texas
Drives: Oldsmobile Toronado and Oldsmobile Ninety Eight
Posts: 414
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu

Never mind. There are too many holes in the arguments against what I said. I knew that was coming.

I will leave it at this:

G6 coupe is not even midsized.That car is really not that much larger than Grand Am was ,and Grand Am was classified as compact. If Pontiac got the Alpha platform, that G6 coupe would be smaller. So, technically now and future, GM does not have a midsized coupe. Buick is not producing or selling a coupe now or in the future. Malibu is larger and wider than a G6.

A midsized coupe is about the size of the Grand Prix, the departed Monte Carlo. No, GM does not have anything that size. That Riviera concept is smaller than that.

I said crossover station/wagon not a TAHOE sized crossover which is what Enclave is.


I know when GM got rid of Oldsmobile they push me and other Oldsmobile owners out. They left GM or they went to a competitor or keeping their cars like I have. They did not stay with GM. I will tell you from personal experience, GM does not offer Oldsmobile owners anything anymore.

If I wanted a Buick, I would have bought a Park Avenue when I bought my Ninety Eight. What makes you think I would be interested in the Lucerne? That car does not even have many of the features my car has. It is not even the same type of car.

If I wanted a Buick, I would have bought a Riviera when I bought my Toronado. Why would I go buy something smaller like a Pontiac G6 that has no where near the room or space or features I have on my car?


What you are doing is what GM is doing. You are trying to sell me something I do not want or interested in. Please do not tell me how a Lucerne or a G6 is like buying an Oldsmobile. It is not.

That is why GM is in the situation it is now because of thinking and decisions like that.
NINETY_EIGHT_REGENCY is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.