Quote:
Originally Posted by Ming
When it comes down to it, how did GM's concept to production time match up with the Dodge Challenger?
|
Pretty much dead on, but considering that Challenger already had a platform as well as engines and powertrains already certified for that platform, all they had to do was come up with some sheet metal. And that they lifted right off of the 1970's. Really...what took the Challenger so long?
It feels long cause Camaro has been in the lime light longer.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LesabreLtd
I hope they can be equipped with a V-6...
|
Sure will. And by the 15 people who got to drive it, they said that teh V6 car will by far exceed everyones expectations. Nore more settling for a V6 car.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ming
I was hoping for the price-friendly, torquey 3900 OHV V6. Did that ever pan out? Or did they go with the 3.6L? (Geez, I'm out of it, following Unicorns like the Beat)
|
With economy of scale, how much more expensive is it to make the 3.6, which is in every car that has a V6 (outside of Impala) then to produce the 3.9 for Camaro and Impala alone? Add direct injection for more performance and better fuel econ....
Stop chasing Beats. If anything, see if Paul can send one over.
Here is my prediction. 300hp with 30mpg highway in a 3600lbs package with 6spd manual or automatic, with more standard equipment then Mustang or Challenger, and a price of 23,995. Pricing wont be announced till just before going on sale, but we should know 7/8ths of the Camaro mystery come Monday afternoon.