GM Inside News Forum - View Single Post - STS-V.... Ok

cvp33 · 12-01-2005, 10:09 PM

STS-V just plain sucks. Slower than a CTS-V. Slower than all it's competitors. Oh, I forgot it's $10,000 less than an E55. Yah, that'll sway the enthusiasts over to the Cadillac banner. The 2004 CTS-V beat the S4, M3, M5, C32 and everything else in it's class for thousands le$$. It was noisy, ill shifting, wheel hopping and the interior sucks according to some (not me). But guess what? It goes like stink and kicked German engineered ass. As for the STS-V. Why bother?

12-01-2005, 10:09 PM	#7 (permalink)
cvp33 2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 129	Re: STS-V.... Ok STS-V just plain sucks. Slower than a CTS-V. Slower than all it's competitors. Oh, I forgot it's $10,000 less than an E55. Yah, that'll sway the enthusiasts over to the Cadillac banner. The 2004 CTS-V beat the S4, M3, M5, C32 and everything else in it's class for thousands le$$. It was noisy, ill shifting, wheel hopping and the interior sucks according to some (not me). But guess what? It goes like stink and kicked German engineered ass. As for the STS-V. Why bother? __________________ BLACKBeast 2006 300C SRT-8 Dyno - 401rwhp 411rwtq (factory freak) Option I, II, Kicker, Sunroof Magnaflow mid-pipes and catback, Mopar CAI, Xenon Fogs, KW V2's and Hotchkis Swaybars, SRT-8 Mats, SRT-8 Drilled Pedals, SRT-8 logo'd hood and trunk liner