![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#182 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2004 Chevy Silverado Z71;
1987 Plymouth Reliant
Posts: 8,042
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Quote:
![]() Back to it. My first thought was it was a terrible idea, then I thought there could be some upsides...but I'm afraid it'll be exactly as you describe. ![]()
__________________
Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus Aut viam inveniam aut faciam If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find him, maybe you can hire Uzzy. 'Ich bin ein Detroiter' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#184 (permalink) |
|
1.4 Liter Turbocharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Indiana
Drives: 1996 Buick Riviera
Posts: 84
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
seriously, it's kind of embarrassing.
But on the subjet matter, i honestly don't mind, but as long as all the GM brands stay, and the others get obsolved into the existing. I liked the idea of HUMMER being turned into Jeep, but everybody wants to kill off Pontiac, thats just not right.
__________________
Buick, The American Riviera Happy Thanksgiving! Present Ride: 1996, Adriatic Blue, Buick Riviera GM Designer Hopeful. 6 years to wait. The magic starts now, Ready! SET! GM!! Updated: 11-6-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
#185 (permalink) | |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Great Lakes Road Warrior
Drives: '10 Corolla - Where's the Chevy CRUZE?!?
Posts: 610
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Quote:
Gm should kill off the crappy Chryslers but keep the minivan, Jeep (Wrangler, GC, Liberty combined with HUMMER H3 & H3T), and maybe the RAM (or at least it's new rear suspension). Don't kill Pontiac, make it the performance brand it deserves to be...even if it has a few MOPARS in the mix...as long as the interior are redone. Chrysler interiors are really sub-par! ![]()
__________________
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." -- Albert Einstein Last edited by killerrd2 : 10-20-2008 at 01:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#186 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint-Petersburg
Drives: Chevrolet Cruze 1.8 MT
Carbon Flash
Posts: 39
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
![]() caleb02 - Share your dealer's number I wanna try the same stuff you take.2 all This guy is trolling, dont pay attention ![]() Seriously - where is the logic in English system? 12 inches - foot 3 feet - yard? 2000 yard = mile? or smth like this? it is much more comfortable than this stupid metric system, yeah ![]() 10mm = 1 cm= 0.01m and go on... whats the stupid sense ![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#187 (permalink) |
|
Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: France
Drives: 2006 Yamaha YBR 125
1990 Citroën Ax
Posts: 14,550
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Where does all this faith for Pontiac come from? It's my favourite brand, but I am 100% convinced that GM only keeps it around because they still do decent volume (mostly fleet) with it. The Torrent still exists... the Cobalt comes in a higher performance version than the G5... the G6 is the sick, unloved cousin of the much better Aura and Malibu... the Aveo-clone G3 is on its way... what more proof do we need that GM doesn't have any intention of doing anything interesting with Pontiac?
__________________
It's been swell, but the swelling's gone down. |
|
|
|
|
|
#188 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 52
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
So, should we invade them and pry their meter sticks from their cold, dead fingers or would it be OK just to send a snarky note?
Last edited by DonRobbie : 10-20-2008 at 07:29 AM. Reason: has word order issues Yoda does |
|
|
|
|
|
#189 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,148
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
I would send them a stern warning first then i would use the full might of America.. We could then send over Michael Moore first and if that does not work we can send over all of our illegal immigrants to them.... If that does not work we could just manipulate their stock market to crash like they have done to ours. Some people believe that the stock dive was due to economic terrorism. GM, and Ford should use their vast legions of follower to find out who is responsible for the nose dive and then make them drive a ford pinto or a caddy cimmeron.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#190 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,148
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#191 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2004 Chevy Silverado Z71;
1987 Plymouth Reliant
Posts: 8,042
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
If by some people, you mean you and the voice in your head, then you are correct.
__________________
Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus Aut viam inveniam aut faciam If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find him, maybe you can hire Uzzy. 'Ich bin ein Detroiter' |
|
|
|
|
|
#192 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,148
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Quote:
now id GM buys a division or two or three of chrysler is say we keep GMC (merged with Chevy), Dodge/Jeep (jeep if not sold to Renault/Nissan), and then Chrysler (saab and caddy merged into Chrysler) Last edited by Caleb02 : 10-20-2008 at 07:50 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#193 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,148
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Quote:
3' = yard what is so hard to remember about that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#194 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,148
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Quote:
i gave up coffee when i was 9 years old in favor of Jolt Cola!, I am now 37 years old and love to drink this stuff along with Coke Cola and Pepsi and then eat a ton of Mcdonalds Double Quarter Pounders with supersize fries. and i still about 160 pounds and i still dont gain an pound! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jolt_Cola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#195 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Drives: 08 CTS
Posts: 941
|
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger
Where do I start...
First of all, people keep talking about getting rid of auto brands like it's no big deal. It is very costly to get rid of a brand. GM learned this painful process when they dumped Oldsmobile. They have NO intentions of cutting other brands. They are only considering the sale of Hummer because it is almost an independent brand and it won't be too painful to remove it from the dealer network. Also, people are talking about taking Chrysler models and dumping them into GM brands. That wouldn't happen either. A top-down consolidation into GM is not a good idea at all. They would likely keep Chrysler as separate entity (like SAAB) and cut the redundant positions. Technology development costs would be reduced substantially. Cutting diesel development and buying Cummins engines for GM trucks? What? NO! Legal contract issues aside, it would be more likely that GM would use the 6.6 and 4.5 liter Duramax engines in the Dodge trucks. It would be a nice jump in volume for these engines. GM buying engines from Cummins... don't think so. As for cutting diesel development within GM... Not gonna happen. Regardless of what happens with Diesel in North America, Diesel engines will be crucial in the developing countries. Diesel engines don't need thousands of dollars of extra technology in other countries that have lower/no emission standards.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|