GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-30-2005, 12:13 PM   #1 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York
Drives: 2008 Saab 9-5 Sedan
Posts: 4,069
GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Link: http://www.autonews.com/article.cms?articleId=53266
----------------------------------------------------------
Automotive News / May 30, 2005

Another hot rumor bites the dust:

General Motors won't rely on Toyota technology for its hybrid programs, a top GM r&d exec says.

"Nobody knows whether hybrid-vehicle demand will remain at 3 percent of new-car demand or go up to 15 percent," Larry Burns, GM's vice president for r&d, told a Japanese reporter last week. "If the market goes up, we have to develop hybrid technology by ourselves."

Rumors have swirled in the Japanese press that GM was near a deal with Toyota Motor Corp. on hybrid technology. The swirl became a frenzy after GM CEO Rick Wagoner and Toyota President Fujio Cho dined privately in Japan two weeks ago.

But Burns - who ought to know, since he heads alternative powertrain research at GM - stuck a fork in those rumors last week in a Nihon Keizai Shimbun newspaper interview.
Perian is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-30-2005, 12:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
jro4566's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Drives: 2001 Oldsmobile Silhouette 2003 Suzuki XL-7 2005
Posts: 5,050
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Another sign that GM is waiting too long...
__________________

2007 BMW 328i. Black sapphire metallic. Terra leather. Poplar wood. Automatic trans. Xenon adaptive headlights. BMW Assist. Bluetooth. Premium package. Heated seats. iDrive navigation system. Rear sonar. Comfort access. LOGIC7 surround sound. Sirius. 18" BMW wheels. Rear spoiler.

2006 Suzuki Grand Vitara Luxury. Black onyx pearl. Beige leather. 4WD. Chrome hood vents, mirror covers, exhaust. Silver grille, taillight trim. Brushed metal bumper protector. Running boards.
jro4566 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 12:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
SobeSVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoFla
Drives: 05 Mariner Premier, 98 SLK 230. Both Mercs ;)
Posts: 5,673
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Not good. Hybrid vehicle demand soars

Last edited by SobeSVT : 05-30-2005 at 12:30 PM.
SobeSVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 12:34 PM   #4 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Drives: V6 3.2 L
Posts: 1,252
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Quote:
"Nobody knows whether hybrid-vehicle demand will remain at 3 percent of new-car demand or go up to 15 percent," Larry Burns, GM's vice president for r&d, told a Japanese reporter last week. "If the market goes up, we have to develop hybrid technology by ourselves."
The longer this guy is in charge of GM's R&D and Strategy, the more I worry for GM's future.
Globalist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 12:56 PM   #5 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
atomicshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 4,429
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Let me get this straight...When demand goes up to 15% then GM will develop Hybrid powertrains?

Is he kidding??? Already Honda and Toyota have a huge head start with their hybrids. Yes they are not profitable and they are expensive, but this is where the market will go when costs come down further and performance improves. Toyota and Honda are actively working on this and it is hard work.

How does GM think it will just jump right in and be competitive 5 or 10 years from now when the Japanese would have already been at it for 2 decades?! Hybrid technology is no simple feat...GM should be working on this full time right now, especially since they want to go at it alone. GM can not afford to yield this market to Toyota.
atomicshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 12:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
6.0 Liter LS2 V8
 
plane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Just right here
Drives: 1980 'Vette
Posts: 4,972
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

I think that overall, there's more to the story than what is being printed here or in the general press. GM already has the hybrid agreement with DCX. Isn't some of GM's hybrid bus technology supposed to trickle down to passenger car hybrids? And didn't GM recently show off a diesel hybrid that had weight/size characteristics similar to existing engine/tranny combinations?

I don't think the news is all that bad. GM needs to follow through now. Not in 2007, but now.
plane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 01:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
rueben44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Drives: 2006 Mazda 3 2003 CTS - Sold
Posts: 1,145
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

I really hope GM has something up their sleeve because him saying that they will wait till the demand goes up sounds stupid and the reason Toyota is gaining in sales. People form perceptions about such things and will see Toyota as an Automotive leader and GM as a follower that is second best.
rueben44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 01:10 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 
SobeSVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoFla
Drives: 05 Mariner Premier, 98 SLK 230. Both Mercs ;)
Posts: 5,673
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Quote:
Originally Posted by atomicshark
Let me get this straight...When demand goes up to 15% then GM will develop Hybrid powertrains?

Is he kidding??? Already Honda and Toyota have a huge head start with their hybrids. Yes they are not profitable and they are expensive, but this is where the market will go when costs come down further and performance improves. Toyota and Honda are actively working on this and it is hard work.

How does GM think it will just jump right in and be competitive 5 or 10 years from now when the Japanese would have already been at it for 2 decades?! Hybrid technology is no simple feat...GM should be working on this full time right now, especially since they want to go at it alone. GM can not afford to yield this market to Toyota.
Funny how you failed to mention Ford. Escape Hybrid is a huge hit, Mariner Hybbrid is following in less than a month. Mazda Tribute Hybrid, Fusion and Milan Hybrids are coming nest year. Well . . .

