GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2006, 04:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York
Drives: 2008 Saab 9-5 Sedan
Posts: 4,069
Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Source: May 2006 Issue, Page 46

Ratings:

18: Volvo S60 2.5T (Recommended)
17: Dodge Charger R/T V8
16: Saab 9-3 2.0T
15: Jaguar X-Type 3.0
14: Infiniti G35 (Recommended)
13: Mercedes-Benz C230
12: Nissan Maxima (Recommended)
11: Cadillac CTS 2.8 (Recommended)
10: Subaru Legacy 2.5GT (Recommended)
09: Lincoln Zephry
08: Acura TSX
07: Ford Fusion SEL V6
06: Audi A4 2.0T (Recommended)
05: BMW 325i
04: Lexus IS250 (Recommended)
03: Honda Accord Hybrid V6 (Recommended)
02: Volkswagon Passat 3.6
01: Acura TL (Recommended)

Notes:

Cadillac CTS
Highs: Agility, ride, steering, transmission, regular fuel.
Lows: Slow-reacting stability control, seat-mounted seat belts, rocker window switches, pesky interior oversites.
Reliability: Worse than average.

Saab 9-3:
Highs: Crash-test results, braking, regular fuel.
Lows: Ride, road-noise, rear seat, reliability, complicated radio.
Reliability: Much worse than average.
Perian is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 04-09-2006, 04:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
News Contributor
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New York
Drives: 2008 Saab 9-5 Sedan
Posts: 4,069
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perian
Cadillac CTS
Highs: Agility, ride, steering, transmission, regular fuel.
Lows: Slow-reacting stability control, seat-mounted seat belts, rocker window switches, pesky interior oversites.
Reliability: Worse than average.

Saab 9-3:
Highs: Crash-test results, braking, regular fuel.
Lows: Ride, road-noise, rear seat, reliability, complicated radio.
Reliability: Much worse than average.
My Dad has a 06 CTS 2.8 with 3K: Not one problem so far.
I drive an 05 9-3 with 12K: Not one problem so far.

They are both great vehicles.
Perian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
JonathanRohr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Drives: 2000 Pontiac Firebird
Posts: 431
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Quote:
Originally Posted by Perian
My Dad has a 06 CTS 2.8 with 3K: Not one problem so far.
I drive an 05 9-3 with 12K: Not one problem so far.

They are both great vehicles.
Im not trying to back consumer reports here.. but 3k and 12k are nothing.

Talk to me when you hit 100k...
__________________
TMC v GM: (8-3)
Subcompact: Toyota (Yaris)
Compact: Toyota (Corolla)
Midsize: GM (Aura)
Hybrid/Alt Fuel: Toyota (Prius)
X-Over: GM (Outlook/Acadia/Enclave)
Minivan: Toyota (Sienna)
Compact SUV: Toyota (Rav4)
Midsize SUV: Toyota (Highlander)
Fullsize SUV: GM (Tahoe)
Midsize Truck: Toyota (Tacoma)
1/2 Ton Truck: Tie (but it counts as a loss, it should be no contest)
As of 2/7/07

Please note that 2 catagories were reclaimed as of this year. Will keep updating, hopefully adding more blue!
JonathanRohr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Quickening's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Drives: 2004 Saab 9-3 Aero
Posts: 5,149
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

I find it odd that the Aero wouldn't be on that list also if the 2.0t could make it. It adds more horsepower with a turbocharged V6 and a more advanced stability control system (safety).

But since I own an 04 Aero, I'm biased. Mine has 52k miles on it, top notch shape. Complicated radio? Its pretty straight forward and then as some extra things on it that make it nice I think. But I will agree on the road noise, I do notice my tires/road noise much more. If they complain about rear seat room, makes me wonder if they did on the 3 series.
__________________


2004 Saab 9-3 Aero
Quickening is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Butz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Old Miltia
Posts: 5,984
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

