GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2009, 02:53 PM   #31 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
TJ95GAGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: DE
Drives: 09 G8 GT
Posts: 1,010
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stovebolt View Post
No, it isn't. Taxpayer money is always taxpayer money. Unless it's freely given for a service rendered, it's held in trust by the government for the public good. It is NOT "their" money, no more than a thief stealing from you makes it "his." I EARN my employer's wages. The government has not earned that money. It's a simple distinction. Not to mention, if that employer no longer wishes to pay me, he can fire me. I cannot fire my government, as much as I'd like to.

Oh, and it's also rotten, borderline treasonous Michigan Democrats who decided they could freeload off of the D3 for several decades and strangled the economy through high taxes and regulation.
The road your drive on, the school children go to, the police/fire fighters that respond, welfare, the security of America,etc. - all services. Security of America includes financial aswell, care to guess where the unemployement rate would be if GM was to go bye bye?

You have choices and can fire the government, move to another country. You always have choices.

And if you think you pay alot of taxes now, take a look back at historical tax rates.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamJet502 View Post
Its OUR money, not the Governments! The Government is supposed to be representative of the people, not an independent entity.
Like it or not they are elected officials so you can complain about it. Sometimes they may not make a popular choice BUT hopefully they are making the choices right the US/State/County they represent, even at the displeasure of some. I don't think I'd like to see what would have been if the government didn't step in and help the banks and GM.

Last edited by TJ95GAGT : 07-02-2009 at 02:56 PM.
TJ95GAGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-02-2009, 04:06 PM   #32 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Greer, SC
Drives: 2006 GTO M6 2006 Envoy Denali 2007 BMW 328i Conv
Posts: 121
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

I have no problem with the states giving tax incentives and land deals along with training and employment services to attract new industries. I am sure GM could have gotten the same deal VW got to move to TN. They, however, decided to try to extort up front money from them and I can see in this economy how any state would be reluctant to write a check for $250 million on the hopes the new arrival would be a success. GM of anyone except for Chrysler do not have a good track record in that respect. Besides TN already paid for Spring Hill once. What do they say,"fool me once, fool me twice".
Get the picture. For once an elected official did the public right.
msitter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 04:42 PM   #33 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
Gm_Tooler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Drives: Silverado
Posts: 1,122
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsbaker View Post
Volkswagen is getting a total of about $500,000,000 in tax abatement free land & training and infrastructure improvements to build in Tennessee. I don't know why GM can't get what its asking for.
GM/SH got all the goodies from TN when they were a greenfield site. And more when they retooled for the Traverse. And also an offer of more to bring in the b/c cars. I can't see where VW was given an advantage. They just happened to strike a deal when the economy was in better shape.

The more I read on this, I think GM was planning on Orion the whole time. By creating a bidding war they made downtrodden MI feel like lottery winners. Only they had to pay for the prize.
Gm_Tooler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 05:13 PM   #34 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
RamJet502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 4,461
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by TJ95GAGT View Post
Like it or not they are elected officials so you can complain about it. Sometimes they may not make a popular choice BUT hopefully they are making the choices right the US/State/County they represent, even at the displeasure of some. I don't think I'd like to see what would have been if the government didn't step in and help the banks and GM.
I'm glad you have so much faith in a group of people only concerned with lining their own pockets and winning re-elections. If you think I'm overstating the situation; I'll point out the rampant lobbying (legalized bribery) and pork-barrel spending (nothing more than quid pro quo for the people who helped them buy their election). The corruption is systemic in both parties and none of them deserve a dime of OUR money.
__________________
RamJet502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 05:40 PM   #35 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,126
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1G6 View Post
You mean the rotten, borderline treasonous politics played by the southern Republicans?

They should grind that plant to dust and scatter the mess on Corker's yard.
Oh stuff it. The Detroit automakers cooked their own goose. Southern Republicans never caused the problems. I know you think taxpayers owe automakers a living in perpetuity but you should be grateful for the generosity taxpayers have been forced to commit to.
stormwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 05:45 PM   #36 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,126
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-1 View Post
Once the money has been paid to the gov't, it is no longer "taxpayer money," it's the gov't's money. Would you like it if your employer told you how to spend your wages?
"Government money"?? There is no such thing. Governments only exist by taxing the productive economic activity of taxpayers.

Or borrowing from the Chinese.
stormwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 06:26 PM   #37 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Drives: 2008 Ford Escape Limited 2006 Ford Focus ZX4
Posts: 1,591
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC12MANY View Post
You mean 'Senator Millionaires'(forbes 2006) $1.7 million place, where they wined and dined the VW execs to consumate the $600 million give away? Ohh don't get me started.
So Sen. Corker EARNED his money as a small business man and that's a bad thing? 90% of the career lawyer polititions in dc, earned their money via lobbyists bribes.

Sen. Corker's plan was the right plan for everyone and wouldn't have screwed over bondholders. Good Luck GM getting any future bondholders to prop you up; you've already soiled them drawers!

Now the question is Spring Hill part of "Good GM" or "Bad GM"? If they are Good GM, they will get future Lambda work, count on it. If not, then the Government will sell Spring Hill plant to VW/Audi (looking for a second plant) or hyundia for pennies on the dollar.
gardnet1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 06:43 PM   #38 (permalink)
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
 
PistonsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Drives: 08 CTS
Posts: 949
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by RamJet502 View Post
That's really too bad, until GM gets out of Detroit the culture of mediocrity will continue. The attempted extortion of non-union states seems idiotic, GM should be wining and dining Tennessee and Wisconsin.
Please do elaborate on both points.
__________________
PistonsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 06:55 PM   #39 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
RamJet502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 4,461
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by PistonsFan View Post
Please do elaborate on both points.
Detroit is the problem, stuck in the past with powerful obsolete unions.

