GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
 
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics eBay Marketplace Media Gallery Mark Forums Read

Please Visit our Site Sponsors

GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2008, 03:21 AM   #136 (permalink)
Walking
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Niederbipp, Switzerland
Drives: 2007 Cadillac Escalade 1966 ERA Cobra 427 S/C
Posts: 8
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

make no sense:

Two blinde don't see more as one !

Greetings from Switzerland

Walter
Walter Kreuchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 10-17-2008, 08:08 AM   #137 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
Uzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2004 Chevy Silverado Z71; 1987 Plymouth Reliant
Posts: 8,053
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter Kreuchi View Post
makes no sense:

Two blind don't see more as one!

Greetings from Switzerland

Walter
There is a similar saying here..."the blind leading the blind."
__________________
Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find him, maybe you can hire Uzzy.
'Ich bin ein Detroiter'
Uzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 03:07 PM   #138 (permalink)
6.0 Liter L76 V8
 
CJ Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,007
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

So will the 300 become an Impala and a V10 go in the Vette and will I still get my e-flex Wrangler and will my Durango become worthless and my Challenger never be made and....**** damn rumors always stress me out.
__________________
He that displays too often his wife and his wallet is in danger of having both of them borrowed.
Benjamin Franklin

MOOLA!

CJ Thunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2008, 03:09 PM   #139 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
Uzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2004 Chevy Silverado Z71; 1987 Plymouth Reliant
Posts: 8,053
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ Thunder View Post
So will the 300 become an Impala and a V10 go in the Vette and will I still get my e-flex Wrangler and will my Durango become worthless and my Challenger never be made and....**** damn rumors always stress me out.
They better not put that V10 lump in 'Vette.
__________________
Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find him, maybe you can hire Uzzy.
'Ich bin ein Detroiter'
Uzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 12:30 AM   #140 (permalink)
Walking
 
Cadillac 502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Columbia falls,MT
Drives: 2005 Pontiac Grand Prix, 3.8l V6(200Hp), Maroon
Posts: 10
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

If both the companies join together and trim the excess and repeated companies like buick and chrysler, jeep and hummer, dodge and chevy, dodge and GMC, then they should be fine. The joining of these companies needs to be balanced as not to cannibalize their sales or "trimming the fat", but overall I think they would do well. The companies merging would mean less of a market or downsizing of the market which is what needs to happen right now according to supply and demand(lot of supply, not enough demand to stabilize enough companies like Chrysler, Ford, GM, Toyota, Honda etc.) Even if it's just merging two of the companies that helps the market stabilize. I for one, am a total nut for BOTH companies(Ford & Toyota suck) I love the Dodge pickups and cars and I love the Chevy vehicles but seeing them together will make me happy!(Unless they get rid of the new Challenger, THEN I'll be P.O.'d (I want to buy one when I finish college
__________________
Cadillac 502
Cadillac 502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 12:34 AM   #141 (permalink)
Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: France
Drives: 2006 Yamaha YBR 125 1990 Citroën Ax
Posts: 14,550
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cadillac 502 View Post
If both the companies join together and trim the excess...
The question is if GM hasn't been able to do that so far, how are they going to do it when there's even more excess to trim?
__________________
It's been swell, but the swelling's gone down.
paul8488 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 12:59 AM   #142 (permalink)
Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: France
Drives: 2006 Yamaha YBR 125 1990 Citroën Ax
Posts: 14,550
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

For those that think that Chrysler's minivans are a big incentive for this deal:


http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/cbc/08101...chrysler_shift



So if GM DOES decide to mash Chrysler's brands into the mix, they get:

Minivans, with falling sales.
Jeep, with a mix of thirsty SUVs and generally unloved soft-roaders.
Challenger, a low-volume RWD pony car.

Really tempting.