How did they conclude that the CTS is below average?
__________________
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
Down with the Anti-Smokers Nazis!
Member of The: I will never buy an imported car in my life Club.
Member of The: I will never buy a locally built foreign car in my life Club.
Member of The: I only buy American cars that are built in America Club.
Quote:
If the automobile had followed the same development as the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year killing everyone inside.
—Robert Cringely
Butz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
Quickening's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Drives: 2004 Saab 9-3 Aero
Posts: 5,149
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Quote:
Originally Posted by Butz
How did they conclude that the CTS is below average?
Because under Lows: Seat mounted seat belts

That truly just makes the car a pos..
What is wrong with seat mounted seat belts?
__________________


2004 Saab 9-3 Aero
Quickening is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:31 PM   #7 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
MNdudeswitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Drives: 2002 Honda Accord EX-V6
Posts: 1,194
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

^ They are ugly looking!
MNdudeswitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:34 PM   #8 (permalink)
3.8 Liter V6
 
Hotspur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 485
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

How is it that the Honda V6 Hybrid gets a "Recommended" status while virtually all other new cars are labeled "to new to determine relabilty"? I've been a subscriber to CR for at least 15 years and never agreed with its car reviews.

Ultimately its "Buyer Beware", even when what your buying is someonelse's (bogus) opinions.

And after logging many miles in a friends Acura TL it is clear that car should be listed under "Appliances - Dull"

Last edited by Hotspur : 04-09-2006 at 04:38 PM.
Hotspur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
3.9 Liter V6
 
cdp326's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NC
Drives: '97 Maxima SE
Posts: 997
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Wait--why is the Accord Hybrid V6 in there? That isn't a sport sedan. What, they couldn't find an Accord EX V6 6-speed? I hope they didn't list "best in test fuel economy" as a high....

I think this list is crazy. You have full size family sedans mixed with compact luxury sport sedans...
cdp326 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
3.5 Liter V6
 
tosil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario Canada
Drives: 2001 Saturn SC2 (yellow)
Posts: 271
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

How is it that they recommend the CTS, but it has worse then average reliability???? I have not heard of the CTS having reliability issues...
__________________
tosil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
 
sigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the Galactica CIC
Drives: 2005 Chevy Malibu
Posts: 2,559
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Yet another example of CR not knowing what the hell they are talking about.

That bad rating for the 9-3 2.0t comes from the disaster that was MY03. I haven't heard about significant problems in that car for any other model year.
__________________
"The best committee is the committee of one"
-Bob Lutz


sigma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:50 PM   #12 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 533
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

So what is there about rocker window switches that the hot shots at CR can't figure out? Had 'em on my CTS. Got 'em on my STS. One touch each way. And that makes the car a POS??
goatgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:53 PM   #13 (permalink)
Banned
 
ben72227's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arkansas
Drives: 1980 DIESEL Cadillac Eldorado
Posts: 502
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quickening
Because under Lows: Seat mounted seat belts

That truly just makes the car a pos..
What is wrong with seat mounted seat belts?
No, its below average because it's reliability is nothing noteworthy, and because its center console LOOKS LIKE CRAP, or, as they said it, pesky interior oversites.

Besides, seat mounted seat belts SUCK for tall people, and Cadillac should have known better. And they just look tacky - to have this luxo-sports car with premium leather seats, then there's this big plastic box on top with the seatbelt in it.

But I garuntee(sp?) the reason the CTS did so bad was (A) they tested the 2.8 model and (B) it has the worst Center console of all time:


Yucky Black Plastic just doesn't cut it in a $30,000+ car. Hell, that CD player looks like the old 5.25 floppy disk slots in the old computers:



The TL is how you make a REAL interior. It may not be perfect, but there aren't any huge gaps like in the CTS:
ben72227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:53 PM   #14 (permalink)
Firebird Concept (the turbine one)
 
asim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 11,271
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

Wow, no one called them biased yet, just that they don't know what they are talking about.
__________________
I'll make a new sig. Later.
asim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 04:54 PM   #15 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
MNdudeswitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Drives: 2002 Honda Accord EX-V6
Posts: 1,194
Re: Consumer Reports Rates Sports Sedans

^^ wow the CTS's center consule looks like crap; I thought GM was moving away from the rubbermaid?
MNdudeswitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.