![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
News Contributor
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York
Drives: 2008 Saab 9-5 Sedan
Posts: 4,069
|
GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Link: http://www.autonews.com/article.cms?articleId=53266
---------------------------------------------------------- Automotive News / May 30, 2005 Another hot rumor bites the dust: General Motors won't rely on Toyota technology for its hybrid programs, a top GM r&d exec says. "Nobody knows whether hybrid-vehicle demand will remain at 3 percent of new-car demand or go up to 15 percent," Larry Burns, GM's vice president for r&d, told a Japanese reporter last week. "If the market goes up, we have to develop hybrid technology by ourselves." Rumors have swirled in the Japanese press that GM was near a deal with Toyota Motor Corp. on hybrid technology. The swirl became a frenzy after GM CEO Rick Wagoner and Toyota President Fujio Cho dined privately in Japan two weeks ago. But Burns - who ought to know, since he heads alternative powertrain research at GM - stuck a fork in those rumors last week in a Nihon Keizai Shimbun newspaper interview. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Drives: 2001 Oldsmobile Silhouette
2003 Suzuki XL-7
2005
Posts: 5,050
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Another sign that GM is waiting too long...
__________________
2007 BMW 328i. Black sapphire metallic. Terra leather. Poplar wood. Automatic trans. Xenon adaptive headlights. BMW Assist. Bluetooth. Premium package. Heated seats. iDrive navigation system. Rear sonar. Comfort access. LOGIC7 surround sound. Sirius. 18" BMW wheels. Rear spoiler. 2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara Luxury. Black onyx pearl. Beige leather. 4WD. Chrome hood vents, mirror covers, exhaust. Silver grille, taillight trim. Brushed metal bumper protector. Running boards. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoFla
Drives: 05 Mariner Premier, 98 SLK 230. Both Mercs ;)
Posts: 5,673
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Not good. Hybrid vehicle demand soars
Last edited by SobeSVT : 05-30-2005 at 12:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Drives: V6 3.2 L
Posts: 1,252
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 4,429
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Let me get this straight...When demand goes up to 15% then GM will develop Hybrid powertrains?
Is he kidding??? Already Honda and Toyota have a huge head start with their hybrids. Yes they are not profitable and they are expensive, but this is where the market will go when costs come down further and performance improves. Toyota and Honda are actively working on this and it is hard work. How does GM think it will just jump right in and be competitive 5 or 10 years from now when the Japanese would have already been at it for 2 decades?! Hybrid technology is no simple feat...GM should be working on this full time right now, especially since they want to go at it alone. GM can not afford to yield this market to Toyota. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Just right here
Drives: 1980 'Vette
Posts: 4,972
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
I think that overall, there's more to the story than what is being printed here or in the general press. GM already has the hybrid agreement with DCX. Isn't some of GM's hybrid bus technology supposed to trickle down to passenger car hybrids? And didn't GM recently show off a diesel hybrid that had weight/size characteristics similar to existing engine/tranny combinations?
I don't think the news is all that bad. GM needs to follow through now. Not in 2007, but now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Drives: 2006 Mazda 3
2003 CTS - Sold
Posts: 1,145
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
I really hope GM has something up their sleeve because him saying that they will wait till the demand goes up sounds stupid and the reason Toyota is gaining in sales. People form perceptions about such things and will see Toyota as an Automotive leader and GM as a follower that is second best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoFla
Drives: 05 Mariner Premier, 98 SLK 230. Both Mercs ;)
Posts: 5,673
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Quote:
GM can't afford to yield this market to Toyota...? They already did. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 152
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Quote:
You heard it first right here. The rumor was a propaganda ploy. Hybrids are nontechnology, thery were outdated before they hit the street. GM has the world's most advanced fuel cell technolgoy.
__________________
Behold Supremacy: 06/04/2003, Cadillac beat Lexus in 2 of 3 surveys by AutoPacific, Strategic Vision, and JD Power: http://www.usatoday.com/money/2003-0...utoquality.htm In 2004, "General Motors topped all other automakers in the number of vehicles receiving the highest score in their category, according to the 2004 Total Quality Index (TQI) Awards from automotive consulting firm Strategic Vision." GM leads in 2005: http://autos.msn.com/advice/article....020223&src=GBT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoFla
Drives: 05 Mariner Premier, 98 SLK 230. Both Mercs ;)
Posts: 5,673
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 413
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
i guess in the grand scheme of things, hybrid tech is only a stepping stone until we sufficiently develope a replacement to gas period, so id almost rather GM spent their money elsewhere. somewhere, somehow there has got to be a plentiful, renewable or independant energy source, and i think its time we get smart about our energy habits and aggressively pursue every possible alternative, and focus more on long term gains rather then short term profits and outlooks. the oil industry would rather us invest in hybrid technology then find something else altogether, i know im looking wayy on down the road, but were capable of anything we put our minds too, lets aim for the best, barnone
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 104
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bel-Air, MD
Drives: 2001 Cavalier Z24
Posts: 1,368
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Quote:
__________________
GM autos: the best investments I've ever made ------------------------------------------------------- 1986 chevy cavalier wagon-206,442 miles 1989 oldsmobile cutlass-216,220 miles 2000 chevy cavalier-52,367 miles --totalled ![]() 2001 chevy cavalierZ24-80,654 (Something finally happened! Needed a new battery) So lets see. Toyota lied about recalls. Lied about their HP ratings... I wonder how much truth is in their milage ratings.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,078
|
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"
Right now hybrids are a green smoke screen for toyota as they ramp up production on more thirsty pickups and suvs. If the general could put some available technologies on all of their cars and trucks and gain 2-4 mpg overall, i think it would be a huge coup with far greater environmental benefit to 100k hybrids a year. What if 1 million GM pickups a year got 20mpg+, the impact would be huge.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|