GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2009, 09:07 AM   #1 (permalink)
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
 
'Vette Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Concord, Ohio
Posts: 1,892
GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

NASHVILLE, Tenn.—Tennessee Gov. Phil Bredesen said Wednesday that Tennessee wouldn't have met General Motors' cash requirements to build a small car at its Spring Hill plant even if the state's finances were in better shape.

GM last week selected a facility near Detroit to assemble small and compact cars over two other finalists in Tennessee and Wisconsin.

Bredesen told The Associated Press after a groundbreaking ceremony for a highway project in Nashville that GM had wanted "north of $250 million" in upfront money to select Spring Hill.

"That that was not even remotely in the range of something we could do at this time -- or would really even do on this project even if times were good," the Democratic governor said.

Bredesen said the state offered about $20 million in training and education money in addition to long-term tax breaks.

"GM made it clear when we were talking with them that they didn't care much about those things, what they really cared about was how much cash you could put up on the front end," he said.

GM's choice of the Orion Township, Mich., site leaves the future of about 2,500 employees at the Spring Hill plant uncertain when it stops making the Chevrolet Traverse around Thanksgiving.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/eur...in_good_times/
__________________


GMI Folding@Home
'Vette Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-02-2009, 09:10 AM   #2 (permalink)
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
 
'Vette Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Concord, Ohio
Posts: 1,892
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

So here is why Spring Hill lost even though it made a lot of sense to build it there. I heard many GMI members saying that Spring Hill would lose because of Politics. They were right.
__________________


GMI Folding@Home
'Vette Dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 09:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
plane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Banned
Posts: 5,176
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Orion didn't pony up $250 million.
It was a 100% 25 year waiver on sales tax.

I wonder if there was politics involved in this decision?
__________________
A successful man is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at him.
David Brinkley
plane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 09:42 AM   #4 (permalink)
Editor-in-Chief
Premium Member
 
nsap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT
Posts: 17,720
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Let's think about this for a second...

Regardless of which plant was going to get it, said plant was going to need retooling and updating. Spring Hill is not exactly in the tip-top shape the governor was making it out to be. Current capacity is only 190K units per year, that is not enough to build the cars they wanted to build...so it is obvious improvements were in order if SH was to be selected.

On the flip side of this, Spring Hill has all-new tooling in place to build the Chevrolet Traverse, a Lambda-based product. GM has a few new Lambdas coming, in addition to (supposed) increased volume in the current Lambdas, and needs more capacity....Hmm... It would seem to make sense that the new Lambda's go to SH, sort of like my sources told me last week....
__________________

Get the latest news from GMI...Join the "GMInsidenews.com Facebook Page!!
Follow me on TWITTER
E-Mail Me
nsap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 10:20 AM   #5 (permalink)
1G6
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
 
1G6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In a marshmallow slop barge.
Posts: 1,779
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Vette Dude View Post
So here is why Spring Hill lost even though it made a lot of sense to build it there. I heard many GMI members saying that Spring Hill would lose because of Politics. They were right.
You mean the rotten, borderline treasonous politics played by the southern Republicans?

They should grind that plant to dust and scatter the mess on Corker's yard.
__________________
Considering a Toyota? Think again.

1976 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham
1976 Cadillac Coupe deVille
1979 Cadillac Sedan deVille
1986 Buick Electra Estate Wagon
1992 Buick Roadmaster
2008 Buick Lucerne CXL


Gone, but not forgotten
1972 Pontiac Bonneville 455
1976 Chevrolet C-10
1994 Oldsmobile Eighty Eight LSS
1997 Oldsmobile Regency
1998 Chevrolet Malibu
2000 Cadillac Deville DTS
2001 Chrysler 300M
2001 Chrysler Sebring Coupe
2005 Cadillac CTS
1G6 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 10:27 AM   #6 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
plane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Banned
Posts: 5,176
Post Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsap View Post
GM has a few new Lambdas coming, in addition to (supposed) increased volume in the current Lambdas, and needs more capacity....
GM already has -
Enclave
Acadia
Traverse
[Outlook?]

What's next?

A Cadillac Lambda?
Hybrid versions?
Moving the 900s to Lambda?
__________________
A successful man is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at him.
David Brinkley
plane is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 10:28 AM   #7 (permalink)
Editor-in-Chief
Premium Member
 
nsap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Drives: 2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT
Posts: 17,720
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by plane View Post
GM already has -
Enclave
Acadia
Traverse
[Outlook?]

What's next?

