![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#48 (permalink) | |
|
GMI Staff Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 13,135
|
Re: CAFE: GM Spokesman Sets "Very Conservative Expectations" On Initial Volt Producti
Quote:
The Volt will start out small, and by the time it gets into big volume production, who knows where Hydrogen will be... Meanwhile, GM will need a hyper-fuel efficient car based on more traditional technology. Or just let the Japanese and Europeans corner that market.
__________________
Last edited by Ming : 08-01-2008 at 01:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) | |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,878
|
Re: CAFE: GM Spokesman Sets "Very Conservative Expectations" On Initial Volt Producti
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Jun 2005
Drives: GMPP ZZ383
Posts: 454
|
Re: CAFE: GM Spokesman Sets "Very Conservative Expectations" On Initial Volt Producti
The government should know better. We get beat up all the time in defense acquisitions because we put a requirement out for bidding that really can only be answered by one company. The various agencies in gov't acquisitions can make us change our requirement so that it promotes competition and gives other companies a chance to bid. Here I see the same thing....put out a requirement that obviously can only be met by a car company that specializes in small cars will kill our domestics. Companies that make full size trucks and vans are important for supporting many industries within the United States. We need to rethink this.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|