View Single Post
Old 08-07-2007, 01:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Ming
GMI Staff Member
 
Ming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 13,479
Re: Chevrolet Spark Fires up GM's Indian Market

Quote:
Originally Posted by samkung
haha i prefer Spark over Aveo hehe

BTW what is that S-tec engine?
The S-TEC, like many GM Daewoo engines, was never an all-original Korean engine from the ground up. The Matiz (aka "Spark") itself replaced the Daewoo Tico, a variant of the 1988 Suzuki Alto.

S-TEC is a low-displacement engine range codeveloped by Suzuki and Daewoo Motors for use in micro- and subcompact cars.

The first model was 0.8 L Straight-3 engine, based on the powerplant of the Suzuki Alto. It was used in Daewoo Tico and later the Daewoo Matiz.

In 2002, the range was extended to 1.0 L and 1.2 L Straight-4 engines and updated with EGR valve to reduce pollution. A new engine plant for the updated model T4 was built. The 1.0 version is used in Chevrolet Matiz and the 1.2 in the European Chevrolet Kalos.

In 2004 the 0.8/1.0 engines were updated again. New intake and exhaust systems, along with low-friction aluminum cam followers with rollers were added, resulting in better economy. They are used in Chevrolet Matiz (model M200).

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daewoo_S-Tec_engine

Quote:
Originally Posted by DmitryKo
GM Daewoo was able to improve the ancient S-TEC engine block inherited from the Suzuki Alto and squeeze up to 15% more fuel economy out of it.

Here's official engine data for new Chevrolet Matiz from www.gmeurope.com/geneva2005; fuel economy is 13% to 18% better comparing with older-generation engines!
EDIT: wrong mpg conversion; corrected!
Code:
Engine               ====== new S-TEC =======
                     0.8L 3i       1.0L
Power, kW (hp)       38 (52)       49 (66)
      @ rpm          6000          5400
Torque, Nm (lb.ft)   72 (53)      91 (67)
      @ rpm          4600         4200
Comsumption,
      L/100 km (mpg)
      Urban          6.9 (34.1)    7.2 (32.7)
      Extra-urban    4.2 (56.0)    4.6 (51.1)
      Combined       5.2 (45.2)    5.7 (41.3)
I think it's reasonable to expect at least 10% improvement for the upper-range as well, considering the updated technology.

Last edited by Ming : 08-07-2007 at 01:37 PM.
Ming is offline   Reply With Quote