GM Forum / GM News GM Forum / GM News
Go Back   GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News
Register Home Forum Active Topics Media Gallery Mark Forums Read


       
GM Inside News & GM Forum is the premier GM Forum and GM News Source on the internet. We discuss all GM models on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2008, 03:02 PM   #31 (permalink)
2.4 Liter ECOTEC
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Auto Land
Drives: 2008 Colorado Crew Cab Z71 RWD
Posts: 94
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

It's easy to bash GM as it's been a big target for a long time. It's royally messed up in recent times too.

However, if 8 brands (4 major ones at most as Saab, GMC, Hummer, and Buick are less than full line) are so bad, why are GM's non-US competitors falling over themselves in the last 25 years to add brands and build new channels for sales? Scion has been a huge failure for Toyota on an investment to sales ratio. It was much more than just some re-badged models and new signs - ask the 200 or so US dealers that didn't buy-in to Scion and who let on at the NADA meetings in March that not buying in has increased their bottom line compared to fellow dealers who did buy-in by up to 20%.

How about Honda who is just now putting the finishing touches on a third division to market in emerging markets and to market smaller cars in existing markets. What do they see about more being better that this author missed?

And what about Nissan who has not had great success with Infiniti other than the occasional hit like the G series? Is GM the only manufacturer that hasn't quite got the brand messages clearly defined and separated in the market?

Just look at VW with the Phaeton to see what happens when one big brand holds all of your apples. Too much brand spread is even worse than too many brands.
__________________
Proud to own:
2008 Colorado CrewCab Z71 2WD
2008 Suzuki SX-4 Crossover AWD Touring
2005 Malibu Maxx LT2
2005 Malibu Sedan LT2
2003 Porsche Boxster S (sunny days and track events)
Bigbee60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-15-2008, 03:03 PM   #32 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
vcs2600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,911
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by zete View Post
Pontiacs will be rebadged Holdens, which means Holden has an avenue in North America for their cars. Saturn are rebadged Opels, again, Opel gets an avenue in North America. Buick ends up being a total niche luxury player, focusing on comfort and unpretentious luxury and the Chinese market while Cadillac can go after everyone globally along with Chevrolet.

Killing Pontiac will hurt Holden. Killing Saturn hurts Opel. Killing Buick hurts Buick. And Buick is massive in China.
Pontiac/Holden is 1 low-volume car, maybe 2 at most. Which could also easily be sold at Chevrolet. Poor rationale for a brand.

It also hasn't been shown that Americans will buy the same Buicks as China. Quite possibly this strategy will price Buick out of its traditional market.

Saturn = Opel is the only one that makes some sense as a VW-ish brand. But GM-Europe should be responsible for management to prevent unneeded badgejobbers like the Outlook appearing. Oh, VW-North America isn't profitable either.

BGP seems to me that it's ripe for a shut down. Its the marketing overhead for 3 brands even though they barely have the sales volume of one brand (about 1/2 of Chevrolet's sales in total). The three brands have almost zero synergies with each other (unlike Mercury/Lincoln or Scion/Toyota). It looks like a bunch of random cars thrown together on a lot, because that's what it is.

Niche is good, niche is important. But Buick/Pontiac/Saturn are historical volume brands, all with tons of baggage, and there's some serious problems with repositioning them as niche. It might be much cheaper to launch a new brand (eg Hummer) rather than repositioning the old ones.
vcs2600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:04 PM   #33 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Drives: '06 Saturn Vue
Posts: 572
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by zete View Post
The number of brands isn't the issue, instead it's the fact each was a full line brand.

What we're seeing now is a niche strategy for specific brands -- Buick, Pontiac, Saturn -- while Chevrolet becomes the full-line brand.

Pontiacs will be rebadged Holdens, which means Holden has an avenue in North America for their cars.

Saturn are rebadged Opels, again, Opel gets an avenue in North America.

Buick ends up being a total niche luxury player, focusing on comfort and unpretentious luxury and the Chinese market while Cadillac can go after everyone globally along with Chevrolet.

Killing Pontiac will hurt Holden. Killing Saturn hurts Opel. Killing Buick hurts Buick. And Buick is massive in China.

Totally on the money!

The problem isn't the number of brands its what you do with them. Keep the brands and focus the products they are selling.

