View Single Post
Old 09-17-2008, 02:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
Ming
GMI Staff Member
Premium Member
 
Ming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: An Alternate Timeline
Posts: 14,684
Re: Hurricane Ike: An Argument for Small Trucks, and Shreveport

Quote:
Originally Posted by SDRacing View Post
Whats your opinion on the pontiac G8 p/u? Would you like it more without the v8?
I'd normally love it, even with the V8, but with gas prices where they are, even the 3.6L V6 is not a gas sipper, and since I live in a flood prone area, the clearance would still be an issue.

I have a 2004 Safari AWD that is good for now, but it's a gas pig and we avoid driving it much. When I trade it in I'd like a vehicle similar to a crew cab Canyon / Colorado I4.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KingElvis View Post
I always like reading a Ming editorial. Glad to see you made it through!

Still... The mileage/cost numbers don't really add up for the Canyon. If you have a 16/22mpg full size, the 18/24mpg mid size doesn't look that good - and then they aren't really less expensive - either to make OR buy.
First, thanks! And a pre-emptive thanks to others. It was sure scary with all of the 70-foot pines around.

I took on the "full size is better" angle in my commentary. While it may be true in some cases, I don't think it's true for crew cabs (and that's all I'm interested in).

2009 GMC Canyon Crew Cab 2WD VL-3 Invoice $21,000 - I4 (18/24)
2009 GMC Sierra 1500 Crew Cab 2WD Invoice $25,000 - V8 (Not 16/22!) --- It's not listed yet where I've looked - is it 14/19 for the base V8 engine?

14/19 at $25,000
vs.
18/24 at $21,000

Even if it's 15/20, that's still a good difference. 3-4 more miles per gallon, though I'll I guess it really depends on whether or not you NEED the capability of a Sierra. If not, you'll save on the sticker and on gas, unless of course GM is having another one of its infamous fire sales on the big trucks.

Last edited by Ming : 09-17-2008 at 03:20 PM.
Ming is offline   Reply With Quote