![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#46 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 866
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
Quote:
no, when it comes to CHEAP, AFFORDABLE cars. GM needs to get on it! they have to offer fuel efficient fun and comparably powerful n/a and FI engines in small-midsize vehicles with desirable looks and decent handling and overall performance. THAT IS WHAT GM LACKS. v8s are not the issue. most of GM's V8s get gas mileage as good or better than most much smaller v6s. they need to stop decontenting premium vehicles in pursuit of customers who can't afford them anyway and offer affordable small CHEAP cars that are DESIRABLE. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Richmond, VA
Drives: 2003 Yukon
Posts: 93
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
He's blowing smoke. If they had them, they'd be on the lots.
As far as worring about customer acceptance, has anyone here driven a VW/Audi 2.0T? Fantastic, never believe its a four, tons of torque and power right from throttle tip in all the way to red line, smooth and quiet, all 200hp. I assume the Saab 4 is the same way. And look at the transmissions others are putting out there, GM can't even get the 6 speeds going, never mind the DSGs and CVTs, etc. Come on GM, give us a break, deliver the product. No more excuses, deliver the cars, or close the doors. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: VT
Drives: 03 Vibe GT
Posts: 485
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
How is it that Tom is still the Oracle of wisdom at GM Powertrain - isn't this the same guy that's been trying to convince us for the past 15 years that customers can't really tell the difference between pushrods and OHC? How come they can't downsize this guy and get a leader with some vision?
His CTS example is laughable - Acura TSX's, Audi A4s and A6s, not to mention turbo volvos and Saabs have already proven that the market CAN accept a 4 cylinder luxury car. So here's Tom, 5 years or more after competitors have already done their market tests, had cars in production, and won hundreds of thousands of loyal customers: This strategic thinker has nothing more to say than "4 cylinders might be a little too rough and noisy for a luxury car". Duh? Thanks Tom, where would we be without your insightful grasp of the automotive landscape? Where were you 10 years ago, when spy photographers were talking about the new turbo engines going in Audi's and Saabs, when Acura was planning their 4 cylinder TSX? Shouldn't you have held your hand up at some meeting and said - "you know, we could make our 260 hp ecotec a little quieter, so we can go play with the big boys... GM seems to like playing it safe by making sure there's plenty of buyers for all its cars. They used to be a full line manufacturer. You'd think with 8 brands or whatever, some of those could actually sell a 4 cylinder luxury car without cheapening the Cadillac name. Maybe one could actually sell a minivan, or an AWD sport sedan, or an AWD hatchback, or a small fuel efficient car that nobody thinks would sell in the US. Hell, I don't even care if they take some Suzukis and slap the GM chiclet on them and peddle them as Pontiac Tron-cycles. They're supposedly a global company now and all we get is 5 versions of the same car, while hyundai is coming out with a supersedan that they sell right next to the Accent. I also think his example gets away from the main problem - Honda and Toyota have made billions selling very fuel efficient cars to people who are willing to give up speed, space, comfort, and utility in exchange for fuel economy. GM is trying to sell about a 1000 Tahoes to people who were told GM invented a free lunch. Who do you think is going to be more passionate about their cars? GM needs to realize that their cars are not at the center of the market, especially since the market has shifted decidedly smaller over the past 5 years. They need to stop pretending that most people need the largish, heavyish cars that they are selling, even in the few segments they still participate in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the Galactica CIC
Drives: 2005 Chevy Malibu
Posts: 2,559
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
Here's the signal that GM has been waiting for...
![]()
__________________
"The best committee is the committee of one" -Bob Lutz |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 805
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
Quote:
if fuel was hard to get and there was gas lines like i lived thru in the 70s it may be a different story. wait till both the state and federal govt raise the gasoline tax,the feds are talking about it already because people are using less gasoline and they need the money,you are never going to win.
