Quote:
Originally Posted by AMERICA 123
You are without a doubt, one of the worst posters on the forum - your accuracy overall runs at about 20% - and that's a charitable estimate.
TOYOTA
Tundra 4WD .................................................. A-S5 .....4.7/8 ...... 13/16 ..... $4,391
.................................................. ....................A-S6......5.7/8 ...... 13/17 ..... $4,102
Tundra 4WD FFV ............................................A-S6......5.7/8 .......10/13 ..... $4,840 ....E85
.................................................. .................................................. 13/17.......$4,102 ....Gas
************************************************** ***********
TOYOTA
Tundra 2WD .................................................. A-S5........4.0/6.........15/19 ........$3,844
.................................................. ...................A-S5.........4.7/8 ........14/17 ........$4,102
.................................................. ...................A-S6.........5.7/8.........14/18.........$3,844
************************************************** ***********
EPA INTERIOR VOLUME PASSENGER - TRUNK ( cu - ft )
Crown Vic............................107............21
Impala.................................105........ ...19
Charger..............................104.......... ..16
300C..................................107......... ...17
|
my mpg for the f150 is for the non fuel efficent model which is for one model trim level only. MY findings are driectly from the manufactors own website with a link tha ti provided. Were is your link?
and with the crown vic according to your own numbers the Crown Vic still is bigger then the 300c.... so who is the one that is accurate here man..... I take it you must work for the liberal media elite. Also the 300c does even look to be as large as the Crown Vic. Plus alot of people like the looks of the crown vic or ford would not be selling them hand over fist to people....