![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,256
|
Can a Full Size Zeta V8 CUV be far behind?
Can a Full Size Zeta V8 CUV be far behind?
LeftlaneNews.com confirms that the GMC Zeta Truck Concept will appear in a few weeks at Chicago. If GM creates a Zeta Truck to sell under the too heavy for CAFE Body on Frame Full Size Trucks, then like night follows day this will likely spawn a Zeta Full Size V8/V6 CUV to sell under the CAFE unfriendly Full Size SUV's. With V8 power and higher payload and towing capability than the Lambda's (and Hybrid ready unlike Lambda) the question then is; which Division/s should get them? Should they be GMC and Chevy, or put the Park Avenue Zeta Interior in them for luxury Cadillac or Buick versions? See my artists chop below of GMC Zeta Truck, Zeta Sportwagon (G8) for size comparison, and likely Zeta V8/V6 CUV. http://www.leftlanenews.com/car-base...t-pontiac.html Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by MonaroSS : 01-29-2008 at 04:23 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Philadelphia Area
Drives: 08 CTS DI RWD Nav, 08 Sienna Limited AWD Nav
Posts: 5,639
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
I think I'd expect to see GM take a different approach - using the FWD-based Lambda platform for non-BOF trucks (like the Acadia SUT - similar in concept to the Ridgeline).
Zeta-based trucks would save fuel over BOF trucks, but Lutz said that all things being equal, FWD saves about 1 mpg versus RWD. Plus the majority of the engineering is complete on the Lambda trucks, just by having the CUVs on the road. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Mar 2007
Drives: 1995 Pontiac Trans Am
1995 Buick LeSabre
Posts: 1,054
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
I like the idea of the luxury Cadillac and Buick versions, but Chevy and GMC should ride the dinosaur until the meteor hits.
__________________
1995 Pontiac Trans Am LT1 5.7L (retired for winter) 1995 Buick LeSabre 3800 Gone: 2001 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS 3400 Gone: 1997 Chevrolet S-10 4x4 4.3L |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
3.5 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 293
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
Quote:
Towing. I know a lot of people think the Fridgeline does ok at this, but, in reality, Honda essentially HAS to make all Fridgelines be AWD. There's a lot of RWD Tahoes and Yukons out there that dispense with the extra weight, cost, and complication of a transfer case. They can tow just fine, and, in some cases, better than a 4WD (less parasitic weight). Make the Tahoe/Yukon replacement be a RWD machine with a beefy rear suspension and they should do ok at towing for what the AVERAGE person needs. E.g. as our Aussie friends like to point out, towing a modest boat or trailer to the campgrounds. The reason that Dodge's Rampage concept could never make it to production was that it was a Front-driver with a Hemi. Load the bed up with anything, and you take the weight off the front wheels. Once that happens, you've lost your traction and you're screwed. With a RWD setup (optional AWD), you have less problem with this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC Metro Area
Drives: 58 Belvedere;
61 LeSabre; 96 Fleetwood; 07 SRX
Posts: 8,495
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
Quote:
/Thread.
__________________
Used to own: 1959 Cadillac Series 62, 1960 AMC Rambler Six, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu, 2000 Saturn LS2, 2005 Chrysler 300C, 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,256
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,256
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
3.9 Liter V6
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles Area
Drives: '08 Mazda CX-9 Sport
'07 Mazda3 Grand Touring
Posts: 855
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
GMC could do well with a crewman. As long as it doesn't look too much like the G8 sport truck, though.
I'd say give GMC a crewman-type product to run down the line with the Camaro. Also, this is where the SRX replacement can come from. Make it a tall sportswagon with impressive dynamics and respectable cargo capcacity. That would allow the BRX to slot in as entry level, yet retain a car-like product underneath the Escalade range. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Drives: '01 Grand Prix GT
'96 Roadmaster Wagon
Posts: 1,407
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
The Lamda's are really appealing to me but I want something with a minimum of 5000lb towing capacity. I'd also be leary of towing something that heavy with FWD and I'm not sure I need or want the upfront and ongoing costs associated with AWD. My RWD wagon works well for me but when I replace it someday I want something with a friendlier 3rd row and all the modern safety features. I don't know that I want FWD for a tow vehicle. With RWD you gain traction as you put the tounge weight on the hitch. With FWD you loose traction.
I never thought about it before but I'd prefer a Zeta Full size SUV over a Lambda FWD SUV as long as it had adequate towing capacity. Isn't a Jeep Grand Cherokee a unibody and not BOF? It seems to have adequate towing capacity but it certainly doesn't seem to offer a fuel economy benefit. Maybe I'm wrong on that.
__________________
![]() 1996 Buick Roadmaster Wagon 2001 Pontiac Grand Prix |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC Metro Area
Drives: 58 Belvedere;
61 LeSabre; 96 Fleetwood; 07 SRX
Posts: 8,495
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
Quote:
Having both a fullsize RWD unibody SUV and a fullsize FWD unibody SUV is absurd.
__________________
Used to own: 1959 Cadillac Series 62, 1960 AMC Rambler Six, 1998 Chevrolet Malibu, 2000 Saturn LS2, 2005 Chrysler 300C, 2006 Pontiac G6 GTP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,256
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
Quote:
I think there would be many on here who would not agree with that. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 24,405
|
Re: Can a Full Size CUV be far behind?
ACtually.... This this into the Escalade!!! And maybe they have something...
__________________
![]() 2000 Saab 9-5 Aero 1995 Mercedes C280 1994 Jaguar XJ6 ...when all hope is gone, you know sad songs say so much...My Vision of Cadillac My Vision of Cadillac (REDUX) ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Drives: 2007 Pontiac Grand Prix
1997 Saab 900 2.0 Turbo
Posts: 1,431
|
Re: Can a Full Size Zeta V8 CUV be far behind?
It would be nice to keep the SRX around, so maybe a Zeta will keep it alive another generation.
__________________
Current: 2007 Pontiac Grand Prix 1997 Saab 900 2.0 Turbo(148,500 Sobbing Saab on blocks) 1987 Chevrolet Silverado 10 (retired 11/12/2007; 219,986 mi.) Dead: 1983 Datsun 280 ZX by Nissan (146,857 mi.) 1986 Lincoln Mercury Lynx (64K mi.) 1979 Chrysler Cordoba w/ Corinthian Leather seats (130K mi.) 1976 Dodge Charger (130K mi.) |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|