![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: DE
Drives: 09 G8 GT
Posts: 1,010
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
You have choices and can fire the government, move to another country. You always have choices. And if you think you pay alot of taxes now, take a look back at historical tax rates. Like it or not they are elected officials so you can complain about it. Sometimes they may not make a popular choice BUT hopefully they are making the choices right the US/State/County they represent, even at the displeasure of some. I don't think I'd like to see what would have been if the government didn't step in and help the banks and GM. Last edited by TJ95GAGT : 07-02-2009 at 02:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Greer, SC
Drives: 2006 GTO M6
2006 Envoy Denali
2007 BMW 328i Conv
Posts: 121
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
I have no problem with the states giving tax incentives and land deals along with training and employment services to attract new industries. I am sure GM could have gotten the same deal VW got to move to TN. They, however, decided to try to extort up front money from them and I can see in this economy how any state would be reluctant to write a check for $250 million on the hopes the new arrival would be a success. GM of anyone except for Chrysler do not have a good track record in that respect. Besides TN already paid for Spring Hill once. What do they say,"fool me once, fool me twice".
Get the picture. For once an elected official did the public right. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Drives: Silverado
Posts: 1,122
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
The more I read on this, I think GM was planning on Orion the whole time. By creating a bidding war they made downtrodden MI feel like lottery winners. Only they had to pay for the prize. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 4,461
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
__________________
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,126
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Oh stuff it. The Detroit automakers cooked their own goose. Southern Republicans never caused the problems. I know you think taxpayers owe automakers a living in perpetuity but you should be grateful for the generosity taxpayers have been forced to commit to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter L76 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,126
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
Or borrowing from the Chinese. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Drives: 2008 Ford Escape Limited
2006 Ford Focus ZX4
Posts: 1,591
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
Sen. Corker's plan was the right plan for everyone and wouldn't have screwed over bondholders. Good Luck GM getting any future bondholders to prop you up; you've already soiled them drawers! Now the question is Spring Hill part of "Good GM" or "Bad GM"? If they are Good GM, they will get future Lambda work, count on it. If not, then the Government will sell Spring Hill plant to VW/Audi (looking for a second plant) or hyundia for pennies on the dollar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Drives: 2001 Chevy Silverado
Posts: 4,461
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Detroit is the problem, stuck in the past with powerful obsolete unions.
(I'm not including the Red Wings in Detroit's mediocrity)
__________________
![]() ![]()
Last edited by RamJet502 : 07-02-2009 at 06:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | ||
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Drives: Silverado
Posts: 1,122
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Walking
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern Middle Tenn.
Drives: 2004 Ranger
Posts: 11
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |||
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: M'boro, TN
Drives: 2009 HSV Maloo R8 (in my mind, of course)
Posts: 1,182
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/2...lant-decision/ http://www.chattanoogachamber.com/en...mationPage.asp OK, when you get elected to a high ranking political office, let's see you pull $200M out of your a**. Should taxpayers just go along with that idea? No. GM made no mention that there would be more jobs needed to build the small car if it was awarded to SH. At least with VW coming in, people will be hired in that were previously unemployed or at lower paying or less satisfying jobs. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Worcester MA.
Drives: 2005 Chevy Monte Carlo
Posts: 171
|
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|