![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Scumter, SC
Drives: 1995 Ford Escort LX,
1999 GMC Safari SLT
Posts: 48
|
LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cuts
Quote:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/auto...sale/index.htm
__________________
CHECK THIS OUT!!! Person to person lending on Prosper.com http://www.prosper.com/join/sumguyonhear Current: -95 Ford Escort LX -99 GMC Safari Van SLT Yes, I sold my H2 and GTO for an Escort and a minivan. Why? Because I'm waiting for the Camaro SS or the G8 GXP...or both |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flint MI
Drives: 08 Enclave
Posts: 1,902
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
Quote:
LaNeve and Co claim this sale is to build momentum while in fact it will serve to destroy momentum. when it's all said and done, July will tank and our image will be further damaged by the distress merchandising. furthermore, we will not make any money giving vehicles away and blowing untold millions on a disastrous marketing campaign. next, why do we always need banks to assist us in the never ending asset sales? don't we know what our stuff is worth and don't we have enough lawyers and accountants on board to handle such transactions? is it any surprise we pay so much in investment banking fees when the Board is stocked iwth banking representatives? it's one mistake after another under Red Ink Rick, Fiat...accounting scandals, Olds run into the ground and gone, GMAC making bad loans then spun, Buick starved of product, Delphi spun while we're still under obligation, on and on and on. WHY IS WAGONER STILL HERE?????????? the stock is sure telling us he has to go.
__________________
Buickman Founder www.GeneralWatch.com It's not sunk, but's its definitely sinking. We don't need a Volt, we need a Revolt! Aristotle "A is A" Wagoner "BK is OK" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Drives: 1998 GMC Yukon SLT
Posts: 171
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
I am relieved that he said no other brands will be cut. Then again they often say one thing and do another.
I guess they are trying to bump up June's disasterous numbers a little. Results will still be brutal, I think. Fuel hysteria will still be with us for a few more months before people settle down and stop trading in their vehicles for tiny econoboxes. The GMT-900s are never going to sell in the volumes that they did, though, so it is good to hear that they are trying to keep inventories under control. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston,Texas
Drives: Oldsmobile Toronado and
Oldsmobile Ninety Eight
Posts: 414
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
I will the be first to admit I recently said cut a brand in another thread. I was wrong. I do still feel something that will not be popular though.
Years ago, I remember either GM wrote me or some outlet printed something to this effect: The introduction of the suv's and trucks in the market has shifted the market away from luxury cars, personal luxury coupes in favor of truck and suv production. This was around the time the plant here in Texas shifted from fullsized cars to trucks and suv's. Now they should shift back to more efficient cars and more luxury cars. Luxury cars and medium priced cars can make a profit where small cars cannot. The medium prices cars and luxury cars profit margin would offset the small cars. It would not be a full line brand of course. That was one of the reasons I called for Oldsmobiles return. Oldsmobile would consist of three to four solid vehicles: 98- fullsized traditional luxury car( people are living longer and getting older) Toronado- personal luxury coupe- ( GM does not have one) Custom Cruiser- a true station wagon/ crossover Cutlass Supreme- GM has no midsized coupes front wheel drive or rear drive. Before you start bashing me: Saturn is staying and it is full line Opel North America. I still say drop Outlook..... You cannot keep adding cars to Chevrolet. If Saturn was the green division, they would have given to VOLT to them. They did not. Cadillac is not for everyone in price and structure. It is the higher standard. Pontiac cannot be everything to everyone sitting in the same showroom as Buick. Buick is becoming more like Buick China. That is a different type of luxury. No, the Oldsmobiles would not be in a stand alone showroom either. Sell that at Saturn showrooms to draw people in or Chevrolet showrooms like they did for years anyway.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Drives: 2007 Saturn Aura
Posts: 737
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
Quote:
__________________
Past Rides: 1991 Saturn SC 2001 Mitsubishi Eclipse 2005 Pontiac G6 2000 Pontiac Grand Am 2007 Saturn Aura Future Rides: Saturn Sky/Chevy Camaro/Pontiac G8/Cadillac CTS Coupe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,666
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
Quote:
![]() Personal luxury coupe ![]() Station wagon crossover ![]() Mid-sized coupe ![]() Now you know why Oldsmobile is gone: Pontiac to the left of me, Buick to the right, stuck in the middle with you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,791
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
"Citibank will also help GM assess other options for Hummer, including a possible revamp of the brand's model line-up."
