![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,285
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Quote:
It's a little frightening to hear about the desires of Buick's current customers.
__________________
"It's only when the tide goes out that you learn who's been swimming naked." -Warren Buffet |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Feb 2005
Drives: 2009 Acura TSX
Posts: 2,632
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Just give Pontiac and Buick good products and they can really be effective.
__________________
Current: 2009 Acura TSX Gone but not forgotten: 2001 Saturn L300 1993 Saturn SL2 1986 Nissan Sentra |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
6.0 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Flint MI
Drives: 08 Enclave
Posts: 1,902
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
in addition to Enclave, Buick should have (Roadmaster) a large, substantial, powerful sedan. also a mid size sedan (Wildcat), coupe in two versions, one semi lux for the ladies (Regal), and one for the guys (GS). add in a Riv/Velite halo coupe with the hottest styling on the road, and we're good to go. then just leave us alone and let us move the metal.
from my perspective, we do not need lots of techno. OnStar with turn by turn is sufficient. great interiors and better colors would be welcome. with the right product and proper marketing Buick could once again approach 10% market share. we have the history of success and the dealer body to get the job done. just keep the pencils pushers out of the way and have corporate marketing stay out of retail.
__________________
Buickman Founder www.GeneralWatch.com It's not sunk, but's its definitely sinking. We don't need a Volt, we need a Revolt! Aristotle "A is A" Wagoner "BK is OK" |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
2.0 Liter Supercharged ECOTEC
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 150
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Only Chevrolet stands (mostly) alone. Cadillac is mixed in with Saab, Humvee, and Saturn.
__________________
Given enough rope, the capitalists will hang themselves. -Karl Marx |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
3.8 Liter V6
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Windsor, ON, Canada
Drives: 1995 Jimmy 2wd 4door (Envoy-fronted, Caddy-tail'd)
Posts: 437
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Quote:
The big change is that recreational truck buyers are shopping for the Lambdas whereas the people who NEED trucks are still NEEDING trucks.
__________________
Kris Creed | Sales Consultant | Gus Revenberg Pontiac-Buick-GMC-HUMMER | Windsor, ON | 800-291-1117 x126 | kris.creed@gusrevenberg.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra
'02 Regal GS
"05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,106
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Quote:
What do you think of the Wildcat concept based off of the CTS Coupe (to spread costs) equipped as you outline with a 3500 V6/5-speed auto standard on the Regal with the money saved over an OHC engine put into a great interior in Buick exclusive colors like burgundy and dark blue as well as several two-tone options with contrasting piping on some. The GS version could have the 5.3L V8 as standard with 6-speed automatic and the same great interior with at least one sport trim level. An option to the Wildcat name would be Gran Sport and there could also be sedan versions again shared with the CTS but with 3500 and 5.3 drivetrains (maybe the Wildcat could be the top model with a 6.2L V8) A new Electra 225 from the LWB Zeta (Holden Statesman) with standard 5.3L V8 and option 6.2L. Last edited by SierraGS : 07-23-2008 at 08:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter LS4 V8
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,285
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Quote:
The first and FOREMOST step GM must take is getting Buick OUT of showrooms with Pontiac and GMC. You simply cannot deliver the top of the line customer service experience if you need to cater to people buying Pontiac G5's and GMC Sierra work trucks as well. Half of the reason why Lexus was such a success was their unmatched dealer experience. Next, they NEED to up the technology level in Buicks. I don't care that Aunt Bertha and Uncle Ernie want their bench-seat OHV Century with a tape deck. Send them to Chevy to buy an Impala. They cannot be Buick's target customer if they want to be around in 10 years. Either match Lexus, or give up. Pair Buick up with Cadillac, and suddenly, we have a plan. Buick targets the Lexus buyer, and Cadillac targets the Mercedes buyer. I like your idea with the LS vs GS trim. I always thought it would be best for Buick to offer two trims of every vehicle... either a chromed-up luxury version, or a monochrome sport version. A very well done Invicta midsized sedan with optional AWD would eat the Lexus ES350's lunch, and would be a great volume seller to slot under the CTS. A large sedan is also needed. Granted, in today's world, that market is shrinking, but Cadillac needs to ditch the DTS. Build a large Buick sedan off the DT7 architecture, and bias it towards comfort and feature content. A Buick coupe to slot directly under the CTS Coupe would work, but ONLY if Buick is out of Pontiac showrooms. Base it on Epsilon II. Enclave is perfect, however, it does need a 2-row Theta-based Rendezvous to slot under it, and provide a crossover to slot under the SRX as well.
__________________
"It's only when the tide goes out that you learn who's been swimming naked." -Warren Buffet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
3.8 Liter Supercharged V6
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St Louis MO
Drives: 2006 Escalade, 98 STS
Posts: 623
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Buick + Cadillac = Redundant. People will drive a Lucerne, wonder why they'd pay for a more profitable DTS, and take the Buick home. Just kill Buick and give the Enclave to Cadillac or something.
__________________
www.CADILLACOWNERS.com - 06 Escalade 6.0, 98 STS Northstar, 92 STS 4.9 ![]() ![]() --Automobile Magazine, May 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter V6
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SoCal
Drives: '04 Sierra
'02 Regal GS
"05 PT Cruiser
Posts: 1,106
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Quote:
What you may not understand about Aunt Bertha and Uncle Ernie is that is they do not find the Buick they expect to find they are not buying anything. GM needs to take a slow steady approch to moving Buick upmarket and keep things like the 3500 V6 and 5.3L V8 since they are more cost effective than the 3.6L and enable GM to add features to the Buick line that really sell the car and maintain dealer margins. When you add a high price engine like the 3.6L over the 3500 you have to take off $1,500 of desirable features and then are in the "giveaway" mode - something sales reps try to avoid at all costs. A high MPG rating will be all the ammo a good sales rep needs to make a prospective Regal/Wildcat/Invicta buyer forget the lack of OHC engine and allow the sales rep to point out what is ON the car the buyer is LOOKING at buying. Think about the last time someone who bought a "luxury" car showed it to you, what did they focus on? The interior and whatever features the car had not doubt and probably did not even open the hood for you unless you asked. Top notch interiors with rich materials, power tilt/telescoping wheels and 8-12 way power seats with memory settings sell luxury cars more than 4 OHC's. GM can still offer Turbos, DOHC, Superchargers and other performance features on the GS versions that can be added in year 2 or 3 of the model run, but first need to build volume, reputation and PROFITS with the luxury features. Last edited by SierraGS : 07-24-2008 at 09:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
6.2 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Drives: LS2 Pontiac GTO, L76 Pontiac G8
Posts: 2,572
|
Re: Buick, Pontiac, GMC Channel Working
Quote:
GM saying it's going to lump Saturn in with the other brands is a convenient way for them to get out of selling the Insignia here and keeping the already dated Aura around while investment goes where it needs to go, into Chevrolet. This "reshuffling" doesn't actually do anything to address GM's brand problem. Companies that don't have brand problems don't do this, they also don't wrestle with what the brand is supposed to be or have trouble conveying that to consumers. GM has fundamentally broken for years and the number of brands just exacerbates the problem. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|