GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

[fp115]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

since when was the epa right about anything? I use the actual people who make the cars and trucks the auto company!

Because the EPA tests all the cars evenly and the manufacturers use EPA's ratings. You need a wake up call.

[fp115]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

the metric system is the first line of attack by socialist and communists alike. Thank god in the 1980's congress under the 2nd greatest president Ronald Regan, Bush is the 1st greatest president) repealed the metric system from ever taking place. I would sonner die then switch to the metric system and as i told my teachers and professors, this is america and we use the english system! We are the worlds greatest country on the face of the planet. and the other countries need to follow our lead or elsw those countries may face the full wrath of America!

I feel sorry for you, very sorry.

[civilzues]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

the metric system is the first line of attack by socialist and communists alike. Thank god in the 1980's congress under the 2nd greatest president Ronald Regan, Bush is the 1st greatest president) repealed the metric system from ever taking place. I would sonner die then switch to the metric system and as i told my teachers and professors, this is america and we use the english system! We are the worlds greatest country on the face of the planet. and the other countries need to follow our lead or elsw those countries may face the full wrath of America!

we should switch over to the metric system. It's easier all you have to do it move the decimal place over one. look, you've not been taught how to convert everything in the metric system.
*check you spelling and I think your on your way to being banned again!

[marinerbc]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

since when was the epa right about anything? I use the actual people who make the cars and trucks the auto company!

An auto company like Toyota would never falsify their mileage numbers, right? Ever?

Since you're arguably the best patriot on this site, fighting communism, socialism, and for truth, justice and the American way, how do you feel that exporting Just and Truthful American Greenbacks and GDP to Aichi, Japan helps the United States of America exactly?

[Uzzy]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

the metric system is the first line of attack by socialist and communists alike. Thank god in the 1980's congress under the 2nd greatest president Ronald Regan, Bush is the 1st greatest president) repealed the metric system from ever taking place. I would sonner die then switch to the metric system and as i told my teachers and professors, this is america and we use the english system! We are the worlds greatest country on the face of the planet. and the other countries need to follow our lead or elsw those countries may face the full wrath of America!

[marinerbc]

Originally Posted by Uzzy

Pretty much set the credibility bar rather low, didn't he?

[Uzzy]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

the metric system is the first line of attack by socialist and communists alike. Thank god in the 1980's congress under the 2nd greatest president Ronald Regan, Bush is the 1st greatest president) repealed the metric system from ever taking place. I would sonner die then switch to the metric system and as i told my teachers and professors, this is america and we use the english system! We are the worlds greatest country on the face of the planet. and the other countries need to follow our lead or elsw those countries may face the full wrath of America!

Caleb02, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

[Caleb02]

Originally Posted by Uzzy

Caleb02, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

so you believe that america is going to switch to the devils metric system? Besides a 2L of Pepsi and your engine size in Liters what else do you buy in liters? The answer is nothing... not milk, not mulch, no toothpaste, no condoms! America has been well served by the English system, we have used it for over 200 plus years why change now.... So i take it you are part of the vast left wing media elite...

[Uzzy]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

so you believe that america is going to switch to the devils metric system? Besides a 2L of Pepsi and your engine size in Liters what else do you buy in liters? The answer is nothing... not milk, not mulch, no toothpaste, no condoms! America has been well served by the English system, we have used it for over 200 plus years why change now.... So i take it you are part of the vast left wing media elite...

No, I was quoting the movie Billy Madison, because everything you say on here is simply moronic.

[marinerbc]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

so you believe that america is going to switch to the devils metric system? Besides a 2L of Pepsi and your engine size in Liters what else do you buy in liters? The answer is nothing... not milk, not mulch, no toothpaste, no condoms! America has been well served by the English system, we have used it for over 200 plus years why change now.... So i take it you are part of the vast left wing media elite...

Question for you, Caleb.

Why would a Pepsi be be measured in Litres, engine displacement in litres, when they could easily say that it's a 67 ounce Pepsi, or your engine is 140 cubic inches?

Why are those the only exceptions?

Oh and I like buying condoms that are size 6,897.