GM can't afford to yield this market to Toyota...? They already did.
SobeSVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 02:31 PM   #9 (permalink)
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
 
surferdude00711's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,703
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

I don't get it; does GM expect a massive DOD intoduction on all of its engines or something?
surferdude00711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 02:48 PM   #10 (permalink)
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
 
CadillacAurora442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 152
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perian
Link: http://www.autonews.com/article.cms?articleId=53266
----------------------------------------------------------
Automotive News / May 30, 2005

Another hot rumor bites the dust:

General Motors won't rely on Toyota technology for its hybrid programs, a top GM r&d exec says.

"Nobody knows whether hybrid-vehicle demand will remain at 3 percent of new-car demand or go up to 15 percent," Larry Burns, GM's vice president for r&d, told a Japanese reporter last week. "If the market goes up, we have to develop hybrid technology by ourselves."

Rumors have swirled in the Japanese press that GM was near a deal with Toyota Motor Corp. on hybrid technology. The swirl became a frenzy after GM CEO Rick Wagoner and Toyota President Fujio Cho dined privately in Japan two weeks ago.

But Burns - who ought to know, since he heads alternative powertrain research at GM - stuck a fork in those rumors last week in a Nihon Keizai Shimbun newspaper interview.

You heard it first right here. The rumor was a propaganda ploy. Hybrids are nontechnology, thery were outdated before they hit the street. GM has the world's most advanced fuel cell technolgoy.
__________________
Behold Supremacy:
06/04/2003, Cadillac beat Lexus in 2 of 3 surveys by AutoPacific, Strategic Vision, and JD Power:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/2003-0...utoquality.htm

In 2004, "General Motors topped all other automakers in the number of vehicles receiving the highest score in their category, according to the 2004 Total Quality Index (TQI) Awards from automotive consulting firm Strategic Vision." GM leads in 2005:
http://autos.msn.com/advice/article....020223&src=GBT
CadillacAurora442 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 03:00 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
 
SobeSVT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoFla
Drives: 05 Mariner Premier, 98 SLK 230. Both Mercs ;)
Posts: 5,673
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Quote:
Originally Posted by CadillacAurora442
GM has the world's most advanced fuel cell technolgoy.
... in what car that I can buy in my local GM dealer?
SobeSVT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 03:03 PM   #12 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 413
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

i guess in the grand scheme of things, hybrid tech is only a stepping stone until we sufficiently develope a replacement to gas period, so id almost rather GM spent their money elsewhere. somewhere, somehow there has got to be a plentiful, renewable or independant energy source, and i think its time we get smart about our energy habits and aggressively pursue every possible alternative, and focus more on long term gains rather then short term profits and outlooks. the oil industry would rather us invest in hybrid technology then find something else altogether, i know im looking wayy on down the road, but were capable of anything we put our minds too, lets aim for the best, barnone
Codester66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 03:05 PM   #13 (permalink)
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 104
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Quote:
Originally Posted by CadillacAurora442
GM has the world's most advanced fuel cell technolgoy.
I belive BMW has a more advanced fuel cell car. Or maybe it's mearly on-par.
GmNation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 03:11 PM   #14 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bel-Air, MD
Drives: 2001 Cavalier Z24
Posts: 1,368
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Quote:
Originally Posted by RCtennis3811
Another sign that GM is waiting too long...
Really I mean what are they waiting for a GD invitation! A hybrid is more than a powertrain option, its a marketing device! You would think that GM could see this... A hybrid anything means you can charge more for it, advertize the #@$@ out of it, and hide your less than efficient models behind it. I know GM is buddying up with DCX on hybrid equipment, but dont say "ugh, yeah, were really not to sure on how that market is going to pan out..." Then wait untill it ballons, then try to get in late only to realize that everyones moving on to the next thing. You can make the market for this! Just make them now!
__________________
GM autos: the best investments I've ever made
-------------------------------------------------------
1986 chevy cavalier wagon-206,442 miles
1989 oldsmobile cutlass-216,220 miles
2000 chevy cavalier-52,367 miles --totalled
2001 chevy cavalierZ24-80,654 (Something finally happened! Needed a new battery)

So lets see. Toyota lied about recalls. Lied about their HP ratings... I wonder how much truth is in their milage ratings..
GMfan2381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 03:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,078
Re: GM > Toyota: "No Thanks On Hybrid Tech"

Right now hybrids are a green smoke screen for toyota as they ramp up production on more thirsty pickups and suvs. If the general could put some available technologies on all of their cars and trucks and gain 2-4 mpg overall, i think it would be a huge coup with far greater environmental benefit to 100k hybrids a year. What if 1 million GM pickups a year got 20mpg+, the impact would be huge.
Cortazzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.