The TJ is the only Jeep worth keeping. It's the legend. The new Ram is excellent, but GM knows how to build a truck. The LX cars need a refresh, and GM has its own RWD platform Zeta. The Challenger competes directly with the Camaro. I don't see a single thing product-wise that GM needs from Chrysler.
__________________
It's been swell, but the swelling's gone down.

Last edited by paul8488 : 10-18-2008 at 01:06 AM.
paul8488 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 02:26 AM   #143 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
Uzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2004 Chevy Silverado Z71; 1987 Plymouth Reliant
Posts: 8,053
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul8488 View Post
For those that think that Chrysler's minivans are a big incentive for this deal:


http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/cbc/08101...chrysler_shift



So if GM DOES decide to mash Chrysler's brands into the mix, they get:

Minivans, with falling sales.
Jeep, with a mix of thirsty SUVs and generally unloved soft-roaders.
Challenger, a low-volume RWD pony car.

Really tempting.

The TJ is the only Jeep worth keeping. It's the legend. The new Ram is excellent, but GM knows how to build a truck. The LX cars need a refresh, and GM has its own RWD platform Zeta. The Challenger competes directly with the Camaro. I don't see a single thing product-wise that GM needs from Chrysler.
The Windsor Star reported the minivans could go to Renault and therefore Nissan, not GM.
__________________
Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find him, maybe you can hire Uzzy.
'Ich bin ein Detroiter'
Uzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 03:25 AM   #144 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
fp115's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,039
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uzzy View Post
The Windsor Star reported the minivans could go to Renault and therefore Nissan, not GM.
That report is false. Nissan has issued a press release claiming that they are not interested.
fp115 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 12:59 PM   #145 (permalink)
4.6 Liter Northstar V8
 
96_impala_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Drives: 96 Chevy Cavalier 96 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Posts: 1,677
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb02 View Post
Americans have a memory of bad quality and bad mpg.
So thats why the Tundra, Titan, Sequoya, Land Cruiser, and Armada get worse mileage than the comparable Silverado/Sierra, F150, Suburban/Yukon XL/Escalade, Expedition/Navigator?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb02 View Post
So how do you counter people like her. ... so how do you over come road blocks of people who have a bad image of detroit?
Shes sheeple. Thats all i can say. Shes one of those people that would think a recall from Toyota, Honda or Nissan is for the customer's safety because "Toyota/Honda/Nissan cares" but a recall from FoMoCo, GM, Chrysler LLC is because they cant build cars for SxxT and should cease to exist.
96_impala_ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 04:26 PM   #146 (permalink)
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
 
vibecar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Drives: 04' Pontiac Vibe
Posts: 115
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger, a disaster, too much brands, too much models, too many cars, trucks, cross-overs, engines, dealers, it would mean another huge restructuring of staff, factories, design, marketing, offices, layoffs, unions... i just don't see how can a GM-Chrysler emerge from that merger as a stronger, leaner car company.
vibecar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 04:35 PM   #147 (permalink)
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
 
American_Muscle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Delaware
Drives: '97 Silverado
Posts: 1,223
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Here's how I see it.

IMO...Jeep should stay Jeep, Hummer could jump ship with them becoming a model rather then own company (the jeep H2, jeep h3t, etc..this fill voids in the jeep area)

Buick and Chrysler become the middle luxury, just under cadillac. The 300c would get renamed the Buick Chrysler 300c..since thats all thats worth keeping. MAYBE a mini van..but most of that would go to saturn.

Dodges and Pontiac become the same as well, becomming the true performance and car division with the challanger, charger, G8, g6, g5, a new sub compact, nitro, and perhaps a redone magnum. Names would remain the same, dodge's are dodge and pontiacs are pontiacs.

