View Single Post
Old 06-24-2008, 09:28 AM   #11 (permalink)
CaptainDan
3.6 Liter V6
 
CaptainDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan
Drives: '05 GTO
Posts: 1,011
Re: A News Article (Kinda!) Supports GM's 2-Mode Strategy

Quote:
Originally Posted by O_Z View Post
I don't see real difference
It same kind of smart change like dropping Cobalt or Grand Am name

PS I grew up in country which uses metric system

The metric aspect doesn't matter.

What "bcjohnso99" was saying, is that mpg empasizes the MILES as the variable - if I get better fuel economy, I get more MILES to a gallon.

If you rate fuel economy as gallons per 100 miles (gallons per mile would be a fraction) then the emphasis is on the fuel used - if I get better fuel economy, I need less fuel to drive the same distance.


If you compare two vehicles, the miles you can go per a set amount of fuel matters less than the fuel used over a set distance. Because I have a certain SET distance I need to drive. To work, to school, to the store, etc....those distances don't change if I get better fuel economy, the fuel used DOES.

mpg is an INDIRECT measurement of fuel economy.
gp100m is a DIRECT measurement of fuel economy.
__________________
'05 GTO
6.0 Liter LS2
400 horsepower
Anything less is just a hamster on a wheel.
CaptainDan is offline   Reply With Quote