A Cadillac Lambda?
Hybrid versions?
Moving the 900s to Lambda?
Chevrolet Lambda SUT
Cadillac Escalade


Then of course, the all-new Acadia, Traverse, and Enclave...slated for 2012.
__________________

Get the latest news from GMI...Join the "GMInsidenews.com Facebook Page!!
Follow me on TWITTER
E-Mail Me
nsap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Bokl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 412
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsap View Post
Chevrolet Lambda SUT
Cadillac Escalade


Then of course, the all-new Acadia, Traverse, and Enclave...slated for 2012.
Here we go again. New gm is really same old gm. And i have a feeling gm will end up in chapter 11 again if it ever gets out from this one. Lets give same vehicle to all of your devisions and sell one for 30k and all the way up to 70k. Nothing has changed.
Then when you ask GM CEO to give g8 to chevy he said we are against rebadging. Wow

Last edited by Bokl : 07-02-2009 at 11:26 AM.
Bokl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:30 AM   #9 (permalink)
K-1
4.4 Liter Supercharged Northstar
 
K-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Drives: 2008 Saturn ASTRA 5dr XR 2009 Saturn AURA XE
Posts: 2,579
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bokl View Post
Here we go again. New gm is really same old gm. And i have a feeling gm will end up in chapter 11 again if it ever gets out from this one. Lets give same vehicle to all of your devisions and sell one for 30k and all the way up to 70k. Nothing has changed.
How does that differ from anyone else with a mainstream division? Toyota/Lexus does it, Honda/Acura does it, Ford/Lincoln does it, Volkswagen/Audi does it, hell Kia/Hyundai does it. Ideally, GMC should fold, but it's only one vehicle over everyone else.
__________________
2008 Saturn ASTRA 5-door XR - Sandstone - Me
2009 Saturn AURA XE - Quicksilver - Wife
2009 Maclaren Quest Sport Stroller - Black/Champagne - Son
2008 Radio Flyer Sport Trike - Classic Red - Son
2008 Fisher-Price Power Wheels Lil' Kawasaki ATV - Green/Yellow - Son
K-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:35 AM   #10 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
2648562's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,251
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsap View Post
Chevrolet Lambda SUT
Cadillac Escalade


Then of course, the all-new Acadia, Traverse, and Enclave...slated for 2012.
All-new in 2012??? Seriously? I thought there was just talk of adding the Escalade.
2648562 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:35 AM   #11 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Bokl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 412
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-1 View Post
How does that differ from anyone else with a mainstream division? Toyota/Lexus does it, Honda/Acura does it, Ford/Lincoln does it, Volkswagen/Audi does it, hell Kia/Hyundai does it. Ideally, GMC should fold, but it's only one vehicle over everyone else.
it is different because you have Highlinder/RX, Pilton/ MDX. THey do not have Traversa/Acadia/Enclave/ new escalade/ chevy sut. see the difference. It only should be Traversa/Enclave not everything else. This is why old gm is new gm. If caddy is going to be FWD cars and suv's why even bother and keep buick. There will be no difference between them. Well maybe there will caddy will have more chrome.

Last edited by Bokl : 07-02-2009 at 11:37 AM.
Bokl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:41 AM   #12 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
Gm_Tooler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Drives: Silverado
Posts: 1,122
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

The state of TN has treated GM well over the years. And I think Gov. Bredesen's reasoning is sound. I want SH to prosper, but waiting a bit longer may prove better in the long run.
Gm_Tooler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:45 AM   #13 (permalink)
2.5L Iron Duke
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 28
Red face Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1G6 View Post
You mean the rotten, borderline treasonous politics played by the southern Republicans?

They should grind that plant to dust and scatter the mess on Corker's yard.
You mean 'Senator Millionaires'(forbes 2006) $1.7 million place, where they wined and dined the VW execs to consumate the $600 million give away? Ohh don't get me started.
DC12MANY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:50 AM   #14 (permalink)
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
 
CamaroCrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Cary, NC
Drives: 1994 Camaro Z28 2000 Camaro
Posts: 734
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by K-1 View Post
How does that differ from anyone else with a mainstream division? Toyota/Lexus does it, Honda/Acura does it, Ford/Lincoln does it, Volkswagen/Audi does it, hell Kia/Hyundai does it. Ideally, GMC should fold, but it's only one vehicle over everyone else.
GMC sells. Its just that simple. As much as the media or some loud mouths try to make it out, Americans like big vehicles. This Chevy Spark/Viva stuff is going to make all the politicians and environmentalists hot and excited, but when the stuff doesn't sell and people keep buying Acadias and Yukons, there's going to be problems.
__________________


Webshots: My Camaros, the Camaro Concepts, and the Sunoco Camaro in action at VIR

The Typical Honda/Toyota driver: You are bland and boring and risk-averse. Not to mention you could care less about buying a foreign junk car. These are dependable cars, no doubt, but lack any substance or style. Crappy handling and worse styling. Screams "I have no style or class and live a boring, meager existence. Please let me get over into the exit lane." ~ Posted by Steve11115555 on Forbes.com
CamaroCrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2009, 11:57 AM   #15 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
Bokl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 412
Re: GM Price Too High For Spring Hill

Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroCrazy View Post
GMC sells. Its just that simple. As much as the media or some loud mouths try to make it out, Americans like big vehicles. This Chevy Spark/Viva stuff is going to make all the politicians and environmentalists hot and excited, but when the stuff doesn't sell and people keep buying Acadias and Yukons, there's going to be problems.
yea yukon and suburban are big sellers. What do they sell 1k of each of them per month. Yea it is a high volume vehicle. Those truck and suv's have been loosing sales since 2003 look at the difference in sales of silverado and camry it is almost 1 to 1 few years ago it was 7 to 1. And there are a lot more mid size cars then trucks. So Americans are running away from big vehicles.
Bokl is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.