GMC's do NOT become Rams, that wouldnt make sence, but the Rams become GMC's...this will finally make a distinct difference in GM's Pickup market, the silverado's and sierras will now be two completely different trucks.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmlifer View Post
I never realized that being a community organizer would not only prepare you to be the savior of the world but also make you an instant expert on running the largest automotive company in the world.
American_Muscle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 05:12 PM   #148 (permalink)
Banned
 
Caleb02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,148
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by 96_impala_ss View Post
So thats why the Tundra, Titan, Sequoya, Land Cruiser, and Armada get worse mileage than the comparable Silverado/Sierra, F150, Suburban/Yukon XL/Escalade, Expedition/Navigator?



Shes sheeple. Thats all i can say. Shes one of those people that would think a recall from Toyota, Honda or Nissan is for the customer's safety because "Toyota/Honda/Nissan cares" but a recall from FoMoCo, GM, Chrysler LLC is because they cant build cars for SxxT and should cease to exist.
the tundra, titan sequoya, land cruiser and armada are better designed and made and also do get better gas millage. What you are doing in compairing the largest engine choise from toyota to the lowest enginge choice from ford. When you look at the same engines from both manufactors then toyota wins hands down on mpg not ford otherwise ford would not be backpeddling on a diesel for the new f series.

it is a known fact that toyota cares more about its customers then ford which was convicted for murder! Ford had covered up the Pinto issues, the Ford Explorer Tire Issues, and the Crown Vic gas tank issues on the Police cars.... So Ford has a history of believing and stating in memos that it is cheaper to pay families of dead people then to fix an issue. Toyota would rather fix any issue no matter how small before it kills anyone.

Last edited by Caleb02 : 10-18-2008 at 05:17 PM.
Caleb02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 06:33 PM   #149 (permalink)
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
Uzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Windsor Ontario, Canada
Drives: 2004 Chevy Silverado Z71; 1987 Plymouth Reliant
Posts: 8,053
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb02 View Post
the tundra, titan sequoya, land cruiser and armada are better designed and made and also do get better gas millage. What you are doing in compairing the largest engine choise from toyota to the lowest enginge choice from ford. When you look at the same engines from both manufactors then toyota wins hands down on mpg not ford otherwise ford would not be backpeddling on a diesel for the new f series.
Lets see some numbers and sources. I don't believe you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb02 View Post
it is a known fact that toyota cares more about its customers then ford
It is a well known fact, that when people start a sentence with the words "it is a well known fact" that they are actually making up the rest of the sentence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb02 View Post
which was convicted for murder! Ford had covered up...the Crown Vic gas tank issues on the Police cars.... So Ford has a history of believing and stating in memos that it is cheaper to pay families of dead people then to fix an issue.
The same police force that sued Ford for the dead cop, and won, later put in an order for a couple hundred more Crown Victorias...I guess they didn't care that much either. Ford canceled the orders.
__________________
Speramus Meliora; Resurget Cineribus
Aut viam inveniam aut faciam
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find him, maybe you can hire Uzzy.
'Ich bin ein Detroiter'
Uzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2008, 11:16 PM   #150 (permalink)
Banned
 
Caleb02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,148
Re: GM + Chrysler: What it may look like post-merger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uzzy View Post
Lets see some numbers and sources. I don't believe you.

It is a well known fact, that when people start a sentence with the words "it is a well known fact" that they are actually making up the rest of the sentence.

The same police force that sued Ford for the dead cop, and won, later put in an order for a couple hundred more Crown Victorias...I guess they didn't care that much either. Ford canceled the orders.
Toyota
http://www.toyota.com/tundra/index.html
19 MPG HIGHWAY EST. [1] [2]
15 MPG CITY EST. [1] [2]

http://www.fordvehicles.com/trucks/f150/features/specs/
4x4 14 City/18 HWY
So as you can see in 4x4 mode toyota tundra does get better mpg right from their own websites tooo.....


it is a well known fact that the crown vic is the biggest cop car on the market and the chevy impala and dodge charger are way smaller cars. And lets face it ford has a 90% market share for cop cars. The crown vic has the space and reliability that cops are looking for since no other auto companies in the planet makes a cop car as big.
Caleb02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > Automotive Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.