__________________
chevy owner since 1953,30 new chevys and 11 new corvettes since 1959 ,# 11 2008 corvette in the garage ,2004 impala,1988 2500 silverado,former NASCAR tech inspector,retired race engine builder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) | |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 169
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
Quote:
His point what that GM doesn't offer a competitive, CHEAP, ECONOMY car. No one ever said that GM didn't build relatively fuel-efficient EXPENSIVE cars (Corvette, pickups, Tahoes are all relatively fuel efficient for their class). But GM can't survive making 30,000 Corvettes a year. Plus, I would never call a Honda a s--t box. The Fit is a fun little car for the money (1/3 the cost of your Vette). For the past 20 years, Honda's have been much nicer than anything GM could come up with at the same price. Hell, my wife's 95 Civic was nicer and a much better ride than my 2000 Grand Am. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 805
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
Quote:
__________________
chevy owner since 1953,30 new chevys and 11 new corvettes since 1959 ,# 11 2008 corvette in the garage ,2004 impala,1988 2500 silverado,former NASCAR tech inspector,retired race engine builder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,951
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
Did Chrysler wait for consumers to tell them that they were ready for the minivan? Did Ford wait till customers suggested that a more aerodynamic design that came about with the segment-busting Taurus was what they wanted? Did Ford wait till customers told it they wanted a mid-sized sport utility, thus ushering in the multi-billion dollar former profit machine, the Explorer? Did Lexus wait till customers said that they were ready for a Japanese luxury brand?
I'm trying to remember why these people earn the money that I'm sure they earn. Christ, almighty, what exactly doesn't GM get here?! Isn't GM allegedly changing its ways and looking globally when designing vehicles? Don't many consumers in other nations prefer smaller displacement engines in their cars, even in luxury machines? Shouldn't a global Cadillac already be motivated by a mere four cylinders? |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hunterdon Co., NJ
Drives: 2004 Scion xB
Posts: 1,557
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
We could use, or could've used, the Corsa that's shown behind him.
__________________
-"Rose, were you able to find a caterer for the banquet, yet?" -"No, not yet. Oh, but I did find out that Baked Alaska can actually be made locally!" -"Rose, I have an even bigger scoop for you. Mars Bars are made right here on Earth!" G.G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) | |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 805
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
$3500
Quote:
__________________
chevy owner since 1953,30 new chevys and 11 new corvettes since 1959 ,# 11 2008 corvette in the garage ,2004 impala,1988 2500 silverado,former NASCAR tech inspector,retired race engine builder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the Galactica CIC
Drives: 2005 Chevy Malibu
Posts: 2,559
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
Quote:
Preach it brother.
__________________
"The best committee is the committee of one" -Bob Lutz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 805
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
car buyers make no sense as i remember people paying extra the get a VW bug when gas was $.30 a gallon. some people just want to make a statement like $25K prius buyers because the saving in fuel cost over a $12K regular 4 cylinder car will take years to even out.
__________________
chevy owner since 1953,30 new chevys and 11 new corvettes since 1959 ,# 11 2008 corvette in the garage ,2004 impala,1988 2500 silverado,former NASCAR tech inspector,retired race engine builder |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Sep 2007
Drives: '06 Saturn Vue
Posts: 572
|
Re: GM Ready for Smaller Engines When Customers Are
July 31, 2008
Dear General Motors Corporation, I just wanted to take a moment of your time and let you know that I am ready for smaller engines in my future GM vehicles. Of course, I'm not sure exactly what I will be buying to replace my current GM vehicle (a 2006 Saturn Vue) so I can not give you exact information on which GM model you should put the smaller engines into. I was thinking it would be wonderful if you gave consumers a choice of engines on most models. In fact, I think you already do this with a lot of your products. Hey, maybe this could be as simple as replacing your current small engine offering with a smaller displacement higher tech engine. Consumer love hi tech stuff like turbos, direct injection and Variable Valve Timing.... even if most of us don't know what it is these things do. Sincerely, Joe Consumer
__________________
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|