|
Re: Toyota measuring "time on the lot" for Prius in HOURS - But is it all just Hype?
These arguments that a "Hybrid costs more than a non-hybrid Civic" are true, but the same argument can be made for an inexpensive, not extremely fuel efficient (for its class) car like a Chevy Aveo. The "special value" Aveo can be had for under 10,000 dollars. Now how much more real utility/comfort/gas savings does a Prius offer over an Aveo hatch? Is it worth the extra 14,000 dollars, waiting lists, and over sticker pricing?
These are the thoughts that go through my head when calculating the total cost of ownership over a 7-10 year period on any vehicle. Edmunds will want me to believe that a 10 year old Prius will have a favorable resale value when compared to a 4-cylinder Malibu or Suzuki Forenza Wagon simply by virtue of being a Toyota, but I wonder --- how good will that resale be for those hybrids as their batteries run out?
The Prius, like a luxury trim SUV, is a statement. But isn't an Aveo hatch or Ford Focus Wagon the statement that says "Frugal and Utilitarian" more than a Prius or other pricey hybrid? I think so. Even the upcoming "mild-hybrid" BAS system (which is good enough to call "Green" but stretching it to use the "Hybrid" moniker) Malibu will probably be a more intelligent choice for people looking to save money and drive their car for 5 years or more.
Last edited by Ming : 09-26-2005 at 03:53 PM.
|