GM needs to play to their individual strengths of each brand and be loyal to that concept.
For examples - no trucks for Pontiac just sporty vehicles and Opel products and Chevy clones for Saturn.

Having more brands can be just as much an advantage if used properly as it sometimes a disadvantage when they end up competeing against each other.
__________________

Last edited by Rocket 88 : 05-15-2008 at 03:08 PM.
Rocket 88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:06 PM   #34 (permalink)
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
 
espo19047's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia suburbs
Posts: 1,704
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by HotCarNut View Post

Honestly (and I realize this is going to piss a lot of people off) the best strategy would be to kill Chevrolet as it has the most independent dealers and nearly every model has a counterpart in another brand. Yes, I realize that it's the historical pillar of GM. Yes, I realize that the brand recognition is the highest. However, it also offers the best opportunity to close a large number of dealerships without having to kill 3 separate brands. Is it easier to kill one vs three? I don't know, .
I believe the last three words of hot car's quote.
__________________
Personalize your GM vehicle!
click here:

http://www.reedmantoll.com/ou/langho...s_parts_estore





Visit me: http://mysite.verizon.net/vze3ttrj/s...rgerchevrolet/
espo19047 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:15 PM   #35 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
jkennedy293's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Holly Springs, NC
Drives: '03 Cavalier
Posts: 1,294
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunden View Post
How is the Outlook a rebadged Chevy?

The 2009 Traverse
jkennedy293 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:21 PM   #36 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
CadiEldo67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New York State
Drives: 2002 Pontiac Grand Prix GT
Posts: 578
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Firstly, I love how all the Chevy guys jump on the boat to kill Pontiac, rivalry much?

Secondly, if GM does the 4 channels of brands the way it wishes to, it should work out.
  • Cadillac-could stand alone
  • Saab-if GM can't do it right, they should sell it
  • Hummer-probably doesn't have a future
  • Saturn-would be perfect if Pontiac had more of a sporty image
  • Pontiac-Could be so much more than it is right now, I think that Mazda does the performance image way better, and they sold a pickup and a minivan for sometime, lol
  • Buick-Buick is a global brand that does well in China, so there is no point in getting rid of it, they just need to make it work
  • GMC-These guys are #2 in the lineup as far as car sales, no point in getting rid of them
  • Chevy-stand alone brand, maybe Saturn could merge and could be the hybrid version of Chevy.
__________________
"In fact, the G8 GT isn't just quicker than the Charger R/T, but nearly as quick as the much more expensive 425-hp Charger SRT8. That beast's 6.1-liter Hemi sped it to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds and ripped up the quarter-mile in 13.6 seconds at 105 mph." - Edmunds.com
CadiEldo67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:29 PM   #37 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
LAMRONH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Caveville, Neanderthallande
Drives: 2007 black KIA Spectra EX. Have club, will travel.
Posts: 8,947
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by tgagneguam View Post
Oops, the author goofed a bit. I'll fix it for him:

G.M.'s biggest problem, however, is its unwieldy bureaucracy replete with incompetent managers who couldn't manage a brand if their careers depended on it and who have zero accountability for their past failings.

It's funny, GM will be shaving divisions-since the market allegedly cannot support them-yet we will see the market welcome new [read: better managed] foreign nameplates arrive on this shore in the coming years. Many of them will somehow find success despite having lesser budgets and zero brand image in this country. Fancy that!
Yes, yes, but their careers would suffer if we fired them!

I've seen the same goings-on in the military and civilian sectors, where incompetent higher-ups retain incompetent middle managers because holding them accountable for their incompetence might hamper their careers.

Stupid is as stupid does.


Attributing corporate success or failure belongs squarely on the shoulders of management. Not brands, not inanimate objects, but management or lack of same.
__________________

The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance.
Cicero (106 BC - 43 BC), 55 BC

Last edited by LAMRONH : 05-15-2008 at 03:36 PM.
LAMRONH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:30 PM   #38 (permalink)
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
 
prototype66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lansing MI.
Drives: 08 Malibu 05 Venture And restoring The Eldo!
Posts: 1,357
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by zete View Post
The number of brands isn't the issue, instead it's the fact each was a full line brand.

What we're seeing now is a niche strategy for specific brands -- Buick, Pontiac, Saturn -- while Chevrolet becomes the full-line brand.