(I'm not including the Red Wings in Detroit's mediocrity)
__________________

Last edited by RamJet502 : 07-02-2009 at 06:57 PM.
RamJet502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 09:17 PM   #40 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
Gm_Tooler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Drives: Silverado
Posts: 1,122
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by gardnet1 View Post
So Sen. Corker EARNED his money as a small business man and that's a bad thing? 90% of the career lawyer polititions in dc, earned their money via lobbyists bribes.

Sen. Corker's plan was the right plan for everyone and wouldn't have screwed over bondholders. Good Luck GM getting any future bondholders to prop you up; you've already soiled them drawers!

Now the question is Spring Hill part of "Good GM" or "Bad GM"? If they are Good GM, they will get future Lambda work, count on it. If not, then the Government will sell Spring Hill plant to VW/Audi (looking for a second plant) or hyundia for pennies on the dollar.
Did I miss something? Didn't corker want a 2/3 reduction in bondholder debt? I recall them not being too happy at the time.


Quote:
Originally Posted by RamJet502 View Post
Detroit is the problem, stuck in the past with powerful obsolete unions.

(I'm not including the Red Wings in Detroit's mediocrity)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RamJet502 View Post
That's really too bad, until GM gets out of Detroit the culture of mediocrity will continue. The attempted extortion of non-union states seems idiotic, GM should be wining and dining Tennessee and Wisconsin.
There were still unions in WI and TN last time I checked. Staying stuck in the past with a mediocre mindset can be a problem too.
Gm_Tooler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:19 PM   #41 (permalink)
Walking
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Middle Tenn.
Drives: 2004 Ranger
Posts: 11
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gm_Tooler View Post
GM/SH got all the goodies from TN when they were a greenfield site. And more when they retooled for the Traverse. And also an offer of more to bring in the b/c cars. I can't see where VW was given an advantage. They just happened to strike a deal when the economy was in better shape.

The more I read on this, I think GM was planning on Orion the whole time. By creating a bidding war they made downtrodden MI feel like lottery winners. Only they had to pay for the prize.
My thinking also. I believe GM planned to keep the small car in Mich. from the beginning. They just hoped to start a bidding war between the desperate states needing employment . It was a win win deal for GM EITHER WAY !!
MR_KEMO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:01 AM   #42 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
SCCA1995's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: M'boro, TN
Drives: 2009 HSV Maloo R8 (in my mind, of course)
Posts: 1,182
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1G6 View Post
You mean the rotten, borderline treasonous politics played by the southern Republicans?

They should grind that plant to dust and scatter the mess on Corker's yard.
Corker had nothing to do with the extortion by GM.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DC12MANY View Post
You mean 'Senator Millionaires'(forbes 2006) $1.7 million place, where they wined and dined the VW execs to consumate the $600 million give away? Ohh don't get me started.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rsbaker View Post
Volkswagen is getting a total of about $500,000,000 in tax abatement free land & training and infrastructure improvements to build in Tennessee. I don't know why GM can't get what its asking for.
Do either of you have links to support your claim of $500-600M that was "given away" by the state government of TN? I'll do you 1 better. I have 2 links. One mentions the wining & dining at Corker's home, but both mention that VW will be "investing ~$1B into the local economy".
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2...lant-decision/
http://www.chattanoogachamber.com/en...mationPage.asp

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsbaker View Post
Pardon my French but that's B*** S***. Volkswagen has no monopoly on virtue. They will build in whichever state writes the biggest check. I'll stick to my original statement. Tennessee should cough up just as much money for GM as they did for VW.
OK, when you get elected to a high ranking political office, let's see you pull $200M out of your a**. Should taxpayers just go along with that idea? No. GM made no mention that there would be more jobs needed to build the small car if it was awarded to SH. At least with VW coming in, people will be hired in that were previously unemployed or at lower paying or less satisfying jobs.
__________________


Photos & videos
SCCA1995 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:16 AM   #43 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
Gm_Tooler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Drives: Silverado
Posts: 1,122
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCCA1995 View Post
...........GM made no mention that there would be more jobs needed to build the small car if it was awarded to SH. At least with VW coming in, people will be hired in that were previously unemployed or at lower paying or less satisfying jobs.
Keeping existing jobs has value and merit too. But SH would have still lost 800 or so of the best paying jobs even if they had won.
Gm_Tooler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 12:32 AM   #44 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Worcester MA.
Drives: 2005 Chevy Monte Carlo
Posts: 171
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokl View Post
yea yukon and suburban are big sellers. What do they sell 1k of each of them per month. Yea it is a high volume vehicle. Those truck and suv's have been loosing sales since 2003 look at the difference in sales of silverado and camry it is almost 1 to 1 few years ago it was 7 to 1. And there are a lot more mid size cars then trucks. So Americans are running away from big vehicles.
I disagree. Camry sales have rose at mostly the expense of other car models(Ford Taurus anyone), not at the expense of Silverado sales. Americans are running away from new vehicle purchases in general, not trucks in particular.
BigC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2009, 01:23 AM   #45 (permalink)
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
 
Hunid Racks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 760
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Of course Tennessee can't "afford it."

Nissan already stole all the money.
Hunid Racks is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.