If GM needs bankers to assess brand model line-ups, they're more desperate and incompetent than I thought. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Drives: '07 Corvette Z51
Posts: 1,472
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
LaNeve is a PR hack! I don't take anything he says as gospel.
__________________
GM better hope the Volt is a runaway success, because all the eggs are in that basket!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
Join Date: Aug 2007
Drives: The bailout pkg
Posts: 2,397
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
Good - no Great!!!
Exactly how they should play it. I thank God that everyone from the professional Toyota Spin Doctors to the misguided GM supporters have nothing to do with the decision making process and plan making at GM's HQs. Most of you don't realize how bad the Toyota people are leading you around by the nose.
__________________
" 123" " 1-2-3, oh, that's how elementary it's gonna be -" "There's class warfare, all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning." --Warren Buffet, June 2008 Last edited by AMERICA 123 : 06-24-2008 at 07:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 3,128
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
Isn't Citibank about to go out of business, why are they reviewing Hummer?
__________________
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Dec 2004
Drives: '98 H1 Open-top HMVEE!
'67 Rolls Silver Shadow
'
Posts: 1,040
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
I hope they pay laneve 2 cents/year, he really grates on me- BTW- no 0%, 72 month on the enclave or I would have gone and got one this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,646
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
Dont know how much faith I put in this.
If the market is going the way it is - and they are NOT considering what to do with some of their other brands - then they are not good corporate officers. I'm not saying "Cut this or that" but every option should be on the table if they are seeking to right the ship. I didn't like the idea of cutting Olds - I hated it in fact - but looking back I recognize that it was arguably the right thing to do. I dont like the idea of killing any other brands - but moving forward, if it means killing Hummer, GMC, or any other brand to keep the ship afloat, then they should examine it closely. Just my two cents - and don't know if I take LaNeve at his word.
__________________
Email: nadepalma@gminsidenews.com "La vita è come un albero di Natale..c'è sempre qualcuno che ti rompe le palle!" "You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves" -Abraham Lincoln "Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried" -Winston Churchill "In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm, and three or more is a Congress" -John Adams |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston,Texas
Drives: Oldsmobile Toronado and
Oldsmobile Ninety Eight
Posts: 414
|
Re: LaNeve: 0% for 72 mo; Citi reviewing HUMMER; 09 price hikes; no further brands cu
Never mind. There are too many holes in the arguments against what I said. I knew that was coming.
I will leave it at this: G6 coupe is not even midsized.That car is really not that much larger than Grand Am was ,and Grand Am was classified as compact. If Pontiac got the Alpha platform, that G6 coupe would be smaller. So, technically now and future, GM does not have a midsized coupe. Buick is not producing or selling a coupe now or in the future. Malibu is larger and wider than a G6. A midsized coupe is about the size of the Grand Prix, the departed Monte Carlo. No, GM does not have anything that size. That Riviera concept is smaller than that. I said crossover station/wagon not a TAHOE sized crossover which is what Enclave is. I know when GM got rid of Oldsmobile they push me and other Oldsmobile owners out. They left GM or they went to a competitor or keeping their cars like I have. They did not stay with GM. I will tell you from personal experience, GM does not offer Oldsmobile owners anything anymore. If I wanted a Buick, I would have bought a Park Avenue when I bought my Ninety Eight. What makes you think I would be interested in the Lucerne? That car does not even have many of the features my car has. It is not even the same type of car. If I wanted a Buick, I would have bought a Riviera when I bought my Toronado. Why would I go buy something smaller like a Pontiac G6 that has no where near the room or space or features I have on my car? What you are doing is what GM is doing. You are trying to sell me something I do not want or interested in. Please do not tell me how a Lucerne or a G6 is like buying an Oldsmobile. It is not. That is why GM is in the situation it is now because of thinking and decisions like that. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|