With a niche strategy it will work fine. GM has the reach since they can spread the costs of a specific model around the world. The old GM would have each area have their own cars, but that's slowly disappearing. Pontiacs will be rebadged Holdens, which means Holden has an avenue in North America for their cars. Saturn are rebadged Opels, again, Opel gets an avenue in North America. Buick ends up being a total niche luxury player, focusing on comfort and unpretentious luxury and the Chinese market while Cadillac can go after everyone globally along with Chevrolet.

Killing Pontiac will hurt Holden. Killing Saturn hurts Opel. Killing Buick hurts Buick. And Buick is massive in China.

The article is written by someone who is so fixated on the North American part of GM they don't see the global picture. If the author had dug a bit deeper he'd have realized that what GM has been doing isn't simply consolidating dealerships but consolidating platforms. No longer are we going to see design and manufacturing replicate a small car for every market, instead they're looking at global platforms and global vehicles.

That's what Toyota does. And Toyota has started into niches with Scion.

Niches are the future. They won't sell like the main line, but they will keep people in the family when they no longer want the Chevrolet but want something more exotic. The niche brands will provide that, selling 200,000 - 300,000 vehicles a year tops. And as niche vehicles, GM can keep the supply limited and the profits high while Chevrolet can focus on those looking for a deal. Cadillac, once it regains its old luster, will simply charge a premium for being Cadillac.

And if you want to look at where the niche strategy currently works at GM look no further than Hummer. If that's not a niche vehicle, nothing is.
The most sensible statement made in this thread.
__________________

www.prototype66design.com
Get remembered!
chuckp@budkoutschevy.com
Michigan's #1 GM Certified used car dealer !www.budkoutschevy.com
prototype66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:35 PM   #39 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Drives: '98 H1 Open-top HMVEE! '67 Rolls Silver Shadow '
Posts: 1,040
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Never heard of this mag. We know that franchise laws and other buyout costs make it extremely expensive to close a brand- Olds $2 billion, they dont have the cash to do it. Only Saturn, with its few dealers, would be a likely buyout brand. IN theory, the article is correct, fewer models with more ad dollars behind the limited lineup. You have to run ads incessantly, everywhere to boost and reinforce awareness.
ghughes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:46 PM   #40 (permalink)
3.6 Liter V6
 
PAULSTS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,187
Cool Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Consolidation of business is the best plan as stated earlier: Pontiac, GMC, Saturn, and a new vehicle Performance Works (aftermarket Turbos, custom accessories) these dealerships should be responsible for Fleet Sales as well. This group would be positioned as the most active consolidation. Then Cadillac, Buick, Hummer, and SAAB, should handle GM’s Premium vehicle Programs. Finally Chevrolet cars and trucks, and some of the more popular GMC units should be under a single dealership.

Chevrolet should receive the maximum support from GM as this brand is absolutely required for corporate success. Over time the Pontiac, Saturn, GMC dealerships will either increase it's market share, or slowly be phased out, with Chevrolet gaining survivorship of the better products. The Premium Group, should have to adhere standards of: Look, Quality, and World Class Customer Service

__________________
All I want for Christmas....

Last edited by PAULSTS1 : 05-15-2008 at 03:49 PM.
PAULSTS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:48 PM   #41 (permalink)
GMI Staff Member
 
mgescuro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 24,405
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronald mcretard View Post
If GM killed Saab I would never forgive them. Besides, why kill it? I'm sure someone would buy it.
YES. Sell it to BMW!!!
It'll fill the gap in between Mini and BMW. Nor would it overlap the BMW lineup.
__________________


2000 Saab 9-5 Aero
1995 Mercedes C280
1994 Jaguar XJ6

...when all hope is gone, you know sad songs say so much...

