View Single Post
Old 07-27-2008, 09:00 PM   #6 (permalink)
big swede
6.2 Liter LS9 Supercharged V8
 
big swede's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midwest
Drives: 07' Monte Carlo SS
Posts: 5,065
Re: 350 hp V-6 Mustang???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ach View Post
I continue to be skeptical of the fuel economy benefits of a turbo V6 vs. a V8 when they are making the same power- especially when the naturally aspirated D35 is thirsty already (I know b/c I drive one every day).

Having said that, if Ford can keep the weight of the EcoBoost Mustang to 3400-3500 lbs., it should be competitive acceleration wise vs. the much heavier Camaro and Challenger.
I would agree with you 100% during real world driving. The problem is that even with the new, slightly more acurate EPA testing, the cars are driven like there is an egg between your foot and the gas pedal, always accelerating very slowly and never going over the speed limit all of which will favor a smaller cubic inch motor. In essence the manufacuteres are catering to the EPA.

I don't really have a problem with a Mustang getting a Turbo V6 as one of the options. Ford is smartly investing heavily in DSG type gearboxes and we all know how turbos love automatics. A turbo 6 and a 6-8 speed DSG will get good mileage while driving to and from work and will make great power to make sure the Mustang remains a fun to drive car.

I'm pretty sure if GM would put a turbocharger on the 3.6 and shove it into a RWD platform there would be plenty of us jumping for joy.

Last edited by big swede : 07-27-2008 at 09:02 PM.
big swede is offline   Reply With Quote