![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Home | Forum | Active Topics | eBay Marketplace | Media Gallery | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 821
|
Re: Chrysler and GM hold merger talks.
Quote:
__________________
Most of the fools on this site are all about screw the UAW, Rick Wagoner, ETC. How many of you could actually run a large company, probably none, instead you sit in internet forums mouthing off about everything. A good part of you are probably sitting around on your companies time doing this crap, yet you are pissed off somebody makes more than you do. Dont be suprised when your employer finds out you have this much free time and eliminates your job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
3.6 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin,TX
Posts: 1,031
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
5.3 Liter Vortec V8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Body in Detroit, Heart in WISCONSIN
Drives: 08 Saturn Astra 5dr XR
Posts: 1,270
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
If this did happen, lets just say that there will be a grim reaper waling around finding cars to kill off left and right, if not killing off brands. This would be something really hard to imagine either side actually doing. Merging up jeep and hummer wouldnt be bad, most, if not all of Chrysler cars could go, same with dodge, so really GM would not be gaining anything except less competition.
Quote:
![]() Lets go America! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
1.8 Liter ECOTEC
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Drives: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
2009 Cadillac Escalade
Posts: 40
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
This would be one the biggest mistakes GM could ever make!
I don't see how taking on a problem child like Chrysler would help GM's financial problems. If anything, it would make it worse!!! GM's stock would drop to equal that of Ford's!
__________________
DIEHARD GM FAN SINCE 1994! GOD BLESS AMERICA AND GOD BLESS GM! 2009 CADILLAC CTS-V 2009 CADILLAC ESCALADE 2WD LOYAL LIFETIME GM BRAND OWNER! |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Virginia
Drives: 2008 GMC Acadia
2006 Chevy Colorado
Posts: 542
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: St Louis MO
Drives: 2006 Escalade, 98 STS
Posts: 687
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
[Buickman] THIS IS RICK WAGONER'S FAULT ALWAYS ASLEEP AT THE WHEEL [/BUICKMAN]
__________________
www.CADILLACOWNERS.com - 06 Escalade 6.0, 98 STS Northstar, 92 STS 4.9 ![]() ![]() --Automobile Magazine, May 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 323
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
What would be the point of this? How would GM gain from anything Chrysler? They talk about Pontiac being a damaged brand. I think Dodge and Chrysler are much much worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
2.8 Liter Turbocharged V6
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 763
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
Doesn't Chrysler have the same cash problems as GM? How is this going to help either company? GM and Chrysler compete in all the same areas and the GM product is almost always better. GM foreign operations are also a lot stronger. I just don't see the value, besides "Chrysler will you more American parts".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
7.0 Liter LS7 V8
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,027
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
Quote:
1) It was a train wreck of corporate cultures 2) It was not about making a better "whole" it was about Carly's ego 3) It was a huge overlap of function and a masive waist of money 4) It confused loyal customers and triggered pretty much 100% of corporate customers to go out to tender. 5) Ultimately the CEO and much of the board were fired 6) GM got the failed Compaq guy on our board... A merge with Chysler is pure nuts... We need the "just ask Rick plan" and we need it NOW. I only hope that this is GM's way of saying... "Hiya, we are for sale dontchaknow."
__________________
Cadillac! GM's "Back to the Future" Division GM's Deja Vu Division Cadillac is a Car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 274
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
This thread ought to be titled ""GM and Chrysler HELD Preliminary Merger Talks". The Wall Street Journal says that the talks are on hold, and COULD be renewed when (if ?) the markets stabilize.
The article also says that Cerebus proposed swapping Chrysler for the rest of GMAC. That brings GM no cash, which is what's needed. The Chrysler brand brings nothing to GM. Why on Earth would GM want to ad models, brands, dealerships, and add 10's of thousands of union payroll? Only reason would be if Cerebus was bringing a pile of cash to the table, and they're not, at least according to the WSJ. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Illinois
Drives: 1998 Camaro SS Convertible
Posts: 164
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
Actually, maybe not a bad Idea.
GM would get the rear drive chassis under the (Charger,Challenger, 300C) which it is sorely lacking and had to kill of because of cash crunch. GM would get Jeep and could kill off the overblown Gas Hog SUV's (i.e. H2, Commander, etc.) and replace with SUV's people may actually buy. (Lambda Based perhaps?) As said in some of the other postings, getting the Daimler technologies to push into the overall merged product lines. Another reason to dump underperforming brand names (i.e. Pontiac, GMC, and Saturn). Many possibilities here. Also, the idea of being able to dump GMAC completely during this crunch may not be too bad either. Obviously some very long lived brands would end up falling by the wayside. But, that is the very nature of progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
3.0 Liter SIDI V6
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 554
|
Re: Breaking: GM and CHRYSLER Hold Preliminary Merger Talks
GM needs a new GEO, a value priced brand. Dodge has the reputation of being inexpensive and the quality image can't get any worse. GM could import Chinese small cars and slap a Dodge label on them. Gotta have something to compete with the Chinese brands once they do arrive.
__________________
OPEC's greatest fear is America's amber waves of grain |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement |
|
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|