|
Re: Review: Malibu Maxx offers Chevy concept of 'blue-collar tech'
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CountryME
An interesting article appeard in Car and Driver in May of 2004, written by Larry Webster. While the article focuses mainly on GM V-8 pushrod engines, it sheds alot of light on why a pushrod engine is better than the HF OHC engines. I am not a fan of the new more complex HF engines, but I do admit that if you want the additional tech to brag about, then the associated costs should be expected in the price tag.
Also, if memory serves me, isn't the Malibu SS getting the 3.9 HF V-6?
Here is a link to the article.
The pushrod engine finally gets its due.
By Larry Webster
May 2004
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=1
|
Great article. GM has its fair share of OHC engines too mostly at the lower end . Isn't the Caddy 2.8 OHC? The I 4.2 chopped for the Colorado/Canyon yields the 3.5 and 2.8. The Ecotec 2.0, 2.2, and soon 2.4 are all DOHC and are great engines. The Saturn SL series ran exclusively OHC for 10 years.
__________________
Of all the properties which belong to honorable men, not one is so highly prized as that of character.
Henry Clay
|