My Vision of Cadillac
My Vision of Cadillac (REDUX)





mgescuro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:52 PM   #42 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 599
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by FStephenMasek View Post
Again - GM needs to advertise all of its brands together, not eliminate brands. The brands are an advantage. Le'ts use the Camry example from that article. Toyota only offers the Camry, Camry convertible, and Lexus ES, but GM offers the Malibu, G6, G6 convertible, Aura, 9-3, and 9-3 convertible, giving buyers a greater choice of interior and exterior styling.
I see what you're saying, but that's the problem. Toyota is selling those "few" models in the same numbers as GM is selling all those cars in the different brands. OK, GM does provide options in styling details, but the Malibu, G6, Aura, 9-3, & BLS are same/similar sizes and pretty much are the same vehicles just wearing different skirts. If GM only had 3 of the 5 models to design sedan, coupe, and convertible models for; they be able to offer better designs, option packages, etc. like Toyota is currently doing. AND it would be easier to market and update just the 3 models too. More funds for less mouths to feed.
jlt0x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 03:54 PM   #43 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
Astra RL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 526
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Killing brands fails. We all saw what happened with Oldsmobile those buyers that were supposed to go to other brands in GM, went elsewhere. So, if GM were to kill Buick, Saturn, GMC, Saab, and Hummer, where would these customers go to. Certainly some would go to chevy/Caddy but very few. Some people will not consider a Chevy, but will gladly purchase a Saturn Aura.
Astra RL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 04:05 PM   #44 (permalink)
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
 
t-rex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
Drives: 1997 BMW 328i S
Posts: 5,361
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

There's no reason why all of GM's brands, even the now-defunct Oldsmobile, couldn't survive, or even thrive, as full-line brands. GM damaged its brands, not the market.

Buick: soft, refined luxury. Priced between Chevy and Cadillac.
Cadillac: expensive luxury cars
Chevrolet: mainstream family cars and retro-themed models
GMC: upscale SUV's. Remake GMC along the lines of Land Rover/Range Rover.
Hummer: move to mainstream, competing with Jeep. Sell in Chevy showrooms.
Oldsmobile: midsize and up Opels, with new flagship models to be shared with Opel
Pontiac: the smaller Opels, and RWD products shared with Holden
Saab: Highly individualistic, aircraft-inspired cars, with no pretention of being "upscale"
Saturn: Inexpensive Daewoo-sourced subcompacts and compacts plus Opel's MPVs.

It'd take some fanagling to get the dealer channels right...

But if rationalisation is the answer, sell off Hummer and Saab (sadly, I don't think anybody would want either), kill GMC (I refuse to believe the vast majority of GMC buyers wouldn't migrate to Chevy), reshape Buick, and kill either Saturn or Pontiac, with the survivor of the two selling Opels and Holdens (I'm thinking Pontiac could do a better job of doing this).

Have three sales channels: mainstream Chevrolet, upscale/import Buick-Pontiac, and luxury Cadillac.

Last edited by t-rex : 05-15-2008 at 04:11 PM.
t-rex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 04:07 PM   #45 (permalink)
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
 
neshapop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, ON
Drives: Buick Allure CX 2005
Posts: 603
Re: Business Magazine Suggests GM Should Close 5 Of Its 8 U.S. Brands

Quote:
Originally Posted by Astra RL View Post
Killing brands fails. We all saw what happened with Oldsmobile those buyers that were supposed to go to other brands in GM, went elsewhere. So, if GM were to kill Buick, Saturn, GMC, Saab, and Hummer, where would these customers go to. Certainly some would go to chevy/Caddy but very few. Some people will not consider a Chevy, but will gladly purchase a Saturn Aura.
Your post is right on the money!

GM would save zillions of $$$ if they manage to get rid off all those marketing divisions and the army of paper pushers. Sometimes hurts to see how marketing guys will blow advertising budgets that may be nice contribution to Engineering or R&D. No money can fix your mess with the "cars" of yesterday. My father-in-law will not cross GM dealership door step even if they give away the cars for free. Baby boomers are lost for Big 3; they also teaching their kids what they have learned from their purchases and bad service experience.

Back on the topic, if GM kills Buick I will not buy Chevy, but I might consider Saturn Aura or Saab.

Last edited by neshapop : 05-16-2008 at 08:34 AM.
neshapop is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  GM Inside News Forum > Press Room > General Industry News



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
©2008 GMInsidenews.com.
GMInsideNews.com is not affiliated with GM, General Motors or any GM Divisions in any capacity.
GMInsideNews.com is an enthusiasts' forum dedicated entirely to news about GM vehicles.
  • AutoForums.com
  • Truck
  • European
  • Import
  • Domestic
  • Manufacturer

AutoForums.com is the premier network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
We operate more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share experiences and opinions as a community.

Visit AutoForums.com today.

For advertising information, please visit our AutoForums.com website and Contact Us, or send an email message to sales@autoforums.com.