GM Inside News Forum - View Single Post - Merger, Who Is It Good For? A Big Al Rant

vam29 · 10-12-2008, 09:41 PM

Why not just trade GMAC for Dodge, Jeep, some worthwile tech patents and the Chrysler name. Then borrow $50 billion to start another captive finance company that focuses strictly on automotive operations. The new line-up could be: Chev; Buick-Pontiac/Saturn-Dodge; Cad-Saab-Jeep. GMC models could become Chevs,boosting their sales, and Jeep would replace Hummers at most Cad dealers avoiding big pay-outs for closing Hummer. GM would probably have very little difficulty raising the capital from banks and investors for the new finance company . Don't overlook the talented management at Chrysler too. Cerberus could close the unnecessary Chrysler plants themselves, instead of GM, and take the write-off against it's other investments.

10-12-2008, 09:41 PM	#24 (permalink)
vam29 2.4 Liter SIDI ECOTEC Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 175	Re: Merger, Who Is It Good For? A Big Al Rant Why not just trade GMAC for Dodge, Jeep, some worthwile tech patents and the Chrysler name. Then borrow $50 billion to start another captive finance company that focuses strictly on automotive operations. The new line-up could be: Chev; Buick-Pontiac/Saturn-Dodge; Cad-Saab-Jeep. GMC models could become Chevs,boosting their sales, and Jeep would replace Hummers at most Cad dealers avoiding big pay-outs for closing Hummer. GM would probably have very little difficulty raising the capital from banks and investors for the new finance company . Don't overlook the talented management at Chrysler too. Cerberus could close the unnecessary Chrysler plants themselves, instead of GM, and take the write-off against it's other investments. Last edited by vam29 : 10-12-2008 at 09:46 PM.