[Caleb02]

Originally Posted by marinerbc

Question for you, Caleb.

Why would a Pepsi be be measured in Litres, engine displacement in litres, when they could easily say that it's a 67 ounce Pepsi, or your engine is 140 cubic inches?

Why are those the only exceptions?

Oh and I like buying condoms that are size 6,897.

good one on the condoms....
I love all things conservative American! I think america was founded by God to be the leader of the free world. Laterly america has fallen because of liberals invading our country and thus forcing us to make garbage cars. that is why foreign cars from japan are the standard americans judge by.

[96_impala_ss]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

canada must use those funny metrics for their math, in america we use real math numb3rs.

LMFAO! just give up and admit the toyota gets worse milage than a comparable Big 3 SUV/Truck

Originally Posted by Caleb02

since when was the epa right about anything? I use the actual people who make the cars and trucks the auto company!

thats not making much of a statement. theyre just using the SAME EPA NUMBERS
to know how much a car really gets the only real way to know is to talk to the drivers themselves.

[AMERICA 123]

Originally Posted by Caleb02

my mpg for the f150 is for the non fuel efficent model which is for one model trim level only. MY findings are driectly from the manufactors own website with a link tha ti provided. Were is your link?

The official EPA 2009 Fuel Economy Guide.

Here, since you get lost so easily, is the exact link you need.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/FEG2009.pdf

Part of your massive error here is you failed to look up the [1] [2] notes that Toyota uses with that number. Of course they put the best number they can up front and large - its your job to understand correctly what they are saying - and to read all of indicated material.

Yes, Toyota doesn't follow normal convention concerning those indicated notations and put them on the same screen or anything else similiar - no surprise afterall this is Toyota so there is always going to an attempt to spin the presentation.

Toyota
http://www.toyota.com/tundra/index.html
19 MPG HIGHWAY EST. [1] [2]
15 MPG CITY EST. [1] [2]

On the page you linked for Toyota, you can click on the notations and get a definition.

Here is [1]:

2008 EPA-estimated mileage. For Model Year 2008, the EPA has revised the way the estimated fuel economy ratings is are determined. Actual mileage will vary. To learn more, visit the Department of Energy’s and EPA’s fuel economy Web site.

And here is [2]:

Tundra 2WD V6 models.

and with the crown vic according to your own numbers the Crown Vic still is bigger then the 300c.... so who is the one that is accurate here man..... I take it you must work for the liberal media elite. Also the 300c does even look to be as large as the Crown Vic. Plus alot of people like the looks of the crown vic or ford would not be selling them hand over fist to people....

No, I don't work for the liberal media elite - unless you think membership in the NRA qualifies. You wildly overstated the difference - is that why we're changing subjects here ?????

[vibecar]

GM + Chrysler may look like this (+ Saturn, Saab, Hummer):



I'm in retail, and i think that the possible GM-Chrysler merger will look like the merger of Sears and Kmart: two declining companies together but still having too many outdated stores, losing market share and being passed by strong retailers like Wal-Mart, Target and Lowe's.

[Caleb02]

Originally Posted by AMERICA 123

The official EPA 2009 Fuel Economy Guide.

Here, since you get lost so easily, is the exact link you need.

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/FEG2009.pdf

Part of your massive error here is you failed to look up the [1] [2] notes that Toyota uses with that number. Of course they put the best number they can up front and large - its your job to understand correctly what they are saying - and to read all of indicated material.

Yes, Toyota doesn't follow normal convention concerning those indicated notations and put them on the same screen or anything else similiar - no surprise afterall this is Toyota so there is always going to an attempt to spin the presentation.



On the page you linked for Toyota, you can click on the notations and get a definition.

Here is [1]:

And here is [2]:


No, I don't work for the liberal media elite - unless you think membership in the NRA qualifies. You wildly overstated the difference - is that why we're changing subjects here ?????

nra is the most liberal of all the media groups out their, even more so then the house speaker Queen Nancy Pelosi



Toyota mpg and the ford mpg i listed are the most fuel efficient model of their line for the tundra and the f150